dagblog - Comments for "Irony " http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/irony-19207 Comments for "Irony " en Your comparison of the schism http://dagblog.com/comment/203167#comment-203167 <a id="comment-203167"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203131#comment-203131">Your video game reference is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Your comparison of the schism between Al Qaeda and the Islamic State to video game platforms is telling and typical of Western inability to understand the world in any terms other than our narrow mercantile obsessions along with reducing their agendas to mere violence and attention seeking.</p> <p>The French government and Google financing the printing of 3 million copies of the intentionally inciting Charlie cartoons is not designed to reduce tensions any more than the airing of the murder porn will produce a collective public yawn.</p> <p>The Western public is certainly desensitized  to the suffering we create but is hardly desensitized to the manipulation that drives Western aggression and arrogance.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:22:20 +0000 Peter comment 203167 at http://dagblog.com The video game mention was on http://dagblog.com/comment/203132#comment-203132 <a id="comment-203132"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203131#comment-203131">Your video game reference is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The video game mention was on another thread (at least I think it was you!), but it's still a good one. ;-)</p></div></div></div> Fri, 16 Jan 2015 01:24:33 +0000 barefooted comment 203132 at http://dagblog.com Your video game reference is http://dagblog.com/comment/203131#comment-203131 <a id="comment-203131"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203126#comment-203126">To take your point even</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Your video game reference is apt. The rivalry between AQAP and ISIS is reminiscent of PlayStation vs Xbox. Which can grab the most attention with high-tech marketing and violent, graphic gameplay?</p><p> I hope you're wrong about desensitization. But on the other hand, maybe flooding the airwaves with the Charlie caricatures would take some air out of their balloon. A collective public yawn - is <i>that</i> what all the fuss is about?</p></div></div></div> Fri, 16 Jan 2015 01:14:50 +0000 barefooted comment 203131 at http://dagblog.com To take your point even http://dagblog.com/comment/203126#comment-203126 <a id="comment-203126"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/irony-19207">Irony </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>To take your point even further, with the kind of terrorist act as in Paris, or something along the lines of ISIS video beheadings, this sort of depends upon people being appalled by bloody gore and violence, does it not? They are trying to induce fear, to terrorize with this. If people are more and more desensitized to this, what good is it?</p> <p>Are they on their way to becoming another IRA, where for decades it was "another day, another bombing in Ireland, so what?"<br />  </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:19:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 203126 at http://dagblog.com An honest reader! http://dagblog.com/comment/203120#comment-203120 <a id="comment-203120"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203101#comment-203101">Ah, I just misread it. Very</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>An honest reader!</p> <p>I was going to say:</p> <p>An honest woman Oxy.</p> <p>Let us all march for freedom of speech.</p> <p>Whilst the leaders of the march incarcerate those who 'abuse' free speech.</p> <p>If I call for the murder of Rush or Hannity or whoever....</p> <p>THAT IS WRONG.</p> <p>I have written blogs about internet 'radio hosts' who projected the addresses of Judges and called for their deaths!</p> <p>It is hard to distinguish.</p> <p>When is speech ACTION.</p> <p>When is speech actionable felony?</p> <p>Cry fire in an elementary school?</p> <p>Or like Rush, just dream that riots break out at a Dem Convention?</p> <p>THIS ISSUE OR THESE ISSUES ARE NOT EASY TO INTERPRET!</p> <p>That is all I got right now.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 15 Jan 2015 21:18:48 +0000 Richard Day comment 203120 at http://dagblog.com But Allah forbid we see http://dagblog.com/comment/203104#comment-203104 <a id="comment-203104"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/irony-19207">Irony </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px">But Allah forbid we see satirical cartoons. Some people might be offended.</span></p> </blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px">I suspect the majority of those who believe in Allah, reject the violent images shown on TV because they know, what a person views or takes in, can corrupt the minds and hearts ? </span></p> <p><span style="font-size:13px">Zeal for what is righteous and upbuilding      or   Zeal for disgusting things and it's influence? </span></p> <p><span style="font-size:13px">           NO PORN                                                         PORN </span></p> <p><a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=2&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=0CCUQFjAB&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPhinehas&amp;ei=xXq3VPGmHpSeyASB-YCQCw&amp;usg=AFQjCNEdrtrZCJJ-cLcZO_SX7Kxvw2WiWw">Phinehas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:53:13 +0000 Resistance comment 203104 at http://dagblog.com Apparently I gave the wrong http://dagblog.com/comment/203099#comment-203099 <a id="comment-203099"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203095#comment-203095">Hey, barefooted. I think the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Apparently I gave the wrong impression. No, I don't think the media is trying to incite violence. Yet one of the main reasons given for not showing the Charlie cartoons is fear of backlash, along with a deference to those who may be offended. I find it ironic that real flesh-and-blood violence is not considered so. Why is it okay to show us new photos today from inside the kosher deli with bodies on the floor, but not cartoons?</p><p>The outlets that are refusing to show them are willing to show the aftermath but not the apparent cause. Isn't that what the murderers wanted?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 15 Jan 2015 04:34:06 +0000 barefooted comment 203099 at http://dagblog.com Ah, I just misread it. Very http://dagblog.com/comment/203101#comment-203101 <a id="comment-203101"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203099#comment-203099">Apparently I gave the wrong</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ah, I just misread it. Very good questions, for which I don't have any answers.  </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 15 Jan 2015 04:17:00 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 203101 at http://dagblog.com Hey, barefooted. I think the http://dagblog.com/comment/203095#comment-203095 <a id="comment-203095"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/irony-19207">Irony </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hey, barefooted. I think the tendency of "violence depictions in media" to incite violence depends on what kind of media and the subject matter. Live television coverage of a riot in the making is most likely going to incite some others who have physical access to the geographical area and go there to participate. Whether it's the violence or the reality show qualities in general, I don't know.  </p> <p>As for the French attack, I read one comment that a cartoon is unique in that it is "handmade", making it a "personal" affront.</p> <p>    </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 15 Jan 2015 02:14:44 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 203095 at http://dagblog.com