dagblog - Comments for "Just Another Opinion of Opinions"

Wow, now you're sliding, PP.

Peter — Sat, 06 Feb 2016 18:35:55 +0000

In reply to Wow, Hillary's responsible

Wow, now you're sliding, PP. You need to regroup and find something to hang onto that doesn't rely on Birther diversions that have nothing to do with what HRC has done. The Sturm-und-Drang that is the Clinton's legacy is growing more and more difficult to ignore/suppress/deny but I'm sure some will continue to try.

Wow, Hillary's responsible

PeraclesPlease — Sat, 06 Feb 2016 16:23:17 +0000

In reply to You're slipping, PP there

Wow, Hillary's responsible for Citizens United just like she's responsible for the Birther movement and all the other troubles that confront us. Truly remarkable woman.

You're slipping, PP there

Peter — Sat, 06 Feb 2016 16:14:48 +0000

In reply to Sure, there is no tea party,

You're slipping, PP there would be no Citizens United if not for HRC's filing a frivolous lawsuit in a vain attempt to protect her image. This was either one of her most stupid maneuvers or a slick politician scheming to open the door for the $Billion she would need to buy the presidency.

Many of Bernie's young supporters may be naive rubes who with others believe in the system and have delusions about progressive revolution but at least they recognize that HRC is a liar and a phony and reject putting that kind of political parasite in the WH.

Peter, you never provide

rmrd0000 — Sat, 06 Feb 2016 15:59:16 +0000

In reply to Schwartz's attack is the same

Peter, you never provide links to support your arguments. This is not surprising, because there is no support for your delusional statements. Please provide justification for your statement about the Democratic elites defusing your non-existent attack on people wanting to Primary Obama. You are unable to provide facts.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/the-anti-obama-democra...

There was never a real Primary threat against Obama. You might want to use the Google to see the electoral vote count in the 2012 Presidential election.

Your statements and arguments are like Donald Trump's statements and arguments, facts don't matter. Trump rants and provide no facts. You rant and refuse to provide links to support your allegations.

Sure, there is no tea party,

PeraclesPlease — Sat, 06 Feb 2016 13:32:15 +0000

In reply to Schwartz's attack is the same

Sure, there is no tea party, Republicans don't have both houses and most state legislatures, there was no Citizens United ruling, Occupy Wall Street and Ferguson protests were an overwhelming success, and America is simply waiting for a progressive revolution. Blue sky as far as I can see.

Schwartz's attack is the same

Peter — Sat, 06 Feb 2016 02:39:54 +0000

In reply to Schwartz's piece is nonsense.

Schwartz's attack is the same game plan the Dem elite and their minions used in 2012 to distract and defuse the Primary Obama movement, it is elite, condescending and typical of the Party and their ilk.

The problem this time is that Bernie is a contender not just an idea and he has a growing base of support. To drag out this crap now just shows that there is fear deep in the Clinton camp and this stupid tactic could backfire especially if Clinton wins the nomination and her minions have driven the young Bernie supporters from the Party with their insults.

I expect the Boycott Elections movement to grow when the Clinton loyalists start dictating their finisher line, to the rubes, that they have to vote for Clinton, they have no choice.

Schwartz's piece is nonsense.

HSG — Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:17:46 +0000

In reply to On Tuesday night, Alexandra

Schwartz's piece is nonsense. Her premise is that young Sanders supporters are besotted by his perceived "purity". In fact, based on my experience speaking with many young Sanders supporters, they like Bernie because they truly believe, due to his long and consistent record and his campaigning, that he shares their concerns about education, the environment, health care, jobs, militarism, and economic security. They appreciate the fact that he doesn't take money from corporations and no corporate-backed super-Pacs support him because they recognize this means he won't be beholden to corporatists if he prevails. This stuff really isn't difficult.

Oh, he's having vapors over

PeraclesPlease — Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:49:47 +0000

In reply to What attacks on Hispanic

Oh, he's having vapors over my silly reference to a well-known Mexican epithet. But then Ted's Cuban - I could have made Castro or cigar jokes for a bit of dull humor.

Here, let me fix this for you

Ramona — Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:28:00 +0000

In reply to The young Bernie supporter

Here, let me fix this for you:

[The attack on] HRC's dishonesty is well known and documented and this ~~knowledge and distrust~~ perception is shared by many people of all political persuasions.

What attacks on Hispanic

rmrd0000 — Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:56:32 +0000

In reply to The young Bernie supporter

What attacks on Hispanic Republicans are you talking about?