dagblog - Comments for "Berntrayal: we wuz robbed" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/berntrayal-we-wuz-robbed-20189 Comments for "Berntrayal: we wuz robbed" en >p>Sigh. http://dagblog.com/comment/217123#comment-217123 <a id="comment-217123"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/217121#comment-217121">Which polls? Corporate polls?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sigh.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jan 2016 07:54:33 +0000 barefooted comment 217123 at http://dagblog.com He didn't just do that he http://dagblog.com/comment/217122#comment-217122 <a id="comment-217122"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216832#comment-216832">But you&#039;re wrong sync, we do</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>He didn't just do that he called for an independent investigation of all of the firewall breachers that have occurred and there were widespread reports of Bernie supporters receiving Hillary emails after the breach issue.  </p> <p>I don't consider this event something that the Sanders campaign did wrong.  I consider it sabotage by the DNC on the behalf of Hillary on a day that should have given Bernie Sanders more press and big momentum.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jan 2016 07:16:43 +0000 synchronicity comment 217122 at http://dagblog.com Which polls? Corporate polls? http://dagblog.com/comment/217121#comment-217121 <a id="comment-217121"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216834#comment-216834">All the available evidence</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Which polls? Corporate polls?  Pretty sure that's what they want you to believe &amp; to the extent that may be true I would suggest that is less and less true every day as people become more aware of the stark realities taking place.  We can't reward the corruption of the DNC Or Hillary by then giving her our votes.  AND Hillary will NOT get the independent or republican support Bernie Sanders can and WILL Get!  I consider her new 'endorsement' by planned parenthood, kind of silly because they can't speak for anyone, just another board of a company thing.  Many of her unoin endorsements have been hollow because they were decided by a few high level members and NOT the rank and file.  Hillary hasn't won ANYTHING yet.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 08 Jan 2016 07:14:55 +0000 synchronicity comment 217121 at http://dagblog.com Enough shilly-shally, let's http://dagblog.com/comment/216858#comment-216858 <a id="comment-216858"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/berntrayal-we-wuz-robbed-20189">Berntrayal: we wuz robbed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Enough shilly-shally, let's cut to the chase. You state:</p> <p><em>3) Despite Bern's apology,his team's line is that this was a setup by the DNC and the db contractor NGP VAN - designed to entice them like cheese before mice...</em></p> <p>This, frankly, is tosh. </p> <p>Science has shown that cheese is not - repeat, NOT - appealing to mice. It's a vicious goddamn slur, PP, and we, the MPAFOM - mice people and friends of mice - have had enough. </p> <p>We know where you live.</p> <p>In fact, we're already in your goddamn attic. </p> <p>Your ass - as well as your leftovers - belong to us.</p> <p>You won't feel your face.</p> <p>- the Six</p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KEI4qSrkPAs" width="560px"></iframe></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:09:05 +0000 quinn esq comment 216858 at http://dagblog.com Sour grapes, dude. You're http://dagblog.com/comment/216856#comment-216856 <a id="comment-216856"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216853#comment-216853">Your words define you as</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Sour grapes, dude. You're bitter.</div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:13:04 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 216856 at http://dagblog.com Your words define you as http://dagblog.com/comment/216853#comment-216853 <a id="comment-216853"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216848#comment-216848">Communism lost.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Your words define you as Petite Bourgeoisie what Kierkegaard described as spiritless and devoid of imagination. The use of 'I'll take' and 'golden goose' shows where petite becomes petty and the only thing you sprinkle is BS.</p> <p>Capitalism certainly rules but even though you keep your nose firmly up its butt the egg you receive for your dedication will be malodorous.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:10:13 +0000 Peter comment 216853 at http://dagblog.com Melt them down, rivulets of http://dagblog.com/comment/216850#comment-216850 <a id="comment-216850"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216848#comment-216848">Communism lost.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Melt them down, rivulets of molten gold thru America's streets - with "do not touch" signs</div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:42:47 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 216850 at http://dagblog.com Then poach them, with care http://dagblog.com/comment/216849#comment-216849 <a id="comment-216849"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216848#comment-216848">Communism lost.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Then poach them, with care given to the boil.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 07:18:51 +0000 barefooted comment 216849 at http://dagblog.com Communism lost. http://dagblog.com/comment/216848#comment-216848 <a id="comment-216848"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216840#comment-216840">Liberal Democrats and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Communism lost. I'll take Capitalism with a liberal sprinkling of Socialism on top. Gore ran against the capitalist innovation that let his administration be a success. Don't kill the golden goose - channel its eggs.</div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 06:50:54 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 216848 at http://dagblog.com Liberal Democrats and http://dagblog.com/comment/216840#comment-216840 <a id="comment-216840"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216838#comment-216838">Compromise is part of our</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Liberal Democrats and especially their leaders have monopolized compromise but only with the Right never with the Left who they affectionately refer to as 'fucking retards' which is actually an accurate description of any real Leftist who associates with  or believes the Democrats represent them.</p> <p>Ralph Nader is no Socialist just as Bernie Sanders is not, all they call for is reform and better Capitalism. Nader was only trying to push Gore a little to the left and offered his full support if Gore and the DNC would adopt some mild corporate restraint planks into their platform. This was too extreme for the corporate/DNC stooge Gore who told Nader and his supporters to piss-off.</p> <p>Sanders sheepdog campaign is an attempt to fool the retards and return them to what someone above called 'unprincipled support' of the Party, we'll have to wait and see if it works.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 30 Dec 2015 17:10:52 +0000 Peter comment 216840 at http://dagblog.com