dagblog - Comments for "Souljahing On" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/souljahing-20549 Comments for "Souljahing On" en No, good Canadian fun http://dagblog.com/comment/221838#comment-221838 <a id="comment-221838"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/221829#comment-221829">Hi Ocean!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, good Canadian fun involves seals in all sorts of inappropriate poses. Nothing that would fly on a US stage, short of a freak Vegas-OceanWorld mashup. OceanKat needs a strap-on to get him through the extended Debbie Downer portion of the campaign. Going limp across the finish line isnt good enough - needs some skin in the game, some sort of major political thrust. The Democratic avatar *is* a donkey, after all, but we only seem to be hung *up* like a mule - a significant semantic difference.</p> <p>PS - for nude protesters, seems Ukraine &amp; Russia's the place to be. I don't get it - too damn cold. They'll freeze their placards off.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:16:25 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 221838 at http://dagblog.com Hi Ocean! http://dagblog.com/comment/221829#comment-221829 <a id="comment-221829"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/221826#comment-221826">So I&#039;m looking at the LATEST</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hi Ocean!</p> <p>Barenakeds was a hoax.</p> <p>I read that the band attempted to get this gig and the owner told the manager:</p> <p>We don't allow that kinda stuff.</p> <p>hahahahaha</p> <p>The manager had to go out of his way to inform the idiot that the band consisted of all guys who kept their clothes on. hahahahah</p> <p>Good Canadian fun all around.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Apr 2016 03:07:07 +0000 Richard Day comment 221829 at http://dagblog.com So I'm looking at the LATEST http://dagblog.com/comment/221826#comment-221826 <a id="comment-221826"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/221819#comment-221819">NUDE PROTESTERS?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So I'm looking at the LATEST COMMENTS section to check if anything new has come up and I see Maiello's comment "1) Extending the length of" and your comment, "NUDE PROTESTERS"  I'm thinking, finally! Some useful techniques to help with a...... ah, particular problem I'm dealing with and some freaky porn to practice them on. Dagblog is really improving. Turns out not a single bare naked lady in your vid at all. Kinda disappointing.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Apr 2016 01:42:45 +0000 ocean-kat comment 221826 at http://dagblog.com NUDE PROTESTERS? http://dagblog.com/comment/221819#comment-221819 <a id="comment-221819"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/souljahing-20549">Souljahing On</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>NUDE PROTESTERS?</p> <p>Oh, rude protesters.</p> <p>Never mind.</p> <p>hahahahahahah</p> <p>I do love barenaked ladies of course.</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/B4L3ls_6UYg" width="560px"></iframe></div> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:48:52 +0000 Richard Day comment 221819 at http://dagblog.com Wow, blackagendareport, my http://dagblog.com/comment/221806#comment-221806 <a id="comment-221806"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/221805#comment-221805">Economic injustice/wealth and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow, blackagendareport, my favorite go to site. Perhaps you can focus on a country that promotes economic equality, Cuba. </p> <p>Racism in Cuba has been discussed for decades</p> <p><a href="http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2010/07/racism_is_alive_and_well_in_cuba.html">http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2010/07/racism_is_alive_and_well...</a></p> <p>The reason that <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/272485-sanders-defends-past-praise-of-fidel-castro">Sanders</a> could praise Fidel is because talk of racism is suppressed in Cuba</p> <p>From the Root</p> <p><a href="http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2010/07/racism_is_alive_and_well_in_cuba.html">http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2010/07/racism_is_alive_and_well...</a></p> <p>From the NYT</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/24/opinion/sunday/for-blacks-in-cuba-the-revolution-hasnt-begun.html?_r=0">http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/24/opinion/sunday/for-blacks-in-cuba-the-...</a></p> <p>From Al Jezeera America</p> <p><a href="http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/8/13/amid-sweeping-changes-in-us-relations-cubas-race-problem-persists.html">http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/8/13/amid-sweeping-changes-in...</a></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:51:28 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 221806 at http://dagblog.com Economic injustice/wealth and http://dagblog.com/comment/221805#comment-221805 <a id="comment-221805"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/221800#comment-221800">Some Progressives like to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Economic injustice/wealth and income disparities aggravate racial tensions.  More equal societies tend to be less racist and oppressive and to make strides against these scourges.  It is no surprise that the Civil Rights, women's rights, and environmental movements all saw their greatest successes when American society was most equitable.