dagblog - Comments for "How to Reduce Racial Animus 101" http://dagblog.com/how-reduce-racial-animus-101-20190 Comments for "How to Reduce Racial Animus 101" en Agree with some of the issues http://dagblog.com/comment/217707#comment-217707 <a id="comment-217707"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/how-reduce-racial-animus-101-20190">How to Reduce Racial Animus 101</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Agree with some of the issues. No one is to blamed in these issues. the only way which can eradicate all these is our way of we think about other races. The only thing which i think is <a href="http://juegosgratisdetragamonedas.com/betway.php">live</a> in harmony and let all to live with the same feel.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 23 Jan 2016 18:35:28 +0000 Anonymous comment 217707 at http://dagblog.com Among well-compensated http://dagblog.com/comment/216852#comment-216852 <a id="comment-216852"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216846#comment-216846">Ultimately, this is how we</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Among well-compensated reasonably satisfied, i.e., privileged, people there's a tremendous resistance to acknowledging the damage that wealth disparities/economic injustice does to our society and the way it poisons relations.  I explain why here. <a href="http://halginsberg.com/why-do-some-on-the-left-insist-on-practicing-divisive-interest-group-politics-rather-than-demand-economic-justice-for-all/">http://halginsberg.com/why-do-some-on-the-left-insist-on-practicing-divi...</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:28:00 +0000 HSG comment 216852 at http://dagblog.com 2) Again you moved the goal http://dagblog.com/comment/216851#comment-216851 <a id="comment-216851"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216847#comment-216847">1) Fair enough.  I shouldn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>2) Again you moved the goal posts.  I never said investment banking isn't exciting and intellectually stimulating or that it doesn't provide non-pecuniary benefits.  My point was/is that it's not just a bed of roses.  There are lots of thorns in there - including often incredibly long hours, sometimes extremely difficult supervisors, a constant temptation to engage in unethical behavior, the possibility that bad luck at any point can derail a particular deal, and the fact that the business really is even more soulless than most others - you are ultimately judged based on how much money you bring in to the firm.  Nothing else really matters. </p> <p>Regarding your rhetorical question - "what do I know about investment banking" - I think I know more than most people who haven't worked in the field.  But I don't believe this kind of discussion is productive in the least so I won't engage in it.</p> <p>3) We mostly agree here but I don't think physical labor is only less attractive because it's dangerous.  Sometimes, it's not dangerous but it's repetitive, dull, and not intellectually stimulating.  In any case, I guess you're persuaded by my point here.  If we reduced economic inequality - by ensuring that those doing physical labor are paid more and are guaranteed a secure retirement and those who engage in investment banking ultimately take home a lot less - then the parents in central New Jersey wouldn't be as desperate about challenging their kids to achieve academically.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:04:00 +0000 HSG comment 216851 at http://dagblog.com 1) Fair enough.  I shouldn't http://dagblog.com/comment/216847#comment-216847 <a id="comment-216847"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216804#comment-216804">Thanks Michael.  We obviously</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>1) Fair enough.  I shouldn't move your goal posts!</p> <p>2) What do you really know about investment banking, investment management or the types of things that finance people do?  Because advising two companies about a potential merger or advising a wealth management client about something as essential as their life and legacy is actually pretty interesting work.  It's competitive, it's hard and it can be dreary and dull, but it can also be exciting and, yes, intellectually stimulating.  I know some professional portfolio managers who are just incredibly clued in to how the world works.  They have access to influential people and to incredible amounts of data and commentary, not to mention quantitative geniuses at the ready.  Have you ever played with a Bloomberg terminal?  Hal... you can look up a specific cargo ship on that thing, read it's manifest, pinpoint its exact location and pull up a satellite image of the ship at sea.  To say that such work is not intellectually stimulating is just a lazy criticism.</p> <p>3) Physical labor is only less attractive because it is dangerous, either quickly or slowly.  It would be fine if these jobs were all like NFL careers, where you get paid big sums with the expectation that you will only be able to do that kind of work for 5-10 years.  But when physical labor pays a wage so low that you cannot save for a retirement at 65, much less the retirement you might really need at 50, it loses some of its appeal despite its inherent dignity.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 04:08:17 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 216847 at http://dagblog.com Ultimately, this is how we http://dagblog.com/comment/216846#comment-216846 <a id="comment-216846"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216845#comment-216845">As a parent of a freshman</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ultimately, this is how we all experience life.  