dagblog - Comments for "PASSIVE AGRESSIVE" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/passive-agressive-20001 Comments for "PASSIVE AGRESSIVE" en There ya go! http://dagblog.com/comment/214400#comment-214400 <a id="comment-214400"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/214378#comment-214378">Bernie is demonstrating ;)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There ya go!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:31:46 +0000 Richard Day comment 214400 at http://dagblog.com Bernie is demonstrating ;) http://dagblog.com/comment/214378#comment-214378 <a id="comment-214378"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/214368#comment-214368">This is my third try until I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bernie is demonstrating ;)</p> <p>This time, on behalf of Verizon workers in NYC.  Gotta love him!</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Oct 2015 06:49:13 +0000 LisB comment 214378 at http://dagblog.com Huckabee can sit by while http://dagblog.com/comment/214369#comment-214369 <a id="comment-214369"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/214368#comment-214368">This is my third try until I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Huckabee can sit by while vote suppression occurs. He can ignore mention of putting people into slavery, but he can tell us how the Bible speaks to him.Carson and Huckabee both desire a theocracy with Biblical interpretations according to their understanding.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Oct 2015 04:06:50 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 214369 at http://dagblog.com This is my third try until I http://dagblog.com/comment/214368#comment-214368 <a id="comment-214368"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/214364#comment-214364"> </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is my third try until I get my 10 dollar mouse next week...</p> <p>Well put rmrd.</p> <p>I become speechless, at times and it is not easy for me to do so.</p> <p>I become so damned mad. And I am a white man for chrissakes! ha</p> <p>We, as a nation have a real problem whether we are in Selma or Detroit; Miami or Chicago or....</p> <p>But damn; in some places Blacks or Hispanics or even poor Whites cannot even vote; just look at Wisconsin.</p> <p>LET US PRAY...OR DEMONSTRATE!</p> <p>I had more but this is all I got right now.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:57:47 +0000 Richard Day comment 214368 at http://dagblog.com   http://dagblog.com/comment/214364#comment-214364 <a id="comment-214364"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/passive-agressive-20001">PASSIVE AGRESSIVE</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <p>Dr. Carson objects to abortion, which is fine as his personal moral position. He equates abortion to slavery. Carson notes that in slavery, a slave was forced to do what the slave owner desired. Slave women were reduced to breeding machines. If the slave master wanted a woman to have a child by a male slave chosen by the master or have a child of the master himself (also known as conception by rape), the woman had the child. Slave women had no control over their bodies. Dr. Carson wants to return to the good old days of slavery by restricting a woman's control over her body. Abortion is not like slavery, not having access to abortion is a return to the condition faced by female slaves.</p> <p>I was unaware of Huckabee's inability to realize that the radio show host was sanctioning slavery, but his response is not surprising. Huckabee is part of a segment of Christians who believe that there is no longer any racism. Black problems are the result of black's failing as Christians. Huckabee believes that the country does not have a "skin problem, we have a sin problem."</p> <p>Huckabee had an <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/20/exclusive-huckabee-campaign-video-comments-on-racial-tension-america-has-a-sin-not-skin-problem/">online ad</a> containing the same message</p> <p><span style="font-size:16px">We don’t have a skin problem in America, we have a sin problem in America. That is the root and the heart and the cause of racial strife and it cannot be reconciled by the government stepping in and making pronouncements. There is a prescription…2nd Chronicles 7:14….’If My people, who are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray, and seek My face and turn from their wicked ways’ – those are the conditions – then He says ‘He will hear from Heaven, He will forgive our sins, and He will heal our land.’ I think people forget God will heal this land, but He won’t do it if we don’t meet the conditions for Him to heal it.</span></p> <p>Bernie Sanders heard this same phrase from, <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/liberty-u-pastor-tells-bernie-sanders-that-cops-shoot-unarmed-black-people-because-of-sin-not-racism/">David Nasser</a>,  Liberty University's campus. </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:21:56 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 214364 at http://dagblog.com How might I disagree? http://dagblog.com/comment/214349#comment-214349 <a id="comment-214349"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/214348#comment-214348">Someone of our useless teehee</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>How might I disagree?</p> <p>100,000,000 dead during two world wars?</p> <p>More guns was the rule?</p> <p>No frickin way would the Jews have been better off with guns.</p> <p>No frickin way. Not with stars on their persons.</p> <p>OOOOOOOOOOh well</p> <p>People with stars on their persons are not supposed to have weapons anyway!</p> <p>There is no humor in this whatsoever NCD. </p> <p>And I get it.</p> <p>And I think WE or US manufactured most of those weapons just like today.</p> <p>And Nuremburg never even discussed the Masters of War.</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gOyWO2K9Crw" width="560px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:48:31 +0000 Richard Day comment 214349 at http://dagblog.com Someone of our useless teehee http://dagblog.com/comment/214348#comment-214348 <a id="comment-214348"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/passive-agressive-20001">PASSIVE AGRESSIVE</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Someone of our useless teevee media should tell dementia Ben the Soviet Army Navy and Air Force suffered nearly 30 million casualties in WW2, and they had tanks, rocket and conventional artillery as well as combat aircraft and ships and submarines.  That is military age mostly males, and the entire world population of Jews was less than half that number.  More guns would not have prevented the Holocaust.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:31:38 +0000 NCD comment 214348 at http://dagblog.com Well, you know Moat, some of http://dagblog.com/comment/214347#comment-214347 <a id="comment-214347"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/214345#comment-214345">If you are going to post a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, you know Moat, some of us are holy men and the others?</p> <p>Thank god that I am only ugly. hahahahahahahah</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:48:39 +0000 Richard Day comment 214347 at http://dagblog.com FAMILY TIME! http://dagblog.com/comment/214346#comment-214346 <a id="comment-214346"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/214343#comment-214343">Just in time for Halloween,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>FAMILY TIME!</p> <p>Yeah I will buy that. haHhhHhHhh</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:45:23 +0000 Richard Day comment 214346 at http://dagblog.com If you are going to post a http://dagblog.com/comment/214345#comment-214345 <a id="comment-214345"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/passive-agressive-20001">PASSIVE AGRESSIVE</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If you are going to post a blog with a picture of Søren Kierkegaard on top, you are probably going to have some jerk eventually post a quote of his regarding the tyranny of the sanctimonious:</p> <blockquote> <p>Only the person himself understands that he is guilty. The person who does not understand it this way still misunderstands; and the person who does understand it will find the harsh or gentle or quickly sympathizing explanation, according to what he has deserved. … And you, my listener, you of course know that earnestness is to be alone before the Holy One, whether it is the world’s applause that is shut out or whether it is the world’s accusation that withdraws. Did the woman who was a sinner feel her guilt more deeply when the scribes were accusing her than when there was no accuser anymore and she stood alone before the Lord! But you also realize that the most dangerously deceived person is the one who is self-deceived, that the most dangerous condition is that of the one who is deceived by much knowledge, and, furthermore, that it is a lamentable weakness to have one’s consolation in another’s light-mindedness, but it is also a lamentable weakness to have one’s terror from another’s heavy-mindedness. Leave it solely to God-after all, he knows best how to take care of everything for one who becomes alone by seeking him.</p> <p>Three Discourses On Imagined Occasions, Søren Kierkegaard, June 17, 1844, Hong 1993, p. 35-36</p> </blockquote> <p>You see, I headed the problem off before things got ugly.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:44:09 +0000 moat comment 214345 at http://dagblog.com