dagblog - Comments for "Religious Freedom? I Think Not." http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/religious-freedom-i-think-not-19485 Comments for "Religious Freedom? I Think Not." en Here's a tidbit for handling http://dagblog.com/comment/207232#comment-207232 <a id="comment-207232"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/religious-freedom-i-think-not-19485">Religious Freedom? I Think Not.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here's a tidbit for handling someone of strong religious faith which they mean to impact upon you.</p> <p> </p> <p>All christian religious ritual is based on old pagan Roman diety worship. What we see today is exactly how they worshipped back when Constantine declared christianity as the state religion of Rome. So they just transferred the old props used for the pagan gods for the new one God of State. </p> <p> </p> <p>Just a little something I picked up from an archeologist in Europe who as excavating old Celt sites. </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:24:16 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 207232 at http://dagblog.com In the Federalist Papers, http://dagblog.com/comment/207230#comment-207230 <a id="comment-207230"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/religious-freedom-i-think-not-19485">Religious Freedom? I Think Not.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size:14px">In the Federalist Papers, Essay 10 by Madison, 2nd to the last paragraph so states ...</span></p> <p><span style="font-size:16px">A religious sect may degenerate into a political faction in a part of the Confederacy; but the variety of sects dispersed over the entire face of it must secure the national councils against any danger from that source.</span><span style="font-size:16px"> </span></p> <p><span style="font-size:14px">Madison assumes a confederation of religious elders would keep all religious factions at bay because if one religious group attains political power, those in conflict with their doctrine would be in peril. So while it addresses the question of how to guard against <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_faction" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(6, 69, 173); background-image: none; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: initial; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; " title="Political faction">f</a>actions, or groups of citizens, with interests contrary to the rights of others or the interests of the whole community, it fails to recognize multiple religious factions entering into a conspiracy to promote their religious christian views upon others at the state and national level. I believe he felt that being given to right to practice their beliefs without the heavy hand of the government on them would be an incentive to refrain from entering the political arena.</span></p> <p> </p> <p><span style="font-size:14px">As for the God/Jesus hang up, it wasn't until the end of the 1800's when someone made the connection God and Jesus were one in the same. In fact, most of the people  involved with the Constitution approval process did believe in God, but you won't find a reference they believed Jesus was God.</span></p> <p> </p> <p><span style="font-size:14px">And article about baking two cakes reminds me of a town in Pakistan along the Indus river with an inscription at the town gate from Jesus, which says ...</span></p> <p><span style="font-size:14px"> ... The Earth is a bridge to heaven. Build no house upon it ...</span></p> <p><span style="font-size:14px">Seems to be a christian means you have to have a poor understanding of language.</span></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:13:58 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 207230 at http://dagblog.com I don't know that I saw a http://dagblog.com/comment/207161#comment-207161 <a id="comment-207161"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207148#comment-207148">I see a Christian painting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't know that I saw a sacrifice to Molek, but I did note Druid influence, adulterating what one would assume is a picture of the authors Christian associates.</p> <p>Why would anyone care about considering the morality, God expects from his servants, when it <span style="line-height:1.6">is obvious, many </span><span style="line-height:1.6">don't</span><span style="line-height:1.6"> really </span><span style="line-height:1.6">care, </span><span style="line-height:1.6">that God abhors </span><span style="line-height:1.6">Idols.</span></p> <p><span style="line-height:1.6">For all that matters to some, is that it makes the group happy</span><span style="line-height:1.6"> and they can call themselves </span><span style="line-height:1.6">Christians. (</span>CINO<span style="line-height:1.6">)</span><span style="line-height:1.6"> </span></p> <p><span style="line-height:1.6">Hypocrites. </span></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 22 Apr 2015 02:25:35 +0000 Resistance comment 207161 at http://dagblog.com I see a Christian painting http://dagblog.com/comment/207148#comment-207148 <a id="comment-207148"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207144#comment-207144"> they are losing the moral</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I see a Christian painting and candles. </p> <p>Do you see a child sacrifice to Molek?