dagblog - Comments for "Danger In Donald's Name"

I was thinking of him as

PeraclesPlease — Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:46:12 +0000

In reply to Follow the bouncing ball -

I was thinking of him as Rupert Pupkin from King of Comedy.now we do marbles like Salinger's Seymour - second one's a doozy, especially in that darkened twilight hour. Remember, the Fat Lady is Christ, buddy, she's goddam Christ I tell you...

Follow the bouncing ball -

barefooted — Sat, 26 Sep 2015 05:32:01 +0000

In reply to Maybe send Donald some jacks?

Follow the bouncing ball - but only once before the stars disappear. Got 'em all! Takes practice to beat the best, but like pick-up sticks the challenge is in the numbers ...

I don't think Donald was ever a kid as we understand one to be; probably because we were never his kind of kid. Anyone who dabbles in pychobabble can see the picture that he's clearly defining, refining and claiming as his own. It's shallow and it's frightened. He's so afraid of failure that he'd rather watch the world blow up because of him than be unimportant.

Maybe send Donald some jacks?

PeraclesPlease — Sat, 26 Sep 2015 04:50:27 +0000

In reply to As for life being too short,

Maybe send Donald some jacks? Despite his billions, he's in dire need of a real life - all money's bought is anger and media attention - a raging gorilla in a cage. With a beautiful piece of ass by his side I suppose - sounds like King Kong - except he owns the Empire State building or half of Manhattan at least. All he wanted was Cecile B DeMille and instead he got Fox News. Your turn - twosies and foursies.

As for life being too short,

barefooted — Sat, 26 Sep 2015 03:01:37 +0000

In reply to It's concerning that so many

As for life being too short, and the need to break away now and then from the frustrations and over-hyping of political prostrations, I couldn't agree more. But I also recognize that sometimes nothing is more required than attention - even when others look away. The touchy part is determining when the attention crosses the line from wariness and warning to exacerbation.

PS edit - response to Peracles way up there!

Peter=Easily brainwashed..

tmccarthy0 — Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:06:25 +0000

In reply to Peter:= 'Self-attested good

Peter=Easily brainwashed.. believes Trump is a regular guy, LOLOLOLOL. It is awesome how folks like Peter are so easily manipulated by Trumpmerica propaganda

Peter:= 'Self-attested good

NCD — Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:46:31 +0000

In reply to The Birthers were an

Peter:= 'Self-attested good submissive non-voter", not Islamophobic, can posthumously discern good Muslims from bad ones, jokes about Kenyan Muslim Presidents as 'better', forecasts less Muslim bug splat with real estate mogul/reality show host as President and Commander in Chief, lifestyle independent from the racist system, annoyed with and seeks to reciprocate annoyance to liberals, believes they would pursue him to the South Pole to exasperatingly ensure his well being.

The Birthers were an

Peter — Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:09:19 +0000

In reply to Trump taps into GOP

The Birthers were an entertaining diversion that had no effect on anything of any importance. Looking back we probably would have done better if we had a Kenyan Muslim as president.

Racism is part of our system and Trump and some of his supporters show it just as some of Bernie's supporters do, Some Dems are more adept at appearing egalitarian but they will never destroy the racist system that their lifestyle depends on.

Liberals are just as islamophobic as Conservatives but they try to portray themselves as the friend of the Good Submissive Muslim while bombing the good and bad indiscriminately. Trump may be the most moderate of the candidates on this issue because we already know HRC and Sanders are hawks who love to drone bomb and turn Muslims into bug-splat..

Trump taps into GOP

rmrd0000 — Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:17 +0000

In reply to I understand that you and

Trump taps into GOP birtherism, racism, and Islamophobia.

I understand that you and

Peter — Wed, 23 Sep 2015 05:04:32 +0000

In reply to I'd love to ignore Trump and

I understand that you and others are confused and frightened by Trump;s ability to connect with disenfranchised Republican voters who are furious about the parasitic politicians who claim the sole right to represent them. There are some democrats who have the same feelings about their imposed entitled representatives.

Trump has masterfully played his opponents and the media by introducing divisive topics and allowing uncensored responses right or wrong to send his detractors into a frenzy of often undeserved personal attacks which drives his popularity even higher.

The Republican elite seem to be savvy enough to moderate their attacks on Trump because they know attacks that are viewed as unfair will drive his popularity, something they have very little of.

Liberal dems have no power to 'push back' against Trump in the primaries, they're not involved or wanted and few people who will decide on the Republican candidate care what any Liberal spouts about their leaders. In fact about 80% of voters don't listen to Liberals, even though some of them may vote with them occasionally.

When Liberals Go Wild as we are seeing today with fascist and totalitarian slurs about Trump and his supporters it just shows how weak and clueless they are, showing the majority of voters that they are not to be trusted.

I'd love to ignore Trump and

barefooted — Wed, 23 Sep 2015 02:16:23 +0000

In reply to I just think talking about or

I'd love to ignore Trump and his irresponsibly incoherent attempt to grow his penile status under the glare of media drool. Unfortunately, islamophobia is not a myth, and allowing even the most idiotic among us to gain power and stature on the back of it requires push-back.