dagblog - Comments for "Murder in Michigan"

I gave you the Scripture and

rmrd0000 — Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:53:12 +0000

In reply to Your question as a whole didn

I gave you the Scripture and asked a question. I gave my answer. You have to dodge the question because your warped interpretation of Scripture would make you appear foolish.

Your question as a whole didn

Resistance — Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:02:15 +0000

In reply to Murder in Michigan

Your question as a whole didn’t make sense,

If the stoning is a Gods will. Why are you altering it to fit modern society? Are you bowing to the wishes of the World?

If the stoning is a Gods will ?????

Really, you want to question Gods will or sovereignty?

Your inquiry, reminds me of Satan’s question to Eve

Genesis 3:1-4

The Fall

3 Now uthe serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the Lord God had made.

He said to the woman,

“Did God actually say,

‘You1 shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” 2 And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, 3 but God said, v‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’”

4 wBut the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die.

You cry about the injustices of mankind and how blacks can’t get justice; but your question and casting doubt upon Gods rules or laws is similar to the opposer of Gods right to rule, that led to injustices for thousands of years .

Did God really say a child should be stoned” Do you agree

A question or deception?

“Why are you altering it to fit modern society”

How so?

From the scripture you provided, it is apparent God approves of Capital punishment

It is modern society who rejects the prescribed penalties, for violating the Laws of God.

I am more interested in principles. So we don’t have pharasic/ rabbinic decrees, with a list covering 1000’s of laws

Christians under no obligation to comply with a law that is immoral and never given as a law to Christians

What is your supporting authority for such an assumption? Just because you say so?

Here is a possible a modern day application of the principles laid out in that law.

If you use a firearm purposely, to murder or injure another; with the exception of self-defense or accident, the law will stone you to death. God won’t disagree.

To finish up

You have misrepresented my viewpoint on certain individuals’ deaths.

I am consistent on my insistence, on a fair trial for all; no matter what color or race.

If the punishment for the use of a firearm;could bring the death penalty. I am not going to be “bowing to the wishes of the World” Or to those who would incite racial tensions.

I want a lawful Court and fair trial. to determine any individual’s guilt, before the death sentence is meted out.

Let me repeat, A fair trial for all, no matter what color or race.

So don’t give me anymore debating, on the subject about injustices by man; because I agree with you, about the sad affairs of injustice. Jesus was unjustly condemned to death.

Are we supposed to wait till perfection and the establishment of the Kingdom, to punish wrong doers? No need to answer, it’s just a question to ponder.

In conclusion

You offer no authority, other than your own opinions. And when you give a scriptural reference as authority, you make improper application.

I am through debating with you. When you question Gods laws to the Nation of Israel, you question Gods sovereignty. No respect for God or his laws, has led to all the injustices everyone deplores, ever since the Garden of Eden up through today.

Resistance, God appointed

rmrd0000 — Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:17:52 +0000

In reply to Murder in Michigan

Resistance, God appointed Kings. King were to be removed when they displeased God. Where in the Bible does it say that the President and Congress are equivalent to a King? Kings gave edicts. The President and Congress can be overruled by a Supreme Court. Kings ruled over their subjects and could rule for life. The President and Congress have to appeal to voters at election time. Where is the American King who can appoint magistrates? There is no American King.

I always thought that you

rmrd0000 — Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:06:29 +0000

In reply to Speaking as one who narrowly

I always thought that you were "stoned" back in the day, fitting in line with Deuteronomy.

You don't care to answer

rmrd0000 — Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:28:31 +0000

In reply to There are times I want to

You don't care to answer followed by

Don't assume assume I know that answer because you answered it above.

This word salad is consistent other statements that you have made.

Christians under no obligation to comply with a law that is immoral and never given as a law to Christians. Christians have no problem stating that the stoning penalty is not a Christian law. Should the child be stoned? Clear and simply "No".

Public protest does not condemn a Christian to Hell. False prophets may be another matter.

I'll answer the second and

Resistance — Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:25:00 +0000

In reply to If the stoning is a Gods will

I'll answer the second and reflect upon the first

No I don't believe in the Curse of Ham

Unless you're thinking about Trichinosis

There are times I want to

Resistance — Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:18:09 +0000

In reply to So your answer to stoning the

There are times I want to reflect and other times I just don't care to answer. So please don't assume, because I didn't reply, you know the answer

Besides; I answered it above,

Your internet must be slow because your a question or answer behind

I thought Jolly's reply was an excellent response, I hope you understood the word picture/meaning (some other man's problem? )

If the stoning is a Gods will

rmrd0000 — Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:50:32 +0000

In reply to I read the account of Paul

If the stoning is a Gods will. Why are you altering it to fit modern society? Are you bowing to the wishes of the World?

BTW

Do accept the Curse of Ham?

I read the account of Paul

Resistance — Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:41:01 +0000

In reply to Once again you use diversion.

I read the account of Paul that you provided. Christians did not lead a rebellion or protest to free Paul

In short

Paul used the occasion to shame the magistrates into apologizing, and by doing so, Paul established the lawfulness, of preaching the Good News He and other Christians were not criminals, because of their teachings.

Again, no rebellion or street protests by a multitude of Christians, demanding his release

//////

As for the drunken child

If God thought the law necessary who am I to question his wisdom.

Now ponder my question. What are we to do with drunks or others that use mind altering drugs and others get hurt ?

God had the ones you spoke of, removed from society so they would no longer be a possible threat to others in the society or norms of behavior conducive to peace.

I guess if I lived back then, I wouldn't want to be a belligerent, disobedient, drunkard child

I wouldn't need a drink that badly. Personal responsibility?

Speaking as one who narrowly

jollyroger — Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:29:24 +0000

In reply to So your answer to stoning the

Speaking as one who narrowly (by a few millenia, anyway) avoided this fate, I am moved to wonder about the absence of any remedies for rebellious daughters. Or did they just sell them off and let them be some other man's problem?