dagblog - Comments for "IAEA Visits scary &#039;Secret Iran Nuke Site&#039; " http://dagblog.com/link/iaea-visits-scary-secret-iran-nuke-site-no-nukes-19907 Comments for "IAEA Visits scary 'Secret Iran Nuke Site' " en Iran is touchy about http://dagblog.com/comment/213289#comment-213289 <a id="comment-213289"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213283#comment-213283">&quot;The samples were taken under</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Iran is touchy about admitting international surveillance on their military site, I saw 'video' on the original BBC article I saw since removed, there is<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/21/us-iran-nuclear-iaea-idUSKCN0RL0Z020150921"> this</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>In the text of a statement to reporters, the head of safeguards at the IAEA, Tero Varjoranta, said one important element of sample-taking was that it is carried out "under redundant continuous surveillance", suggesting that the agency had carried out such surveillance when swipes were taken.</p> </blockquote> <p>I would certainly trust the IAEA when they say they know where the samples were taken, there would be no use in taking them if they didn't.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:46:15 +0000 NCD comment 213289 at http://dagblog.com "The samples were taken under http://dagblog.com/comment/213283#comment-213283 <a id="comment-213283"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213252#comment-213252">The samples were taken under</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>"The samples were taken under video surveillance by IAEA"</p> </blockquote> <p>Do you have any evidence for this?  I haven't seen any report that says this.</p> <blockquote> <p>"If the site was bulldozed it saves us a war to do it"</p> </blockquote> <p>At last we have found something we agree about!  Happy Eid!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:20:47 +0000 Lurker comment 213283 at http://dagblog.com The samples were taken under http://dagblog.com/comment/213252#comment-213252 <a id="comment-213252"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213251#comment-213251">The head of the IAEA visited</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The samples were taken under video surveillance by IAEA. If the site was bulldozed it saves us a war to do it.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:58:40 +0000 NCD comment 213252 at http://dagblog.com The head of the IAEA visited http://dagblog.com/comment/213251#comment-213251 <a id="comment-213251"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/iaea-visits-scary-secret-iran-nuke-site-no-nukes-19907">IAEA Visits scary &#039;Secret Iran Nuke Site&#039; </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The head of the IAEA visited the previously bulldozed and landscaped site, and didn't see any unusual activities.  You consider this an inspection?  There is no mention in your link about taking soil samples.  Did he carry a drilling rig in his pocket?  It doesn't even say he had a Geiger counter.</p> <p>Here are two links that say that<strong> no</strong> samples were taken by the IAEA, but they were given alleged samples taken by the Iranians.</p> <p>If you're so easy to fool, it's no wonder you believe Obama!</p> <p><a href="http://www.irna.ir/en/News/81768426/">http://www.irna.ir/en/News/81768426/</a></p> <p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/iranian-nuclear-experts-parchin-samples-without-iaea-irna-080237161.html">http://news.yahoo.com/iranian-nuclear-experts-parchin-samples-without-iaea-irna-080237161.html</a></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:33:36 +0000 Lurker comment 213251 at http://dagblog.com