dagblog - Comments for "False Consciousness isn&#039;t False" http://dagblog.com/false-consciousness-isnt-false-19586 Comments for "False Consciousness isn't False" en Yes, we agree on your http://dagblog.com/comment/208137#comment-208137 <a id="comment-208137"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/208119#comment-208119">We can agree on the Gerard</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, we agree on your Sancerre Pinot</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 23 May 2015 01:35:30 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 208137 at http://dagblog.com Oxy Mora - a "free trade" http://dagblog.com/comment/208134#comment-208134 <a id="comment-208134"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/208132#comment-208132">Hal, one of the definitions</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oxy Mora - a "free trade" deal coupled with higher minimum wages might lead to higher unemployment since the mandated higher wages here would make production in low-wage countries that much more attractive.  It is true that some service industries like fast food can't be off-shored but retail can certainly be - think of all the items we can buy online these days that are shipped to us from China.  I just don't see how we can benefit from a deal that puts more American workers in direct competition with laborers who are paid sub $1/hour.  In Krugman's latest <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/opinion/paul-krugman-trade-and-trust.html">column</a>, , dated today, he is about as critical of the TPP as he has ever been of a trade deal. Honestly though his criticisms are somewhat different than mine although there is overlap.<br /><br /> Regarding the two conflicting ideas at once, I agree with you that it is quite possible to view your country's interests as somewhat different than your own.  Some wealthy individuals, like Warren Buffett, have argued for higher taxes on themselves.  But the Pew Poll says that most Americans don't think trade deals lead to higher salaries or more jobs in the aggregate.  Yet, we still believe they're in our best interests.  I maintain my original position that it is paradoxical to conclude a trade deal that does not lead to higher wages or more jobs for Americans as in America's best interest.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 22 May 2015 23:41:11 +0000 HSG comment 208134 at http://dagblog.com Hal, one of the definitions http://dagblog.com/comment/208132#comment-208132 <a id="comment-208132"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/false-consciousness-isnt-false-19586">False Consciousness isn&#039;t False</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hal, one of the definitions of <u>true</u> intelligence is to be able to hold two seemingly countervailing views in mind at the same time. For example, I might think both things at once--- overall the trade deal is good, along with it won't necessarily create jobs or raise wages.</p> <p>As we were discussing on another thread, pardon me, the direct labor jobs may not be where the operatives are in terms of the broader positive economic effects of the trade deal.</p> <p>Part of the reason I keep taking you up on these trade blogs is that if one combined the possible positive effects of the deal with worthwhile associated reforms, like higher minimum wages, it would be better than just harping on how bad this deal is.    </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 22 May 2015 23:10:52 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 208132 at http://dagblog.com We can agree on the Gerard http://dagblog.com/comment/208119#comment-208119 <a id="comment-208119"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/208117#comment-208117">I was actually guessing what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We can agree on the Gerard Bertrand Domaine de L’Aigle Pinot Noir 2009 Pays d’Oc,? </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 22 May 2015 04:20:00 +0000 NCD comment 208119 at http://dagblog.com I was actually guessing what http://dagblog.com/comment/208117#comment-208117 <a id="comment-208117"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/208115#comment-208115">Sancerre rouge from the mid</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was actually guessing what Michael was tasting, betting it was a Burgundy Pinot Noir</p> <p>If you tasted a Sancerre rouge, you have my sympathy.</p> <p>However, I will admit to tasting a Greek Retsina. the later wine is stored in pine resin as a preservative,  practice dating back to ancient Roman times. Your pinot could not have been worse.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 22 May 2015 02:48:30 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 208117 at http://dagblog.com Sancerre rouge from the mid http://dagblog.com/comment/208115#comment-208115 <a id="comment-208115"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/208113#comment-208113">I&#039;m betting that it was an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sancerre rouge from the mid to higher elevations of the Loire Valley in years of copious spring rains followed by cool dry weather are fine choices, 1998 was a very good year.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 21 May 2015 23:47:02 +0000 NCD comment 208115 at http://dagblog.com I'm betting that it was an http://dagblog.com/comment/208113#comment-208113 <a id="comment-208113"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/208112#comment-208112">I trust the wine was not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm betting that it was an AOC/ AOP from Burgundy</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 21 May 2015 19:13:49 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 208113 at http://dagblog.com I trust the wine was not http://dagblog.com/comment/208112#comment-208112 <a id="comment-208112"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/208098#comment-208098">My reaction to this is that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I trust the wine was not Gerard Bertrand Domaine de L’Aigle Pinot Noir 2009 Pays d’Oc,? </p> <p>Absolute bilge water, enough to make one crave a tankard of Gallo.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 21 May 2015 18:02:30 +0000 NCD comment 208112 at http://dagblog.com Michael - relatively http://dagblog.com/comment/208107#comment-208107 <a id="comment-208107"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/208098#comment-208098">My reaction to this is that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Michael - relatively unfettered international trade among high-wage representative democracies, like Canada, EU members, and the US, can truly be mutually beneficial.  My focus is on the paradox that most Americans see free trade with low wage autocratic countries as benefiting America even though we recognize that it does not lead to more jobs or a higher income.  Yes, we do get cheap iPhones from China but the total number of Americans in poverty has never been higher and the percentage is creeping back to pre-LBJ levels.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 21 May 2015 13:01:14 +0000 HSG comment 208107 at http://dagblog.com I am going to add this video http://dagblog.com/comment/208104#comment-208104 <a id="comment-208104"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/false-consciousness-isnt-false-19586">False Consciousness isn&#039;t False</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am going to add this video here of a interview with Paul Krugman. I think it is from a couple of years ago. Everything he says rings true today.  Towards the end he will give his opinion on why people have been clinging to this far right ideology so it does tie into this discussion. He covers lots of history as to why we are were we are now. It is a hour long but worth the time to listen too. </p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="281px" width="500px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="281px" mozallowfullscreen="" src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/44480652" webkitallowfullscreen="" width="500px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 21 May 2015 06:59:12 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 208104 at http://dagblog.com