dagblog - Comments for "Warren still undecided about presidential run" http://dagblog.com/link/warren-still-undecided-about-presidential-run-19117 Comments for "Warren still undecided about presidential run" en think they're callled "twit http://dagblog.com/comment/201919#comment-201919 <a id="comment-201919"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/201916#comment-201916">I&#039;ve just been informed that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>think they're callled "twit-tards" (say it fast), but could be wrong</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:24:59 +0000 Anonymous PP comment 201919 at http://dagblog.com I've just been informed that http://dagblog.com/comment/201916#comment-201916 <a id="comment-201916"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/warren-still-undecided-about-presidential-run-19117">Warren still undecided about presidential run</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I've just been informed that people who post on twitter are not called twits. My apologies. In my defense I've read a few twitter feeds urging Warren to run and it seems to me that calling twitter-eesĀ  (is that the correct nomenclature?) twits isn't an unreasonable error.</p> <p>Again, my apologies to anyone I've offended.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:08:05 +0000 ocean-kat comment 201916 at http://dagblog.com