</p> <p>Heightened racial tensions in Obama's America are a foreseeable consequence of an ever more economically <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/02/26/during-obamas-presidency-wealth-inequality-has-increased-and-poverty-levels-are-higher/">unjust</a> land - one in which African Americans have fallen farther behind.  <a href="http://www.blackagendareport.com/obama-legacy-black-child-poverty">http://www.blackagendareport.com/obama-legacy-black-child-poverty</a>.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:58:57 +0000 HSG comment 221805 at http://dagblog.com Some Progressives like to http://dagblog.com/comment/221800#comment-221800 <a id="comment-221800"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/souljahing-20549">Souljahing On</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Some Progressives like to cast Sanders focus on economics as the "solution" to racism. Black voters on the other hand feel the impact of racism at a variety of levels independent of income. Racism is not simply manifested as police abuse.</p> <p>Race impacts the amount of pain medication you receive after an injury</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-false-charms-of-bernie-sanderss-single-payer-plan/2016/02/07/7b79be5a-cc25-11e5-a7b2-5a2f824b02c9_story.html">https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-false-charms-of-bernie-sande...</a></p> <p>Race impacts access to employment</p> <p><a href="https://www.chicagobooth.edu/capideas/spring03/racialbias.html">https://www.chicagobooth.edu/capideas/spring03/racialbias.html</a></p> <p>Race effects access to home loans</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/31/nyregion/hudson-city-bank-settlement.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/31/nyregion/hudson-city-bank-settlement.html</a></p> <p>The reason Sanders got early pushback because he did not focus on race is because acknowledging the impact of race is a matter of life and death in the black community.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:13:14 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 221800 at http://dagblog.com You repeatedly ask, what I http://dagblog.com/comment/221796#comment-221796 <a id="comment-221796"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/221794#comment-221794">So you can&#039;t or won&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You repeatedly ask, what I think that Hillary will do that Bernie won't. I repeatedly tell you that I don't believe Bernie can get elected. Asking what Bernie will do is like asking if I want to travel to Vulcan via impulse engines or warp drive. I am not getting to Vulcan either way. Sanders can't explain is own programs. Sanders cannot explain how his single-payer health care plan will get passed.</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-false-charms-of-bernie-sanderss-single-payer-plan/2016/02/07/7b79be5a-cc25-11e5-a7b2-5a2f824b02c9_story.html">https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-false-charms-of-bernie-sande...</a></p> <p>He will wilt in the run up to the general election.</p> <p>You keep asking why I don't support a man who can't explain why single-payer failed in his own home state but will be deployed nationally.</p> <p>I expect Hillary to be able to take on Cruz or Trump. I expect a leftward shift of SCOTUS because the racist Scalia is dead. I see Hillary as the rational choice because I see Bernie going down in flames like Dukakis and McGovern.</p> <p>Asking what Bernie will propose is ridiculous because Sanders is not electable.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:51:06 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 221796 at http://dagblog.com Thanks. http://dagblog.com/comment/221797#comment-221797 <a id="comment-221797"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/221796#comment-221796">You repeatedly ask, what I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:42:28 +0000 HSG comment 221797 at http://dagblog.com So you can't or won't http://dagblog.com/comment/221794#comment-221794 <a id="comment-221794"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/221791#comment-221791">I prefer Clinton because she</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So you can't or won't identify any specific legislation or executive actions that Clinton will pass or take that Sanders won't but you support her in part because he didn't reach out to your community and he disappointed some African Americans in Vermont and because you say "she's building structure to get things done".  Okay that's fair. </p> <p>I have not repeatedly questioned why a majority of blacks support Clinton.  I am disappointed by the fact but I understand it and have set out here reasons that I think many blacks support her including most members of the Congressional Black Caucus.  I have not denigrated Hillary's black supporters the way you have denigrated Cornel West and dismissed Danny Glover and Harry Belafonte.</p> <p>I'm Jewish and there are many Jews who don't like Bernie Sanders but I'm still voting for him. I vote for the candidate who I believe will be best for poor, working, and middle-class Americans and the environment.  I have no doubts that Bernie Sanders is that candidate in this election.  I asked you to set out legislation or actions that you believe she will push for or take that will be better than what Bernie will do because that's how I decide who's best - the one who acts in ways that improves the lot of poor, working, and middle-class Americans and the environment is the one who's best. </p> <p>Perhaps you can identify specific salutary changes that will result from the structure Clinton is building.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:13:56 +0000 HSG comment 221794 at http://dagblog.com