dagblog - Comments for "An Open Letter To Angry Trump Supporters"

;-)

HSG — Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:55:37 +0000

In reply to Then I'm sure you two were

;-)

Then I'm sure you two were

Michael Maiello — Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:53:07 +0000

In reply to Thanks Michael. As always, Mr

Then I'm sure you two were well cast together.

Thanks Michael. As always, Mr

HSG — Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:43:58 +0000

In reply to Break a leg, guys!

Thanks Michael. As always, Deacon Cardwell was outstanding.

Sending in the troops would

A Guy Called LULU — Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:42:05 +0000

In reply to So she should have sent in

Sending in the troops would not exactly be breaking new ground, it's been done many times to assure the leader of a country is the one we want. In this case it obviously wasn't Zelaya. That said, and with the obvious caveat that any counterfactual is speculation, I firmly believe that a push by our State Dept. could have/ would have resulted in Zelaya being reinstated for the remainder of his elected term. I also believe that you believe that same thing, so unless you convince me that I am wrong, that you don't think Clinton had the power and influence to do so, I will consider your question to be simple bs misdirection intended to take the light of information off of one more wrong decision by Hillary Clinton.

Hillary kept the military

rmrd0000 — Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:31:30 +0000

In reply to So she should have sent in

Hillary kept the military from rescuing people in Benghazi and she led a coup in Honduras. Hillary was more powerful than the President. She has been busy.

So she should have sent in

PeraclesPlease — Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:23:14 +0000

In reply to Clinton could not have taken

So she should have sent in troops to put Zelaya back in office or what?

I provided links that

rmrd0000 — Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:01:03 +0000

In reply to Clinton could not have taken

I provided links that indicate Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong.

Clinton could not have taken

A Guy Called LULU — Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:55:49 +0000

In reply to I have seen different

Clinton could not have taken action without Obama going along, agreed?

Are you actually trying to shift all the blame to Obama, who certainly sits where the buck should stop, and are you suggesting that Hillary took actions that cannot be used to judge her political philosophy because she was not yet at the very top of the chain of command and so she shouldn't be judged on those actions because .. well ... because she is Hillary, I guess?

Oh yeah, as long as you are bothering to respond to my comment I can't help but wonder: Can you find a [convincing] link that shows where Hillary has 'shifted position' regarding a geopolitical philosophy which guided her to aid and abet the overthrow through coup of a democratically elected leader who had the popular support of his people and which allowed a hard corps right wing brutally suppressive government to take over? Do you doubt that, if she had tried, that she could have persuaded the coup government to reinstate the deposed President and let him serve out his elected term? Do you think there was anything "good" accomplished by her handling of the situation in Honduras? Do you recommend that voters "shift" their allegiance if revealed facts indicate that they should?

I have seen different

rmrd0000 — Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:32:00 +0000

In reply to I disagreed with her original

I have seen different reporting of Clinton and Honduras. Clinton could not have taken action without Obama going along, agreed?

Link # 1

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/08/02/1408141/-Setting-the-Record-Str...

Link # 2

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/25/1438997/-It-Takes-Fortitude-and...

Was thr contact request with the up leadership t set up a meeting?

Thanks a million. I

Danny Cardwell — Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:40:36 +0000

In reply to Mr. Cardwell, well said. I am

Thanks a million. I appreciate you taking the time to engage this piece. Have a great day!