dagblog - Comments for "The Dark Side Of Hillary Clinton Section 1 - Lies & Political Convenience"

Bernie does not think that

rmrd0000 — Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:56:53 +0000

In reply to No. After watching the most

Bernie does not think that creating a Congressional structure to combat the corruption is worthwhile, therefore he will fail. The revolution will not be televised. Bernie cannot explain how he would realistically accomplish his goals. He is in the pocket of gun manufacturers.Sanders voted against rational drug laws and voted in favor of militarizing police.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/12/when-bernie-sanders-con...

Sanders is just another opportunistic politician.

Now you can shout out she

PeraclesPlease — Wed, 13 Apr 2016 06:42:43 +0000

In reply to No. After watching the most

Now you can shout out she killed the Kennedys (Jr).

It's taken forever, but we finally got there.

Hilarious. Please explain how

ocean-kat — Wed, 13 Apr 2016 06:34:22 +0000

In reply to No. After watching the most

Hilarious. Please explain how it's not democracy when they people clearly vote for the candidate you don't like. I mean really, I was very unhappy when Reagan was elected but that's what happens in a democracy sometimes. You could attempt to make a case that the people are too stupid for democracy. You could advocate a different system. But get a grip on reality dude. Your guy didn't get the most votes in a democratic election. If you don't accept that you're not fighting to reclaim democracy. You're trying to subvert it.

Look, vote for Hillary or don't. Just stop pretending you're doing something noble. What you're doing is losing an election, that's all.

No. After watching the most

synchronicity — Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:00:42 +0000

In reply to In basic training the

No. After watching the most corrupt collusion of the DNC, Establishment Dems, and Corporate Media (I quit watching Maddow last fall) I WILL NEVER USE MY VOTE TO GIVE THIS CORRUPT SYSTEM THE 'PRETETNSE OF OLIGARCHY!!!

Hilary Clinton is NOT qualified to be President based on her character, actions & results:

https://www.facebook.com/LaurenDBrillante/posts/1721925211430060?pnref=story

I am not just a Bernie Supporter. I am fighting To Reclaim Democracy. Right now we are trying very hard to use a broken democratic system to 'democratically' elect someone while knowing it will take extraordinary efforts and we might fail. If CORRUPTION WINS, NO, Many of US WILL Try To Find Another Way But It Most Definietly Will NOT Be Hilary & Bill back in the white house. So much corruption surrounds them it is sickening!

No. After watching the most

synchronicity — Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:00:00 +0000

In reply to In basic training the

Hilary Clinton is NOT qualified to be President based on her character, actions & results:

https://www.facebook.com/LaurenDBrillante/posts/1721925211430060?pnref=story

I am not just a Bernie Supporter. I am fighting To Reclaim Democracy. Right now we are trying very hard to use a broken democratic system to 'democratically' elect someone while knowing it will take extraordinary efforts and we might fail. If CORRUPTION WINS, NO, Many of US WILL Try To Find Another Way But It Most Definietly Will NO Be Hilary & Bill back in the white house. So much corruption surrounds them it is sickening!

In basic training the

Flavius — Fri, 08 Jan 2016 12:47:09 +0000

In reply to The Dark Side Of Hillary Clinton Section 1 - Lies & Political Convenience

In basic training the instructor would start to set up a situation: " Assume the enemy is coming through that gap in the hills; they have ten tanks ,there's a machine gun nest in that church steeple and......"

Trainee; "But sarge you couldn;t maneuver a tank through that gap"

Silence.

Instructor: "Don't fight the problem".

If Hillary's the candidate I'm going to vote for her. Or if not , for whomever else is the nominee.

Aren't we all? It doesn't take 20,494 dagbloggers to answer that question. Or even 20,493 fewer than that.

Don't fight the problem.

Dani,

Wattree — Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:10:47 +0000

In reply to Bernie has two "weak" spots

Dani,

With the clown bus of Republicans who are seeking the GOP nomination, it is clear that they have absolutely no vision for America other than to rob us blind on behalf of the Corporate/GOP Alliance, so unless America is completely out of its mind, any Democrat should be able to beat them. But I must admit, I'm completely biased against Hillary - I neither trust, nor like the woman. While I think it would be nice to have a woman in the White House, not this woman. I don't even think of her as a woman; I think of her as a sexless political machine who will do anything to win, and whose very last thought is what's in the best interest of the American people. She's an ambition-driven aristocrat - period. She's a charter member of the 1%ers, which makes her the enemy.

We must not forget that Bill walked around grinning, playing saxophone, and acting like a liberal, but he couldn't be trusted, and many of his policies cut our throats. Bill and Hillary Clinton are fiscal conservatives in drag.

Hillary is more likely to put

PeraclesPlease — Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:11:48 +0000

In reply to Bernie has two "weak" spots

Hillary is more likely to put together a $1 billion campaign chest, and nothing decides elections more than money. That's how real life works - gladhandling and persuasion and mass marketing, along with follow-the-crowd (or friends) fashion, not "logic". People buy narratives, not equations.

I have been saying this since

trkingmomoe — Sat, 31 Oct 2015 07:47:33 +0000

In reply to Putting Ted aside, I agree

I have been saying this since he made his announcement that it is a win, win, for him. He has already won because he is where the majority of the country is headed to. He defined the issues in this cycle and set the non negative tone. He shows the country how to run a campaign without big donors and that Citizens United is not needed but a corruption of the process. He is doing this outside of the media's strangle hold on picking winners. He is "what you see is what you get." He is not Madison Ave. polished up to the point that the voter is disappointed after the real person starts to govern differently then what was presented. This has been the experience since the 1990's for many voters. They haven't gotten what they thought they were voting for in either party.

He has already shook things up. He is telling people this government is theirs and it is time to make it work for them. He is proving he works for the people by not missing any work in the Senate as he runs his campaign. He is asking them to him help him do it, not just vote for him, but to be partners with him.

At this point I am not sure Clinton has this won? I am from the Jack Germond political school of thought. It is too early to call any race won. Crap happens.

Putting Ted aside, I agree

barefooted — Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:51:28 +0000

In reply to I think he has not had to

Putting Ted aside, I agree with you for the most part. Sanders has without a doubt increased his level of attention not only with the public, but the establishment. As much as he distains it, he and his supporters may need to accept that it will help him to move legislation forward. That's what you're saying -- he'll be more of a "shaker" -- after all.