dagblog - Comments for "Things That Make You Go Hmmm? Why Won't Iowa Dems Release Raw Data?"

We knew ahead of time it

PeraclesPlease — Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:13:09 +0000

We knew ahead of time it would be weird and imprecise and chaotic - it's a people-corralling system with live persuasion/pleading (or in Cruz's case misleading) - here's more detail. Oh yeah, toss in a time-saving mobile app that people don't understand. Even better. But at least we know it's all Hillary's fault.

I read this also.

Richard Day — Mon, 08 Feb 2016 23:52:20 +0000

In reply to This came out yesterday. Don

I read this also.

'They' recounted or whatever.

The coin tosses meant little.

If either won by three hundred votes, who cares?

Saintorum won in 2012, but we only learned about 'the win' a few days after the fact?

This has nothing to do with my life?

This settles the question

HSG — Mon, 08 Feb 2016 23:12:06 +0000

In reply to This came out yesterday. Don

This settles the question certainly.

This came out yesterday. Don

Ramona — Mon, 08 Feb 2016 22:58:34 +0000

In reply to Things That Make You Go Hmmm? Why Won't Iowa Dems Release Raw Data?

This came out yesterday. Don't know if that's what you're looking for.

All caucuses are bullshit.

ocean-kat — Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:19:02 +0000

In reply to Things That Make You Go Hmmm? Why Won't Iowa Dems Release Raw Data?

All caucuses are bullshit. The Iowa caucus is the most bullshit caucus of them all. The worse possibility is that Hillary's supporters out bullshitted the Sanders supporters in a bullshit contest.

The funniest thing is the Sanders supporters crying about a bullshit caucus now are many of the same people who supported Obama and laughed when she got more votes in a state and he come out with more delegates.