dagblog - Comments for "The Cowardly Liberal Talks About Strength" http://dagblog.com/cowardly-liberal-talks-about-strength-19208 Comments for "The Cowardly Liberal Talks About Strength" en So you needn't take this as a http://dagblog.com/comment/203209#comment-203209 <a id="comment-203209"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203164#comment-203164">Resistance, you may have</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px">So you needn't take this as a warning. </span></p> </blockquote> <p>Yeah, right.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:18:46 +0000 Resistance comment 203209 at http://dagblog.com Oh, I'm kidding!  Honest! http://dagblog.com/comment/203196#comment-203196 <a id="comment-203196"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203195#comment-203195">Meanwhile the Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh, I'm kidding!  Sort of.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 17 Jan 2015 03:29:00 +0000 Ramona comment 203196 at http://dagblog.com Meanwhile the Republicans http://dagblog.com/comment/203195#comment-203195 <a id="comment-203195"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203194#comment-203194">Well, Dylan&#039;s advice was good</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Meanwhile the Republicans control everything but the White House.</p> <p> </p> <p>"Alas, regardless of their doom, the little victims play!  No sense have they of ills to come, nor care beyond today."</p> <p>Thomas Gray </p> <p>And. . .</p> <p>"The sky is falling!"</p> <p>Chicken Little</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 17 Jan 2015 03:26:07 +0000 Ramona comment 203195 at http://dagblog.com Well, Dylan's advice was good http://dagblog.com/comment/203194#comment-203194 <a id="comment-203194"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203188#comment-203188">I had been feeling that way,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>Well, Dylan's advice was good : Just keep on , keepen' on.</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>So was Chekov's : God see's the truth. But waits.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 17 Jan 2015 03:02:31 +0000 Flavius comment 203194 at http://dagblog.com I believe that was Leo http://dagblog.com/comment/203193#comment-203193 <a id="comment-203193"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203114#comment-203114">Show me a good loser, and I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I believe that was Leo Durocher.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 17 Jan 2015 02:56:29 +0000 Flavius comment 203193 at http://dagblog.com Woah, non sequitur much? http://dagblog.com/comment/203191#comment-203191 <a id="comment-203191"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203162#comment-203162">I&#039;m referring to the Biblical</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px">Woah, </span><em>non sequitur</em><span style="font-size:13px"> much? Which case or ruling are we talking about? Paul's?   </span>by Verified Atheist <em>8 hours 49 min</em> ago in <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203160#comment-203160">The Cowardly Liberal Talks About Strength</a></p> </blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px">Now you say it was the Paul I thought you were talking about? </span></p> <p><span style="font-size:13px">Evidently; Writing the Truth is not one of your attributes?.</span></p> <p><span style="font-size:13px">You twist words and thoughts to put others in a bad light,  now calling deception .... sarcasm?</span></p> <p><span style="font-size:13px">Governments are in a mess because of this bad trait you have utilized. </span></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:47:40 +0000 Resistance comment 203191 at http://dagblog.com I had been feeling that way, http://dagblog.com/comment/203188#comment-203188 <a id="comment-203188"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203187#comment-203187">We can&#039;t afford to be okay</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I had been feeling that way, but have had a relapse.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:06:11 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 203188 at http://dagblog.com We can't afford to be okay http://dagblog.com/comment/203187#comment-203187 <a id="comment-203187"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203182#comment-203182">Oxy, you could be right about</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We can't afford to be okay about 2016. Hillary Clinton is by no means a shoe-in, and the Republicans are energized. We need a strong, vibrant primary with as many progressive voices as possible. She'll almost certainly win the nomination, but the base needs to hear how she responds to more liberal views than she currently holds.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:46:46 +0000 barefooted comment 203187 at http://dagblog.com Preachin' to the choir…  http://dagblog.com/comment/203183#comment-203183 <a id="comment-203183"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203181#comment-203181">That might be ok if the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Preachin' to the choir… <img alt="wink" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/all/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.png" style="height:23px; width:23px" title="wink" /></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:40:27 +0000 Verified Atheist comment 203183 at http://dagblog.com Oxy, you could be right about http://dagblog.com/comment/203182#comment-203182 <a id="comment-203182"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/203176#comment-203176">Hey, Ramona, chin up.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oxy, you could be right about Texas vs. Michigan when it come to our politics.  But the truth is, Michigan Democrats have been out of the mix since Reagan.  It's true we've had a few Dem governors since then but most of the time they've been hobbled by a Republican legislature unwilling to let them win on any level lest people might think the Dems can actually govern.</p> <p>I wish I felt okay about 2016.  I'm not there yet.  I've been through this too many times before.  The Republicans are almost always irrelevant, but they win anyway<br />  </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:39:10 +0000 Ramona comment 203182 at http://dagblog.com