dagblog - Comments for "She shouts redux" http://dagblog.com/link/she-shouts-redux-20347 Comments for "She shouts redux" en When it happens to me I just http://dagblog.com/comment/218702#comment-218702 <a id="comment-218702"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/218700#comment-218700">Not your fault, it&#039;s a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When it happens to me I just click the edit button and re-add the information that didn't make it past the bug.That's always worked for me and while a small annoyance it's not a big problem.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:14:21 +0000 ocean-kat comment 218702 at http://dagblog.com Not your fault, it's a http://dagblog.com/comment/218700#comment-218700 <a id="comment-218700"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/218643#comment-218643">I think Ramona made good</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not your fault, it's a dagblog bug</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:50:23 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 218700 at http://dagblog.com Glad to hear I'm not the only http://dagblog.com/comment/218660#comment-218660 <a id="comment-218660"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/218642#comment-218642">Very gracious of you, Hal. </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Glad to hear I'm not the only one you're pissing off ;-)</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:08:13 +0000 HSG comment 218660 at http://dagblog.com I think Ramona made good http://dagblog.com/comment/218643#comment-218643 <a id="comment-218643"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/218628#comment-218628">Perhaps. I&#039;d like to think</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think Ramona made good points about the media's undue focus on irrelevancies like whether Clinton "shouts".  Bernie shouts all the time.  Is sexism at work?  Quite possibly.  On the other hand, the corporate media would prefer to avoid focusing on the differences between the "pragmatist's" and the "socialist's" policy proposals, their calls to action, and their various political acts over time.  Focusing on voice modulation, hair, clothes, as well as Sanders' age, and grumpy grandpa persona help accomplish this goal.</p> <p>I thought I included the MM link when I posted.  Not sure what happened there.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:25:23 +0000 HSG comment 218643 at http://dagblog.com Very gracious of you, Hal.  http://dagblog.com/comment/218642#comment-218642 <a id="comment-218642"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/she-shouts-redux-20347">She shouts redux</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Very gracious of you, Hal.  Thank you.  I should tell you, though, I used Boehlert's article to prove a point in a comment battle a few minutes ago and, boy, did I piss that <s>person</s> troll off!  That was fun!  And all thanks to you, since I hadn't seen it before.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:11:00 +0000 Ramona comment 218642 at http://dagblog.com Perhaps. I'd like to think http://dagblog.com/comment/218628#comment-218628 <a id="comment-218628"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/218624#comment-218624">For some reason, dag succeeds</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Perhaps. I'd like to think overtly asking for, and pointing out the missed link to, what might have been a Hal "standard" puts me on the path toward the rapprochement you mention. Maybe.</p><p>Two-way street, eh?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2016 06:15:05 +0000 barefooted comment 218628 at http://dagblog.com For some reason, dag succeeds http://dagblog.com/comment/218624#comment-218624 <a id="comment-218624"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/218618#comment-218618">I almost hate to ask, but</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>For some reason, dag succeeds in sending me info that doesn't make it to the site. I've never figured out what's going on but need to spend more time on it.</p> <p>In any case, I fixed Hal's link and text based on the email I received. It's actually quite gracious on Hal's part. Perhaps a historic intra-dag rapprochement is unfolding.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:23:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 218624 at http://dagblog.com I almost hate to ask, but http://dagblog.com/comment/218618#comment-218618 <a id="comment-218618"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/she-shouts-redux-20347">She shouts redux</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I almost hate to ask, but where's your link?</p><p>Happens all the time - Dag eats stuff somewhat arbitrarily. </p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Feb 2016 03:31:46 +0000 barefooted comment 218618 at http://dagblog.com