dagblog - Comments for "Back from Iowa, O’Malley meets with donors" http://dagblog.com/node/19435 Comments for "Back from Iowa, O’Malley meets with donors" en That's a somewhat misleading http://dagblog.com/comment/206288#comment-206288 <a id="comment-206288"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206285#comment-206285">Yes, if that&#039;s the worse</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's a somewhat misleading headline. Klein argues that Clinton has been essentially drafted through an invisible primary by the "Democratic Party elites" and "powerbrokers", thereby rendering even strong opposition unnecessary. So ... the bench may be deep but they're not being called on to play. That may not be the best plan, as his last sentence states -</p><p></p><blockquote>The skills necessary to win over party elites may not be the skills necessary to win the election -- and if Hillary doesn't face strong opposition in the visible primary, Democrats may not find that out until too late.</blockquote><p> </p></div></div></div> Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:52:18 +0000 barefooted comment 206288 at http://dagblog.com Yes, if that's the worse http://dagblog.com/comment/206285#comment-206285 <a id="comment-206285"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206282#comment-206282">Of course it&#039;s a simplistic</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, if that's the worse thing said by any democrat about the other democrats it will be the sweetest kindest primary in the history of America.</p> <p>Democrats have a very strong roster that could run for president and in every way be better than all the possible republican candidates. They're not well known because most have decided not to run or to run not very publicly active campaigns. Most of the dems prominent enough to run have decided they can't win. I agree with this Klein article"</p> <p><a href="http://www.vox.com/2015/3/13/8203605/hillary-clinton-isn-t-running-unopposed-she-s-just-crushing-the">Hillary Clinton isn’t running unopposed. She’s just crushing the competition.</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:46:50 +0000 ocean-kat comment 206285 at http://dagblog.com Of course it's a simplistic http://dagblog.com/comment/206282#comment-206282 <a id="comment-206282"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206278#comment-206278">From my side it just makes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Of course it's a simplistic remark, but it doesn't come close to "moronic Hillary slamming". Be patient, I'm sure there will be plenty of that to complain about before long.</p><p>Why there are seemingly no other truly competent Democratic leaders is an excellent question. The so- called inevitability may have begun in 2008 and is simply being fulfilled - a rather depressing possibility. If Hillary was not running, would the Democrats have a stronger roster than the Republicans?</p><p></p></div></div></div> Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:31:32 +0000 barefooted comment 206282 at http://dagblog.com From my side it just makes http://dagblog.com/comment/206278#comment-206278 <a id="comment-206278"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206274#comment-206274">&quot;Let&#039;s be honest here, the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>From my side it just makes him a simplistic ass. I'm happy to listen to someone with something intelligent to say, and I'm pretty incredulous that it's 2015 and still Hillary-on-the-scene since 1988 or 1992 is the only reasonable contender. But the last thing I want is a return to the moronic Hillary-slamming of 2008. She has enough real flaws - if this guy wants to be serious, let him start there.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Mar 2015 21:08:27 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 206278 at http://dagblog.com "Let's be honest here, the http://dagblog.com/comment/206274#comment-206274 <a id="comment-206274"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206272#comment-206272">Well O&#039;Malley blew it with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><i>"Let's be honest here, the presidency is not some crown to be passed between two families."</i></p><p>At most, that's a feather-finger push at both Clinton <i>and</i> Bush. If he's serious about running for the nomination he's going to have to get a whole lot tougher than that.</p><p></p></div></div></div> Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:11:22 +0000 barefooted comment 206274 at http://dagblog.com It's to early to tell what http://dagblog.com/comment/206273#comment-206273 <a id="comment-206273"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206272#comment-206272">Well O&#039;Malley blew it with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's to early to tell what could happen. Hillary could screw up. O'Malley could recover from this faux pas. Obama survived his clinging to guns comment and then survived a lackluster first debate against Romney. It is still Hillary Clinton's race to lose though.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:36:37 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 206273 at http://dagblog.com Well O'Malley blew it with http://dagblog.com/comment/206272#comment-206272 <a id="comment-206272"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/node/19435">Back from Iowa, O’Malley meets with donors</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well O'Malley blew it with <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/29/martin-omalley-presidency_n_6964338.html">the Clinton crown comment</a>. A snippy slight he didn't need to offer up, and rather insulting to women at the same time.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:22:53 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 206272 at http://dagblog.com Maybe a couple more will jump http://dagblog.com/comment/206111#comment-206111 <a id="comment-206111"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206099#comment-206099">I meant it in a positive way.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe a couple more will jump in the fray this summer for the Democratic Party.  I personally think they start campaigning too early.  I don't know if I can tolerate all the GOP nonsense like they did through their 2012 primary.  That primary was a national embarrassment. </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:43:37 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 206111 at http://dagblog.com I meant it in a positive way. http://dagblog.com/comment/206099#comment-206099 <a id="comment-206099"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206095#comment-206095">You made me laugh.  I still</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I meant it in a positive way.</p> <p>While not thrilled about some of her stances, overall positive.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:34:36 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 206099 at http://dagblog.com Great quote.  It is still http://dagblog.com/comment/206098#comment-206098 <a id="comment-206098"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206097#comment-206097">PP, you know, It&#039;s not a bad</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Great quote.  It is still true today. </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:26:45 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 206098 at http://dagblog.com