dagblog - Comments for "You&#039;re So Vain" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/youre-so-vain-19559 Comments for "You're So Vain" en Thanks for the kind words. I http://dagblog.com/comment/207915#comment-207915 <a id="comment-207915"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207911#comment-207911">This is delightful.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for the kind words. I could see Carlin rifting off this and turning it into actual great work of comedic art.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 May 2015 14:58:28 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 207915 at http://dagblog.com This is delightful. http://dagblog.com/comment/207911#comment-207911 <a id="comment-207911"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/youre-so-vain-19559">You&#039;re So Vain</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is delightful.</p> <p>Of course I have already written my apology. hahahahah</p> <p>I was off line for a week or so.</p> <p>This is art!</p> <p>What the hell do I know about art?</p> <p>I know it when I see it.</p> <p>I could not figure out how you ended up commenting on my post.</p> <p>I still do not understand it.</p> <p>But this post is artistic.</p> <p>That is all I got.</p> <p>V anity!</p> <p>Reminds me of Carlin talking about 'stuff'.</p> <p>Thank you for coming back.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 15 May 2015 02:54:44 +0000 Richard Day comment 207911 at http://dagblog.com Taking pride in one's self http://dagblog.com/comment/207874#comment-207874 <a id="comment-207874"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207873#comment-207873">But weren&#039;t the Clash about</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Taking pride in one's self and looks, or fleeing to the countryside to be more in touch with Mother Earth if this pride is not excessive, which would include a sense of superiority to others and intense self absorption to point of losing empathy of others. I wouldn't consider someone being a Buddhist and retreating to monastery to meditate, although there are those who do so motivated in part by vanity.</p> <p>I don't like Vanity Fair or all those magazines that push what I would consider a vanity view of one's self in the world.</p> <p>Of course all of us are vain and self-absorbed to some degree. Pride, after al, is one of seven deadly sins.</p> <p>And while I like that this post received so many "reads," but I don't think that means I am better writer than someone whose blog had 200 reads. In fact the one with 200 reads may not only better written, but also more illuminating or informative than the one with over 1000 reads. But there is the notion of influence: Which has more influence Fox News or MSNBC? The point is becoming vain as a result of some accomplishment or attribute (good looks, high IQ) is a struggle to fight off. It is so easy to slip into the self-absorbed and superiority mindset.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 May 2015 13:16:01 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 207874 at http://dagblog.com But weren't the Clash about http://dagblog.com/comment/207873#comment-207873 <a id="comment-207873"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207871#comment-207871">in both the Stones&#039; and Clash</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>But weren't the Clash about Revolution Porn, a certain kind of defending-the-downtrodden vanity? They were great as a band but they were posers - like so much of human ambition. Starbucks is as vain as any small salon. But then so were many of those liberal hippie children fleeing to pristine pastures of rural America and small colleges and the back-to-the-earth stock. It's more amusing that people profess to embrace vanity rather than deny it, and of course hair salons are all about self-embellishment, no? Vanity mirrors are just that. Vanity Fair is all about fashion - I don't even know where to begin, so I will end. But yes, incredible that a post on vanity got so many reads - you must be preening at the thought of it.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 May 2015 12:56:31 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 207873 at http://dagblog.com in both the Stones' and Clash http://dagblog.com/comment/207871#comment-207871 <a id="comment-207871"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207869#comment-207869">I&#039;m just writing lines of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>in both the Stones' and Clash's songs,the word "vain" was used in a non-ironic way. Both of them were songs about how their efforts for love were, so to speak, all in vain, or in other words: to no avail, fruitless, futile. It was this definition of the word that was used in the phrase: "it's hard to tell when all your blog's in vain." My assumption is this was not written ironically, which would be that the Anonymous PP was saying my blog was successful, fruitful and worthwhile.</p> <p>If you believe that "it's hard to tell when all your blog's in vain" was used ironically, then you don't understand the word.</p> <p>Just because "anti-establishment" bands (and, for the record, in high school I had a poster of The Clash on my wall and this was 1980) used the word "vain" still doesn't change the intent of the store's name.</p> <p>But I think you missed the whole point that the store's name, regardless of what their intention was for naming it, was<em> <strong>for me was symbolic</strong></em> of what I don't like about cities, snd a culture that embraces a hedonistic perspective.</p> <p>[the phrase, it's hard to tell when all your blog's in vain, may have been written ironically since as of this moment this blog has <em>1053 reads</em>, which are not all unique readers, but still a good number of read.]</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 May 2015 11:42:30 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 207871 at http://dagblog.com I'm just writing lines of http://dagblog.com/comment/207869#comment-207869 <a id="comment-207869"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207868#comment-207868">So a beauty salon is telling</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm just writing lines of Rolling Stones songs - what are you trying to do?</p> <p>You don't need a weather vein to know which way the blog rolls</p> <p>Vein it Black</p> <p>Kurt Covein - smells like teen spirit (aka Francis Farmer will spread her vanity on Seattle</p> <p>Prince Vanity 6?</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="255px" width="427px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="255px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bfLZfyphg0M" width="427px"></iframe></div> <p>Christina Aguilera - Vanity?</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="255px" width="427px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="255px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gjfA9TzjALs" width="427px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 May 2015 10:27:18 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 207869 at http://dagblog.com So a beauty salon is telling http://dagblog.com/comment/207868#comment-207868 <a id="comment-207868"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207867#comment-207867">I take it you&#039;re not too</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So a beauty salon is telling potential customers "Come on in, but your attempt to look more attractive or be more stylish will all be in vain"? I doubt it.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 May 2015 22:41:55 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 207868 at http://dagblog.com I take it you're not too http://dagblog.com/comment/207867#comment-207867 <a id="comment-207867"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207864#comment-207864">I seriously doubt they meant</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">I take it you're not too phamiliar with rolling stones discography - have a look at Let it Bleed somewhere between Monkey Man and Country Honk ( the precursor to Honky Tonk Women). <a href="http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jKsY4N9eoRc">http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jKsY4N9eoRc</a> then The Clash did their Train in Vain.<a href="http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eNot47WRBFk">http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eNot47WRBFk</a> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 May 2015 22:16:05 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 207867 at http://dagblog.com The reason I left Portland http://dagblog.com/comment/207865#comment-207865 <a id="comment-207865"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207857#comment-207857">LOL, Ballard is the worst! </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The reason I left Portland and one of the facets of Seattle I don;t like is what  <em>I perceived </em>as people being conceited, looking down their noses at every one not like them. Actually one of the worst group of people I've encountered in this manner are Dead Heads. But in this society nothing gives a sense of superiority is being high on economic ladder. Throw in the hipsters and it is thrown in your face just about everywhere. The one thing I found refreshing about living in the Midwest was the self-deprecating perspective.</p> <p>So the name of the place was <em>symbolic </em>to me. Others may feel differenty.</p> <p>And, yes, change is inevitable. The cool thing is that if the change is not to one's liking, or the negatives outweigh the positives, one can move to somewhere more to their liking.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 May 2015 21:15:15 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 207865 at http://dagblog.com I seriously doubt they meant http://dagblog.com/comment/207864#comment-207864 <a id="comment-207864"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/207860#comment-207860">It&#039;s hard to tell, it&#039;s hard</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I seriously doubt they meant that patronizing their store as an act of futility.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 May 2015 20:53:16 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 207864 at http://dagblog.com