I remember, when I was a factchecker/reporter at <em>Forbes</em> that we had a meeting where the editor told us all point blank, "all of you are not going to be promoted to writer" (the most coveted promotion for our group), "because the magazine doesn't need that many writers, even if we never hire another person."  Of course you wind up looking around the room wondering who is going to eat your lunch.  The thing is, it's true.  Of course it's true.  There are desirable things in this world that are also in limited supply.</p> <p>We can do a lot to address inequalities. But, of course, in the end, when things and positions are in limited supply, we will all have to fight for them and animus will result. Until we hit the Star Trek gold mine where scarcity is eliminated and anyone can have a Ferrari just by asking a computer to assemble one, we're locked in competition.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 03:56:33 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 216846 at http://dagblog.com As a parent of a freshman http://dagblog.com/comment/216845#comment-216845 <a id="comment-216845"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/how-reduce-racial-animus-101-20190">How to Reduce Racial Animus 101</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As a parent of a freshman student in College, looking back on the 1 to 12 experience prompts me to remember how some parents saw the process of education as a game of musical chairs where only some people would have a place to sit after the music stopped.</p> <p>For that group, no amount of shared prosperity will change the dynamics of the limited number of jobs they see as available. The point of view is more of an opinion about means of production than social justice. I don't think of this perspective as an expression of any particular self-identity (racial or otherwise) because it pops up everywhere.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2015 01:34:16 +0000 moat comment 216845 at http://dagblog.com As an actual attendee of a http://dagblog.com/comment/216842#comment-216842 <a id="comment-216842"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/how-reduce-racial-animus-101-20190">How to Reduce Racial Animus 101</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>As an actual attendee of a high school in this district, I can tell you straight up that money isn't really the issue here. In order to live here, people must pay awfully high taxes, the only reason being the school district. Nothing else in my town is noteworthy. Only about 4% of my school is eligible to receive some kind of lunch discount. The problem here is that we're being groomed merely to place checkboxes into scantrons, and many of the teachers here are apathetic to actually getting their kids interested in the subjects they teach. The real reason our super removed the midterms and finals wasn't because of the stress it gave students, but because they were arranged awkwardly and didn't do much for the final grade, so he removed them altogether instead of correcting the problem. I do agree, however, with your point about both sides being correct as well as the entire issue being a bigger deal than it really is. Our curriculum before the changes was great, but there were things wrong with it that should've been corrected instead of removed.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:26:39 +0000 Anonymous comment 216842 at http://dagblog.com We're all centrists at heart http://dagblog.com/comment/216822#comment-216822 <a id="comment-216822"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216815#comment-216815">I read the article several</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We're all centrists at heart - you're either too much or too little, while my way is the perfect compromise. In Rome, they think Africa starts to the south, and Teutonic barbarians are to the north. Milan thinks Tuscany's already Africa, and the Huns don't start till Switzerland.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:03:52 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 216822 at http://dagblog.com I read the article several http://dagblog.com/comment/216815#comment-216815 <a id="comment-216815"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/how-reduce-racial-animus-101-20190">How to Reduce Racial Animus 101</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I read the article several days ago. It is interesting viewing the disagreement between Asian and white parents with white parents thinking the Asians are pushing too hard. There is a search for a solution that soothes the white parents. Interestingly, if black parents pushed for the same lowering of standards, they would be viewed as attempting to destroy the educational system.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:57:04 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 216815 at http://dagblog.com There should have been a lot http://dagblog.com/comment/216810#comment-216810 <a id="comment-216810"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/216804#comment-216804">Thanks Michael.  We obviously</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">There should have been a lot more bankers committing suicide. The paucity of hard kiri is a scandal in itself. Yes, when you lose a billion dollars you should kill yourself, as when you get caught screwing your clients on a massive scale. But your anecdotes are over 5 years - hardly statistically significant, sadly.</div></div></div> Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:56:01 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 216810 at http://dagblog.com