dagblog - Comments for "The Republicans&#039; Choice: It&#039;s Trump or the Convention" http://dagblog.com/republicans-choice-its-trump-or-convention-20396 Comments for "The Republicans' Choice: It's Trump or the Convention" en Wow, there's a scenario I http://dagblog.com/comment/219314#comment-219314 <a id="comment-219314"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219285#comment-219285">I think many Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow, there's a scenario I hadn't thought of, but I feel better already.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:31:23 +0000 jollyroger comment 219314 at http://dagblog.com Ahem - Republican, since 1928 http://dagblog.com/comment/219296#comment-219296 <a id="comment-219296"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219295#comment-219295">The stat is the &#039;28 election</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ahem - Republican, <i>since</i> 1928.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:24:45 +0000 barefooted comment 219296 at http://dagblog.com The stat is the '28 election http://dagblog.com/comment/219295#comment-219295 <a id="comment-219295"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219294#comment-219294">(Channeling Dick ... I don&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The stat is the '28 election isn't included, and FDR was in for 16 years, Truman 4, so the Nixon/Bush thing started in '52. Nuts as he was I would take Nixon over Dubya, he formed the EPA, &amp; Safe drinking Water Act, Endangered Species Act ,Occupational Safety and Health Act.</p> <p>The GOP could have saved Nixon in the Senate from impeachment, but<a href="http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,877188,00.html"> the right hated him</a>, and Watergate served to get rid of Nixon and give the people the fantasy that the Congress and press were 'doing their job' on official corruption.</p> <p>Then we had Reagan's much worse than Watergate Iran/Contra affair, and later Dubya lying us into Iraq. Both of which were later deftly swept under the political and legal rug.</p> <p>On his deathbed, it was confirmed that Watergate Deep Throat was Mark Felt, #2 in the FBI under J. Edgar Hoover.</p> <p>Felt leaked the penny ante Watergate stuff to WaPo's Woodward anonymously, and likely had it in for Nixon as Nixon appointed Patrick Grey head of the FBI instead of Felt when Hoover died.</p> <p>Felt apparently didn't care about the standard illegal operating procedures of the Hoover FBI, but became a sudden anonymouus all-American hero when he helped the right ditch Nixon.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:47:20 +0000 NCD comment 219295 at http://dagblog.com (Channeling Dick ... I don't http://dagblog.com/comment/219294#comment-219294 <a id="comment-219294"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/republicans-choice-its-trump-or-convention-20396">The Republicans&#039; Choice: It&#039;s Trump or the Convention</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>(Channeling Dick ... I don't know where else to put this.)</p><p>Rachel Maddow just made what was, to me, an astounding statement. I have to take her at her word because her staff is freakin' amazing, so here's the stat (paraphrased): No Republican has been elected to the Presidency since 1928 without either a Bush or Nixon on the ticket.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 23 Feb 2016 03:07:26 +0000 barefooted comment 219294 at http://dagblog.com I think many Republicans http://dagblog.com/comment/219285#comment-219285 <a id="comment-219285"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219279#comment-219279">Someone please tell me!: am I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think many Republicans would be scared shitless---which brings up the question of who will be the last spoiler. Maybe it will be Cruz running on a third party---I think he has the money and organization to do so.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:27:45 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 219285 at http://dagblog.com Someone please tell me!: am I http://dagblog.com/comment/219279#comment-219279 <a id="comment-219279"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219278#comment-219278">Hoo-hah!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Someone please tell me!: am I happy about this or scared shitless?</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:54:12 +0000 jollyroger comment 219279 at http://dagblog.com Hoo-hah! http://dagblog.com/comment/219278#comment-219278 <a id="comment-219278"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219273#comment-219273">Oh, yeah. Trump probably</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hoo-hah!</p> <p> </p> <p>This may merely be a restatement of your case-in-chief but I do not, then, see a scenario by which he is not nominated. </p> <p> </p> <p>Roll the credits.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:48:21 +0000 jollyroger comment 219278 at http://dagblog.com Right.  Tom Hanks is http://dagblog.com/comment/219277#comment-219277 <a id="comment-219277"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219276#comment-219276">Sure. It didn&#039;t hurt him.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Right.  Tom Hanks is milquetoast.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:39:59 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 219277 at http://dagblog.com Sure. It didn't hurt him. http://dagblog.com/comment/219276#comment-219276 <a id="comment-219276"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219255#comment-219255">And he&#039;s not modulating the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sure. It didn't hurt him. Nothing hurts Trump; his followers will back him no matter what.</p> <p>But it didn't HELP him, either. He isn't expanding to pick up new followers with much speed at all. His whole act is built around keeping the audience he's got, not going out and getting a wider one. As I've said before, it's an example of the talk radio/cable news logic, where you're looking for a small and intense audience rather than a big one that only likes you okay. (Or in other words, Trump is trying to be a Howard Stern, not a Tom Hanks.)</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:22:16 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 219276 at http://dagblog.com Oh, yeah. Trump probably http://dagblog.com/comment/219273#comment-219273 <a id="comment-219273"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/219258#comment-219258">Query: assume, arguendo, a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh, yeah. Trump probably still comes out of that convention with a nomination. If he goes in with ten or eleven thousand delegates and doesn't get the nomination, his (populist, deeply anti-institutional) partisans will lose their minds. And yes, he might unleash a third party candidacy. So they'll have to give it to him.</p> <p>I think the only way he doesn't get it is if he craters down the stretch run, so it's pretty clear that he would go into the general wounded and not viable.</p> <p>Otherwise, I think the result of a brokered convention is that Trump doesn't get to pick his own running mate, but has to take Marquito.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:58:16 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 219273 at http://dagblog.com