dagblog - Comments for "SPITE &amp; THE ENVIRONMENT" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/spite-environment-20163 Comments for "SPITE & THE ENVIRONMENT" en There is no technological http://dagblog.com/comment/216447#comment-216447 <a id="comment-216447"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216408#comment-216408">Your cynical answer may be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There is no technological solution to a crisis created by the use of industrial technology and the real cynics are those who sell this Big Green snake oil knowing that fact but expecting to benefit from the new industrial scale profit bonanza.</p> <p>There is no way to stop GW with our present and ever growing  gluttony of energy and materials along with almost universal rejection of the one idea that might slow GW, massive reduction of consumption of energy, mostly by the West. All the alternatives already built and what is to be built in the next few decades may only supply enough power to cover the growth in demand for new power above what we already use. Solar and wind power are certainly cleaner and greener than conventional sources of power in the long run but will require huge co2 emissions to build along with massive ecological disruption to mine and manufacture.</p> <p>If we could dramatically reduce our consumption (wishful thinking) then solar and wind could be a practical, but not environmentally cost free, replacement for coal, Nuke and gas power generation and eventually electric powered transportation, also not environmentally cost free.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:15:14 +0000 Peter comment 216447 at http://dagblog.com Thank you Mr, Smith. http://dagblog.com/comment/216412#comment-216412 <a id="comment-216412"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216411#comment-216411">More passe than one might</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thank you Mr, Smith.</p> <p>I knew there was a history to this paen.</p> <p>I recall an old Black (or in those days 'Negro') rendition.</p> <p>These are just fine.</p> <p>Again, thank you for these two renditions!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:18:13 +0000 Richard Day comment 216412 at http://dagblog.com More passe than one might http://dagblog.com/comment/216411#comment-216411 <a id="comment-216411"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216397#comment-216397">hahahahahahahahahahhaha</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>More passe than one might imagine, DD.  When I first heard it, I had no idea how old a song it was.   I thought it was written by Eric Burden and the Animals.   There are some memorable versions down through the years ... This one is the earliest I could find:<br /><br /></p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="420px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/147kS8O59Qs?rel=0" width="420px"></iframe></div> <p> </p> <p>Ronnie Gilbert of the Weavers did a woman's version of the song, which I like a lot, but this one, sung by torch singer. Libby Holman is probably my favorite.<br /><br /><br /></p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="420px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C4ZGrlO7JU4?rel=0" width="420px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:58:06 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 216411 at http://dagblog.com I used to drive to South LA, http://dagblog.com/comment/216409#comment-216409 <a id="comment-216409"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216398#comment-216398">I missed this, but not by</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">I used to drive to South LA, and the sky would turn yellow around Irvine. China fixed that not God. Okay, maybe Cheech and Chong helped.</div></div></div> Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:38:07 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 216409 at http://dagblog.com Your cynical answer may be http://dagblog.com/comment/216408#comment-216408 <a id="comment-216408"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216407#comment-216407">The story i recall was that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Your cynical answer may be satisfying and even accurate (although I disagree with your claim that solar is only viable due to ultra-cheap Chinese labor) but it lacks a proposed solution.  What course do you recommend?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:13:18 +0000 HSG comment 216408 at http://dagblog.com The story i recall was that http://dagblog.com/comment/216407#comment-216407 <a id="comment-216407"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/spite-environment-20163">SPITE &amp; THE ENVIRONMENT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The story i recall was that Ronnie or more probably Nancy  didn't like the appearance, too Hippie, of the panels on the WH roof and it had little to do with rejecting the technology.</p> <p>Carter on the other hand had them installed to impress and fool  the environmentalists while he was  really a Nuke man with a coal fixation.</p> <p>Neither of these men's policies had much if any actual effect on the development of solar power. Solar power is viable now because its components aren't made in the US but mostly in China with very cheap labor and the economy of scale and lots of coal to power the process, some of which is imported from the US.</p> <p>If you have seen the recent pictures of Beijing, where you can cut the air pollution with a knife, you see what is required to build our Clean Green future. Along with exporting our industrial jobs we have exported the pollution so we can over-consume without guilt</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:48:05 +0000 Peter comment 216407 at http://dagblog.com Richard - among the many here http://dagblog.com/comment/216406#comment-216406 <a id="comment-216406"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216383#comment-216383">HAL, you make my day!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Richard - among the many here who criticize me, your support (and Wattree's) brings to mind two distinct recollections:</p> <p>1) A few months after I first began broadcasting in 2006, I told a veteran radio host of my surprise and delight at already having listeners and callers.  He responded that no matter what market you're in and how miniscule your ratings, somebody somewhere will listen to you. </p> <p>2) Even longer ago, I was listening to Howard Stern's broadcast of a beauty contest between the guys - Howard, Jackie, Fred, and Gary "Ba Ba Booie" Dellabotte.  The judges were gay men who were instructed to select as winner the one to whom they were most attracted.  After Howard came in last, he asked one of the judges why he lost.  The judge responded that everybody is sexy to somebody.  Howard's reply: "So you're saying if I got a thousand gay guys in here, one of them would think I was good looking."</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:23:46 +0000 HSG comment 216406 at http://dagblog.com I missed this, but not by http://dagblog.com/comment/216399#comment-216399 <a id="comment-216399"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216396#comment-216396">Silly Jimmy - he didn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="line-height:1.6">down!</span></p> <p> </p> <p>  </p><p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 15 Dec 2015 06:20:17 +0000 Richard Day comment 216399 at http://dagblog.com I missed this, but not by http://dagblog.com/comment/216398#comment-216398 <a id="comment-216398"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216396#comment-216396">Silly Jimmy - he didn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I missed this, but not by much....</p> <p>hahahahahahahaha</p> <p>Jimmy never smoked much, not like me anyway; I mean 90 is not an age that many reach--without good health care anyway.</p> <p>Thank the Good Lord, China found its own smog all on its own. hahahahahah</p> <p>Some of our citizens can breath easy in LA; as long as we keep our hands up and anger down!</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/i9_e0rRvyz8" width="560px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 15 Dec 2015 06:18:48 +0000 Richard Day comment 216398 at http://dagblog.com Silly Jimmy - he didn't http://dagblog.com/comment/216396#comment-216396 <a id="comment-216396"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216391#comment-216391">Ocean does indeed have a good</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Silly Jimmy - he didn't realize that pitting 2 oil producers against each other in a blood 10-year war, along with occupying one of them afterwards, was a much more sustainable future than digging coal out of the ground and breathing it.</p> <p>What was he smoking, damn peanut farmer. Real men don't dig - they drill and shoot.</p> <p>Sending all our pollution to China was another stroke of genius - guess he was too caught up in post-Vietname syndrome to realize they could all be working for us.</p> <p>[to be fair, he &amp; Zbiggy were a bit more focused on defeating the huge $600 billion a year Soviet army, rather than pissing their pants over a few Mujaheddin. Real men put their junk in nuke silos and stare down tank turrets, not toss about roadside IUDs hoping someone will run over them]</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 15 Dec 2015 06:12:01 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 216396 at http://dagblog.com