dagblog - Comments for "PART 2: POLITICAL CONVENIENCE & THE DARK SIDE OF HILLARY CLINTON "

http://www.aol.com/article

Noodoggy — Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:44:37 +0000

http://www.aol.com/article/2016/01/11/bernie-sanders-has-an-11-point-lea...

This was posted 3 days ago

trkingmomoe — Sat, 07 Nov 2015 12:20:40 +0000

This was posted 3 days ago and has gone viral and your comment about Bernie's age made me think of it. Bernie has it covered. I know you have a sense of humor so enjoy and so does Sanders.

It's interesting that the

PeraclesPlease — Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:16:18 +0000

In reply to PART 2: POLITICAL CONVENIENCE & THE DARK SIDE OF HILLARY CLINTON

It's interesting that the folks who were happy about little fighting between Hillary & Bernie when Bernie's numbers were climbing are now happily pushing these hatchet jobs going back to 1992 or even to Hillary's stint as a Republican organizer at 8 years old. I'm a bit worried to see what the world would look like if Bernie's squad were actually haters - or maybe it's just that Bernie himself doesn't attack, but for the rest of his crew it's open season?

Anyway, I don't have anything bad to say about Bernie except observing that a campaign overtly labeled as based on socialism is a touch sell in America, and he's quite old for a culture that favors youth. Good luck, y'all - may the best .mensch win

(though how that's defined is still open to interpretation - as Gregory Bateson noted, survival of the fittest is a tautology - you look at who survived and then label their traits as the most fit for that environment. Doesn't work somewhere else? blame it on the environment)

Thanks, Sync, I can see you

Ramona — Fri, 06 Nov 2015 03:58:09 +0000

In reply to PART 2: POLITICAL CONVENIENCE & THE DARK SIDE OF HILLARY CLINTON

Thanks, Sync, I can see you put a lot of work into this, and I'll look more carefully at it all tomorrow, but I, too, have a hard time getting through such a long laundry list of accusations against Hillary, as if that is all there is to her. There is so much more, and, while some of what you've put up here is an uncomfortable truth, it needs to be tempered with at least some of what she's done right. Nobody on earth could be as bad as you've painted her.

You've grabbed every link and video you could find that would prove what you believe is true about her--and with all that's on the internet, that's not hard to do.

I, too, wish you had left out the clearly biased CNN panel discussion with Hugh Hewitt and Ana Navarro. (Navarro's CNN bio: Ana Navarro, a Republican strategist and commentator, was national Hispanic campaign chairwoman for John McCain in 2008, national Hispanic co-chair for Jon Huntsman's 2012 campaign and is supporting Jeb Bush's candidacy for 2016.) I watched that live and it was, as Navarro might say (often), "ridiculous".

I've seen Bill Moyers' interview with Elizabeth Warren before and there is good reason to question Hillary's vote on the bankruptcy bill. It was a good interview and Warren handled it fairly.

The screed from Robert Scheer was something else again. I wouldn't have expected anything less from him. It's who he is, but I wonder why I should care what he thinks of Hillary? He isn't exactly known for his fair assessment of anything that smacks of U.S. government, and he's a Clinton hater from way back. I'm always suspicious of those who paint the Clintons in all black with no shades of grey. It's been done and done and done.

Anyway, I know you're passionate about exposing Hillary and you've put a lot of effort into this. It's late and I'll look at it again tomorrow. I don't want what you've done here to go unnoticed, but so far I haven't changed my mind.

All of it. Really. Oxy -

HSG — Fri, 06 Nov 2015 02:27:00 +0000

In reply to Hal, which part of the blog's

All of it. Really. Oxy - you wrote that you don't like Sync's laundry list technique. Why not? Don't you think a holistic approach is best?

Those are fair answers to my

HSG — Fri, 06 Nov 2015 02:25:49 +0000

In reply to C. Bias

Those are fair answers to my question as well. I think you might want to read it again.

Firstly, to all those who

barefooted — Fri, 06 Nov 2015 02:04:57 +0000

In reply to PART 2: POLITICAL CONVENIENCE & THE DARK SIDE OF HILLARY CLINTON

Firstly, to all those who followed Synchronicity's link to this site - welcome to Dagblog! It's a great place, and I hope you'll look around.

Secondly, your dedication to Bernie is clear, Synch. I'd love to read a post from you focusing on his strengths, his very long record and why he's the best candidate for the presidency. How you believe, as someone who supports and works for him, he will make his ideas for changing this country reality. That might be worth due and sincere consideration.

David 'Uprising' Sirota again

NCD — Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:40:27 +0000

In reply to PART 2: POLITICAL CONVENIENCE & THE DARK SIDE OF HILLARY CLINTON

David 'Uprising' Sirota again?

1994?

Her State Dept. fulfilled its role in TPP meetings at the direction and for the President....ergo...?

Gun baloney? How about How the NRA Elected Bernie Sanders.

And....DRUM ROLL.... a Synchronicity favorite, linkled above from Forbes Magazine...

JACOB SULLUM

on Why Hillary Clinton Lacks Credibility On Criminal Justice Reform.

How about Why Jacob Sullum Lacks Credibility ?

Jacob Sullum

Like for his 1999 book, on public health 'tyranny' and smoking:

For Your Own Good: The Anti-Smoking Crusade and the Tyranny of Public Health

Amazon page reviews:

Sullum attempts to "demolish" the argument that second-hand smoke is dangerous. Unfortunately, he must have been too lazy to take a ten minute look at medline and the abstracts from over twenty papers that have been published over the past five years

Buyers, readers should be aware than Jacob Sullum is an editor of Reason magazine, published by the Reason foundation, which is supported by the tobacco industry.

Yes the wackjob title included "The Tyranny of Public Health".

Who is supporting this guy's anti-Hillary screeds now? Wanna guess?

C. Bias

NCD — Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:37:29 +0000

In reply to NCD - Which word do you think

C. Bias

D. Distortion

E. Delusion

Hal, which part of the blog's

Oxy Mora — Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:59:44 +0000

In reply to NCD - Which word do you think

Hal, which part of the blog's "documentation" did you find particularly compelling?