dagblog - Comments for "FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades"

Holder is running one of the

trkingmomoe — Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:39:00 +0000

In reply to FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades

Holder is running one of the best Justice Dept. in my life time. Just how many people have been prosecuted for crimes they didn't commit? How many of them were minorities? It is time to get rid of capital punishment.

Besides Bones and CSI and a

Richard Day — Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:23:36 +0000

In reply to FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades

Besides Bones and CSI and a host of other TV programs, we get the idea that science will out. hahahaha

No.

And facial recognition programs cannot ever work like they do on TV for heaven's sake.

There are problems with just DNA analysis alone.

Oh, and there are time problems, which TV and film must forget.

How much money is available for scientific analysis anyway? Maybe if we become less of a totalitarian society, putting away more prisoners than anywhere else in the world?

Thank you.

The FBI has not faced real

rmrd0000 — Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:49:43 +0000

In reply to FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades

The FBI has not faced real scrutiny in recent years. No FBI officer has faced charges for any shooting. Even when a friend of the Boston bombers was killed by an FBI agent while being questioned, it received brief media attention.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-agent-cleared-...

How could a person being interviewed get to a weapon when surrounded by FBI and police? We have to realize, unless there is an ongoing review process, law enforcement cannot be trusted. Every part of law enforcement has to be scrutinized. The fact that hair analysis is flawed is no surprise.