dagblog - Comments for "ISIS and the Intimate Kill" http://dagblog.com/link/isis-and-intimate-kill-19043 Comments for "ISIS and the Intimate Kill" en It isn’t all shock and gore. http://dagblog.com/comment/200932#comment-200932 <a id="comment-200932"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/isis-and-intimate-kill-19043">ISIS and the Intimate Kill</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>It isn’t all shock and gore. Sometimes, it’s mock and bore. Consider the <a href="https://news.vice.com/article/new-islamic-state-video-shows-hostage-john-cantlie-allegedly-reporting-from-the-ground-in-kobane">video</a> that ISIS released a few weeks ago....</p> <p>On Sunday, however, ISIS <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/11/should-the-united-states-pay-ransoms-to-terrorists/382803/">released</a> what is arguably its most horrifying beheading <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/11/should-the-united-states-pay-ransoms-to-terrorists/382803/">video</a> to date, reverting to the shock-and-gore doctrine that has come to define it. The viewer doesn’t see the actual beheading of American aid worker Peter Kassig, but is shown his severed head, lying at the feet of the suspected British terrorist known as “Jihadi John.” The scene is preceded by the mass beheadings of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-30073602">18 men</a> whom ISIS claims are members of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s armed forces. The victims are paraded about by knife-wielding jihadists and the camera lingers on the hostages’ faces as they kneel, stricken with terror. The pounding of heartbeats commences, just one of the video’s many special effects. Then the cutting starts, all at once. Unlike in ISIS’s previous beheading videos, there is no merciful cutaway. The viewer sees everything.....</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Tue, 18 Nov 2014 07:41:22 +0000 artappraiser comment 200932 at http://dagblog.com