dagblog - Comments for "Martyrs reportedly irate. Virgins cut from 72 to 36." http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/martyrs-reportedly-irate-virgins-cut-72-36-20378 Comments for "Martyrs reportedly irate. Virgins cut from 72 to 36." en Wait, what? RAISINS??!! http://dagblog.com/comment/219055#comment-219055 <a id="comment-219055"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219045#comment-219045">Jolly, you obviously didn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wait, what? RAISINS??!!</p> <p> I’m sure you’re familiar with the hypothesis that, due to a misunderstanding of an obscure word in the Qu’ran, the virgins are really raisins:  <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/jan/12/books.guardianreview5">http://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/jan/12/books.guardianreview5</a>  [MH]</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:58:10 +0000 jollyroger comment 219055 at http://dagblog.com Definitely NOT a virgin http://dagblog.com/comment/219053#comment-219053 <a id="comment-219053"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219052#comment-219052">We&#039;ll, maybe, but it&quot;ll be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Definitely NOT a virgin</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:52:34 +0000 jollyroger comment 219053 at http://dagblog.com We'll, maybe, but it"ll be http://dagblog.com/comment/219052#comment-219052 <a id="comment-219052"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219045#comment-219045">Jolly, you obviously didn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We'll, maybe, but it"ll be Charlotte Rampling</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:51:39 +0000 jollyroger comment 219052 at http://dagblog.com Jolly, you obviously didn't http://dagblog.com/comment/219045#comment-219045 <a id="comment-219045"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/martyrs-reportedly-irate-virgins-cut-72-36-20378">Martyrs reportedly irate. Virgins cut from 72 to 36.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Jolly, you obviously didn't get the memo.  The "72 virgins" thing was a typo.  The reward for blowing yourself up along with some innocent people enjoying pizza is actually one 72 year-old virgin.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:44:26 +0000 CVille Dem comment 219045 at http://dagblog.com Well, maybe, but these http://dagblog.com/comment/219026#comment-219026 <a id="comment-219026"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219025#comment-219025">You needn&#039;t be bothered.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, maybe, but these virgins are "self-renewing" (however THAT works...), proving that " with God, all things are possible".</p> <p> </p> <p>The important thing, I guess: you never run out...</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:49:51 +0000 jollyroger comment 219026 at http://dagblog.com You needn't be bothered. http://dagblog.com/comment/219025#comment-219025 <a id="comment-219025"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219023#comment-219023">Parenthetically, is the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You needn't be bothered. Virginity knows no focus.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:37:48 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 219025 at http://dagblog.com Pie in the sky? http://dagblog.com/comment/219024#comment-219024 <a id="comment-219024"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219023#comment-219023">Parenthetically, is the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Pie in the sky?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:06:57 +0000 jollyroger comment 219024 at http://dagblog.com Parenthetically, is the http://dagblog.com/comment/219023#comment-219023 <a id="comment-219023"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/martyrs-reportedly-irate-virgins-cut-72-36-20378">Martyrs reportedly irate. Virgins cut from 72 to 36.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Parenthetically, is the promise of sexual satiety in heaven a marker of an overall "sex positive" society, or a bizarre concomitant of a pathologically repressed earthly culture?</p> <p> </p> <p>I do prefer the promised endless copulation to harps and hymns myself, of course, but the focus on virginity bothers me</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:49:38 +0000 jollyroger comment 219023 at http://dagblog.com