dagblog - Comments for "Playing Defense and Still Losing " http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/playing-defense-and-still-losing-18876 Comments for "Playing Defense and Still Losing " en Better than I could have said http://dagblog.com/comment/199210#comment-199210 <a id="comment-199210"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/199131#comment-199131">Thanks for this, David.  We</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Better than I could have said myself.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:19:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 199210 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for this, David.  We http://dagblog.com/comment/199131#comment-199131 <a id="comment-199131"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/playing-defense-and-still-losing-18876">Playing Defense and Still Losing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for this, David.  We're headed into midterms as Obama has had his ambitions, foreign and domestic, derailed by international events.  The idea of a long game has, sadly, long eluded the left event while the right has, since the 1970s, been building the foundations of movement, after movement, after movement.</p> <p>Since you brought up, <em>Unreasonable Men</em>, I'll also bring up <em>Blowing Smoke</em> -- the common themes in both of Michael's books is that long dated movements work, but only if the party behind it can withstand the shocks of temporary losses.  Some of those losses, by the way, will seem existential, but they aren't.</p> <p>The Republicans show us this again and again as the Tea Party unseats incumbent who would surely win, only to replace them with long shot candidates.  Most of the time, their long shot lose.  They do not apologize for that.  Sometimes, their long shots win.  They dance in the endzone.</p> <p>The Democrats and the people who back them are a cautious bunch.  We're always trying to do the rational thing here and now (politically) while not building a long future.  The irony is that conservative thinking is all about the here and now in a practical sense (what can we get?) while it jeopardizes everyone in both the short and long term.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 13 Sep 2014 03:33:02 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 199131 at http://dagblog.com The party of  a  two term http://dagblog.com/comment/199129#comment-199129 <a id="comment-199129"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/playing-defense-and-still-losing-18876">Playing Defense and Still Losing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The party of  a  two term president  always loses seats in the sixth year's   election.  We can hypothesize various explanations but why bother.That's a fact with which the candidates of the presidential party have to deal.Probably by pretending that if elected they'll be independent of that guy in the White House.</p> <p>I wouldn't advise them otherwise. </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 13 Sep 2014 02:32:35 +0000 Flavius comment 199129 at http://dagblog.com Wonderful to see you back at http://dagblog.com/comment/199119#comment-199119 <a id="comment-199119"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/playing-defense-and-still-losing-18876">Playing Defense and Still Losing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wonderful to see you back at dag, David! Great piece, and thanks so much for the discussion of Unreasonable Men.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:07:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 199119 at http://dagblog.com