dagblog - Comments for "Hillary, the TPP, and me" http://dagblog.com/hillary-tpp-and-me-19955 Comments for "Hillary, the TPP, and me" en Bernie gives lots of speeches http://dagblog.com/comment/213848#comment-213848 <a id="comment-213848"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213828#comment-213828">In the 3rd quarter, Clinton</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Bernie gives lots of speeches and raises money on the internet. Does that make him Captain Marvel? They each have their own strategy. I don't rightly give a shit.</div></div></div> Wed, 14 Oct 2015 05:29:26 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 213848 at http://dagblog.com Again, I think Sanders reaps http://dagblog.com/comment/213832#comment-213832 <a id="comment-213832"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213813#comment-213813">People are compromised to the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Again, I think Sanders reaps real political benefits from refusing corporate funds while I recognize it costs him in other ways.  Moreover, I don't see it as a purely symbolic stance the way you do.  Hillary is indeed compromised by her eagerness to accept funding from corporate interests as is every Republican.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:39:30 +0000 HSG comment 213832 at http://dagblog.com Billion dollar corporations http://dagblog.com/comment/213830#comment-213830 <a id="comment-213830"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213825#comment-213825">In my view it sucks. If a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Billion dollar corporations have a billion ways to make their voice heard.  They get what they want far more than they should.  I'm amazed you believe a CEO is entitled to a bigger voice than any one of his/her employees.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:37:35 +0000 HSG comment 213830 at http://dagblog.com I hear you.  I worry too.  http://dagblog.com/comment/213829#comment-213829 <a id="comment-213829"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213824#comment-213824">It&#039;s not a conclusion Hal. It</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I hear you.  I worry too.  But accepting corporate funding is a double-edged sword.  Part of Trump's appeal, according to his supporters, is that he is self-funding his campaign.  <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/articles/2015/10/01/donald-trumps-supporters-and-why-they-love-him">http://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/articles/2015/10/01/donald-trumps-...</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:35:37 +0000 HSG comment 213829 at http://dagblog.com In the 3rd quarter, Clinton http://dagblog.com/comment/213828#comment-213828 <a id="comment-213828"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213823#comment-213823">Hal, she&#039;s raised over $75</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In the 3rd quarter, Clinton raised $28 million, Sanders raised $26 million.  Clinton headlined 58 fundraisers during that period, Sanders held 7.  Why do you think this symbol, who is praised here for welcoming corporate funding, has to work so hard to barely outraise Sanders? <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/30/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-fundraising/">http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/30/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-fu...</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:29:00 +0000 HSG comment 213828 at http://dagblog.com In my view it sucks. If a http://dagblog.com/comment/213825#comment-213825 <a id="comment-213825"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213812#comment-213812">Corporatists still have a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">In my view it sucks. If a company's making $20 billion in profit and paying its share of taxes, it likely has some serious issues that require more attention than one man one vote idealism. It's hard to see why I should applaud union organizing but dismiss the economic and people organizing called "corporations". Why even have political parties? Too much money, too big - elections should be every man/woman for him or herself. Down with groups! Up with individuals! Workers of the World Disband! I see the light...</div></div></div> Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:10:39 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 213825 at http://dagblog.com It's not a conclusion Hal. It http://dagblog.com/comment/213824#comment-213824 <a id="comment-213824"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213820#comment-213820">I don&#039;t think there&#039;s enough</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's not a conclusion Hal. It's just something I think about and worry about. There is evidence that money plays a role in a campaign. Those expensive and imo stupid superficial tv ads actually work with the many low information voters. We'll see how it plays out.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:05:18 +0000 ocean-kat comment 213824 at http://dagblog.com Hal, she's raised over $75 http://dagblog.com/comment/213823#comment-213823 <a id="comment-213823"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213821#comment-213821">Yes but Bernie raised $26</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Hal, she's raised over $75 mill and will easily break $100m by end of year. She's rather a symbol for say half the population, and considering Obama raised $500 million and the Dems spent another billion, it's hard to understand how you think the nation's Democrats are cashed out. Wishful thinking on your part.</div></div></div> Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:59:27 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 213823 at http://dagblog.com Keith Ellison supports Bernie http://dagblog.com/comment/213822#comment-213822 <a id="comment-213822"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213820#comment-213820">I don&#039;t think there&#039;s enough</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Keith Ellison supports Bernie Sanders, but I suspect most of the Black Caucus is supporting Hillary Clinton. One Sanders gets past the two mostly white states that make the first two Primary states, he will face rejection by black voters in South Carolina as things stand now.</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/10/13/bernie-sanderss-big-black-voter-problem/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/10/13/bernie-sanders...</a></p> <p>The debates may help Sanders gain inroads with minority voters.</p> <p><a href="http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/bernie-sanderss-big-chance-to-woo-non-white-voters/">http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/bernie-sanderss-big-chance-to-woo-non...</a></p> <p>Without minority voters, Sanders can't win the Primaries or the Presidency. </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:44:56 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 213822 at http://dagblog.com Yes but Bernie raised $26 http://dagblog.com/comment/213821#comment-213821 <a id="comment-213821"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/213807#comment-213807">Last I saw, Hillary had about</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes but Bernie raised $26 million in small donations alone and can keep going back to that well.  He also does better than any other candidate (except perhaps Trump) on social media and he spends less than any other candidate.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:14:43 +0000 HSG comment 213821 at http://dagblog.com