dagblog - Comments for "Guys, Hillary Clinton Is Going To Be A Great President" http://dagblog.com/guys-hillary-clinton-going-be-great-president-19850 Comments for "Guys, Hillary Clinton Is Going To Be A Great President" en There were a number of http://dagblog.com/comment/212320#comment-212320 <a id="comment-212320"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212228#comment-212228">On foreign policy, I think we</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There were a number of indications that Hillary didn't have final say on all of State appointees. Whether she backed Nuland, I don't know. If she backed Nuland, does that make her 1 with Robert Kagan?  James Carville seems to be married to Mary Matalin without becoming a neocon.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:11:52 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 212320 at http://dagblog.com Yes, in Vermont. Maybe it's http://dagblog.com/comment/212317#comment-212317 <a id="comment-212317"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212238#comment-212238">I was referring to the phrase</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, in Vermont. Maybe it's about the only way a Democratic Socialist makes it to the White House; he's insulated in a safe backwater where he is free to beat a progressive drum, steadily and consistently for thirty years until the moment catches up with him.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Sep 2015 06:48:56 +0000 kyle flynn comment 212317 at http://dagblog.com And he sidelined her for the http://dagblog.com/comment/212264#comment-212264 <a id="comment-212264"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212259#comment-212259">I think you&#039;re right.  I also</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">And he sidelined her for the rest of his tenure.</div></div></div> Tue, 01 Sep 2015 03:34:34 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 212264 at http://dagblog.com I respond that it clearly isn http://dagblog.com/comment/212261#comment-212261 <a id="comment-212261"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212202#comment-212202">How will you respond to the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I respond that it clearly isn't valid. Bernie is running as a Democrat and he most certainly 'can' win the general.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Sep 2015 02:57:41 +0000 synchronicity comment 212261 at http://dagblog.com I think you're right.  I also http://dagblog.com/comment/212259#comment-212259 <a id="comment-212259"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212258#comment-212258">By all reports from several</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think you're right.  I also think politicians at this level hold far fewer grudges than we think. They know the game. They also know what it takes to get things done.  With Hillary, Obama got a great SoS, healed whatever parts of the party needed healing, and got access to the Clinton network of people who were, after 8 years of Busg in the White House, the last group of Democrats with high level federal experience to draw from, outside the hired bureaucracy.  She didn't extract anything from him and he benefited from his good sense.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Sep 2015 01:07:49 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 212259 at http://dagblog.com By all reports from several http://dagblog.com/comment/212258#comment-212258 <a id="comment-212258"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212230#comment-212230">She got her pound of flesh. </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>By all reports from several sources including Obama himself Hillary did not want to be Secretary of State. Obama repeatedly sought her out and convinced her to be his S of S. We cannot know his reasoning. Perhaps he really did think she would make the best S of S. Perhaps he did it to heal the party after a bitter primary battle. Who knows, but your claim that she got her pound of flesh is <s>fallacious</s> bullshit.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:35:12 +0000 ocean-kat comment 212258 at http://dagblog.com Democrats were also guilty of http://dagblog.com/comment/212254#comment-212254 <a id="comment-212254"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212241#comment-212241">No one has mentioned that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Democrats were also guilty of obstructionism by blocking critical legislation</p> <p><span style="line-height:1.6">When the nation had a chance to discourage millions of illegals from crossing the border by enacting E-Verify; the Democrats were not interested in any legislation to resolve an issue, many Americans saw as a future problem. </span></p> <p>Now the Nation is faced with the problem the Democrats created, when they turned a blind eye to the 11 million +illegals,</p> <p>The Democrats never saw the illegals as a problem, Amnesty was always their goal. </p> <p><span style="line-height:1.6">Who didn't see what the Democrats obstructionist plans would lead too. </span><span style="line-height:1.6">Amnesty</span><span style="line-height:1.6"> </span><span style="line-height:1.6"> </span></p> <p><span style="line-height:1.6">If the Democrats decry deportation loud enough their objective of Amnesty is still accomplished </span></p> <p><span style="line-height:1.6">For the Democrats, it's either their way or they obstruct.</span></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:06 +0000 Resistance comment 212254 at http://dagblog.com I fear I must dissent from http://dagblog.com/comment/212248#comment-212248 <a id="comment-212248"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212240#comment-212240">I said it already - I think</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I fear I must dissent from the view that her vote in October, 2002 was right. If she didn't know that the resolution made war inevitable, she should have.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:40:29 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 212248 at http://dagblog.com I agree, Eric, our bench http://dagblog.com/comment/212242#comment-212242 <a id="comment-212242"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212219#comment-212219">Thank you for a highly</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree, Eric, our bench looks really good.  The debates will be issue oriented and informative. I have followed many of them and their speeches are sane with good reasoning.  I may not agree with some of it but compared to the ranting of the Koch Party, we should have a good election.  I am hoping that there will be some long coat tails for congress. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 31 Aug 2015 20:20:23 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 212242 at http://dagblog.com No one has mentioned that http://dagblog.com/comment/212241#comment-212241 <a id="comment-212241"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/guys-hillary-clinton-going-be-great-president-19850">Guys, Hillary Clinton Is Going To Be A Great President</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No one has mentioned that Republicans in Congress prime directive will be to ensure the failure of any Democrat administration with help from corporate controlled both siderist MSM. Hillary has the most experience in dealing with the GOP nihilists and obstructionists.</p> <p>Preventing the election of, or blocking policy of, a self proclaimed socialist with no federal executive experience would be more easily accomplished by the Republican mafia like machine.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:40:10 +0000 NCD comment 212241 at http://dagblog.com