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Apr 2015 22:14:53 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 207148 at http://dagblog.com  they are losing the moral http://dagblog.com/comment/207144#comment-207144 <a id="comment-207144"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207135#comment-207135">Here is a view of the current</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px"> they are losing the moral war</span></p> </blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px">Most Christian faiths have already adulterated Gods word, leading to the loss of morality and all sorts of injurious things.    </span></p> <p><span style="font-size:13px">In the link you provided; Is that an idol in the picture, with sacrificial smoke? </span></p> <blockquote> <p><strong>The Ten Commandments</strong></p> <p>20 …. <strong>4 </strong><a href="http://www.esvbible.org/Lv26.1%3BDe27.15%3BPs97.7%3BAc17.29/"><em>d</em></a>“<strong><u>You shall not make</u></strong> for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. <strong>5 </strong><strong><u><a href="http://www.esvbible.org/Ex23.24%3BJos23.7/"><em>e</em></a>You shall not bow down</u></strong> to them or serve them, for I the Lord your God am <a href="http://www.esvbible.org/Ex34.14%3BDe4.24%3BDe6.15%3BJos24.19%3BNah1.2/"><em>f</em></a>a jealous God, ……….</p> <p><a href="http://www.esvbible.org/Exodus%2020:1-5/">Exodus 20:1-5</a></p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Apr 2015 22:00:05 +0000 Resistance comment 207144 at http://dagblog.com Here is a view of the current http://dagblog.com/comment/207135#comment-207135 <a id="comment-207135"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/religious-freedom-i-think-not-19485">Religious Freedom? I Think Not.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here is a view of the current battles being waged by Conservative Christians making clear that they know that they are losing the moral war. you may find it encouraging.</p> <p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vr-marianne-zahn/traditional-worship-is-the-future_b_7090656.html?utm_hp_ref=religion">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vr-marianne-zahn/traditional-worship-is-th...</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:27:02 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 207135 at http://dagblog.com I most certainly fall into http://dagblog.com/comment/206812#comment-206812 <a id="comment-206812"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206802#comment-206802">Just great, Stilli.  Yes, be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I most certainly fall into the former, Ramona. </p> <p>It is imperative that we keep the separation between church and state. So much evil has been done in the name of religion.</p> <p>I keep harping that freedom OF religion also means freedom FROM religion. If we are to be truly free in this country, no one can be forced to accept the tenants of the religion of anyone else. The leaders of our country should tend to the business of leading the country and leave us to practice our religions the way we see fit (or not at all,) within the confines of the law. This mixing cannot have a happy ending, and we will, in fact, lose the republic our forefathers worked so hard to give us. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 13 Apr 2015 03:50:08 +0000 stillidealistic comment 206812 at http://dagblog.com Just great, Stilli.  Yes, be http://dagblog.com/comment/206802#comment-206802 <a id="comment-206802"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/religious-freedom-i-think-not-19485">Religious Freedom? I Think Not.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Just great, Stilli.  Yes, be careful what you <s>ask for</s> demand.  I divide Christians into two factions.  There are the Christians who practice their faith and don't feel the need to force anyone else to practice it, too, and then there is the "Christian" Right who long ago saw that simply usurping the word "Christian" gave them all the power they needed. </p> <p>They deserve no respect.  We need to keep reminding them of that.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:18:22 +0000 Ramona comment 206802 at http://dagblog.com Oxy, I think it's all about http://dagblog.com/comment/206770#comment-206770 <a id="comment-206770"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/206768#comment-206768">Thanks, Stilli. &quot;Bake for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oxy, I think it's all about going above and beyond what is required. I am sickened by the way the "Christian right" is behaving, and I'm looking for a wake up call wherever I can find it - something has GOT to bring them back to their senses. </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Apr 2015 06:23:06 +0000 stillidealistic comment 206770 at http://dagblog.com Thanks, Stilli. "Bake for http://dagblog.com/comment/206768#comment-206768 <a id="comment-206768"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/religious-freedom-i-think-not-19485">Religious Freedom? I Think Not.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks, Stilli. "Bake for them two"---what a terrific analogy and perhaps something which can break through this latter day hypocrisy.</p> <p>Edit to add: And then I reconsidered. Even that approach is a little suspect. Why not just bake the one cake and get on with life.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Apr 2015 03:44:09 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 206768 at http://dagblog.com