dagblog - Comments for "Sanders leads Clinton by 9 points in NH, gains ground in IA" http://dagblog.com/link/sanders-leads-clinton-9-points-nh-gains-ground-ia-19871 Comments for "Sanders leads Clinton by 9 points in NH, gains ground in IA" en I agree with PP that Biden is http://dagblog.com/comment/212666#comment-212666 <a id="comment-212666"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212662#comment-212662">Oh my, Warren&#039;s 15 minutes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree with PP that Biden is not a good at running on a national level.  He has tried before and each time he never got out of the single digits in the poles. </p> <p>The bump he has in the poles right now is from just the media making a big deal out of it.  If he gets in, the poles will settle  back down  Yes his mouth will get him in trouble.  It always does. </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Sep 2015 22:44:04 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 212666 at http://dagblog.com Would put his mother to sleep http://dagblog.com/comment/212664#comment-212664 <a id="comment-212664"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212662#comment-212662">Oh my, Warren&#039;s 15 minutes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Would put his mother to sleep.</em></p> <p>That's very unfair to Biden. I'm sure he would make some buffoonish comment on the campaign trail and we would all wake up and laugh or cringe.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Sep 2015 21:35:23 +0000 ocean-kat comment 212664 at http://dagblog.com All this speculation about http://dagblog.com/comment/212663#comment-212663 <a id="comment-212663"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212660#comment-212660">I don&#039;t know what to make of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>All this speculation about Warren seems crazy to me. If Warren would not endorse Hillary or Sanders why would she endorse Biden by agreeing to be his vp before the primary vote? Biden is as much a centrist as Hillary, imo slightly to the right of Hillary. Sanders is by far the closest to Warren politically. The liberals that support Sanders are mostly the same liberals that support Warren. Her endorsement of Biden over Sanders would be seen as a betrayal of her principles by Sanders supporters. Would Sanders supporters leave him for a Warren vp? For that reason I'm not at all sure it would help Biden that much and I think it would hurt her.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Sep 2015 21:17:50 +0000 ocean-kat comment 212663 at http://dagblog.com Oh my, Warren's 15 minutes http://dagblog.com/comment/212662#comment-212662 <a id="comment-212662"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212660#comment-212660">I don&#039;t know what to make of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Oh my, Warren's 15 minutes are over. All this is a game. Murdoch &amp; kin are making a ton of money off this faux contest. Biden? Worst candidate ever. Would put his mother to sleep.</div></div></div> Wed, 09 Sep 2015 21:05:53 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 212662 at http://dagblog.com I don't know what to make of http://dagblog.com/comment/212660#comment-212660 <a id="comment-212660"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212635#comment-212635">First off DNC would be fools</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't know what to make of this but Biden is beating Sanders in the latest national poll and he isn't yet a candidate. HRC still leads by a strong margin but if Warren joins Biden as VP all bets are off.</p> <p>It's convenient that the Sandernistas have already printed hit pieces aimed at Radical Leftist Purists, for not feeling the Bern, so they already have convenient scapegoats to project their failure onto.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:20:47 +0000 Peter comment 212660 at http://dagblog.com Thanks! ~arc http://dagblog.com/comment/212636#comment-212636 <a id="comment-212636"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212635#comment-212635">First off DNC would be fools</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks!</p> <p>~arc</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Sep 2015 08:15:13 +0000 arc comment 212636 at http://dagblog.com First off DNC would be fools http://dagblog.com/comment/212635#comment-212635 <a id="comment-212635"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212612#comment-212612">Re this link</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>First off DNC would be fools to go against the winner of the primaries and caucuses. That would anger voters and many would sit out the election.  The last time we had a brokered convention was in the 1950's.  JFK's successes in entering in state primaries even as a write in vote ended the practice of party bosses picking the top of the ticket. People wanted more say because of modern media and could watch the candidates on Television. Many states that had caucuses then moved away from caucuses and into state run primaries. We only have a few states that still let the parties run and finance their own caucuses to chose who to give their convention votes to. The parties still have rules for brokered conventions but there has to be a serious reason for them to do that. They will nominate the primary winner. </p> <p>These very early endorsements came because they didn't see how strong Sanders would be. Super delegates have been known to change their minds so it is not set in stone.  Most of what you are reading is horse race stuff that the media likes to play around with.  </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Sep 2015 07:40:58 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 212635 at http://dagblog.com Re this link http://dagblog.com/comment/212612#comment-212612 <a id="comment-212612"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/212535#comment-212535">2 more, one old one new,from</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Re this link</p> <p><a href="http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/">http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/</a></p> <p>can someone explain to me, because I really don't know, what happens if Hillary gets all the endorsements and Bernie wins the electoral vote?  Does the DNC have the final say?</p> <p>Thanks -</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 08 Sep 2015 23:00:38 +0000 arc comment 212612 at http://dagblog.com Parry sounds like an http://dagblog.com/comment/212604#comment-212604 <a id="comment-212604"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/sanders-leads-clinton-9-points-nh-gains-ground-ia-19871">Sanders leads Clinton by 9 points in NH, gains ground in IA</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Parry sounds like an apologist for Assad and Putin. He refers to the "pretense" that Assad engaged in "unjustified repression". Yes, the massacre of those protestors was perfectly justified. Referring to the popular uprising against Yan-however-you-spell-it as a "coup" is tendentious, as is putting "Russian aggression" in scare quotes.  We should sometimes object to demonizing the other, but we don't always have to endorse the other's point of view.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:49:44 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 212604 at http://dagblog.com This is a clip from This Week http://dagblog.com/comment/212547#comment-212547 <a id="comment-212547"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/sanders-leads-clinton-9-points-nh-gains-ground-ia-19871">Sanders leads Clinton by 9 points in NH, gains ground in IA</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is a clip from This Week on ABC this morning.  I think this ties into this thread. </p> <p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/video/bill-kristol-biden-warren-ticket-pretty-powerful-33571718">http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/video/bill-kristol-biden-warren-ticket-pretty-powerful-33571718</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Sep 2015 23:56:18 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 212547 at http://dagblog.com