dagblog - Comments for "Yeah, they have more money " http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/yeah-they-have-more-money-20611 Comments for "Yeah, they have more money " en Bias is the normal human http://dagblog.com/comment/222669#comment-222669 <a id="comment-222669"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222668#comment-222668">Bias is more than preference.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bias is the normal human condition.</p> <p><a href="http://nautil.us/issue/24/error/the-trouble-with-scientists">http://nautil.us/issue/24/error/the-trouble-with-scientists</a></p> <p>When I hear Bernie Sanders, I reflect on past experiences and compare interactions with other people I have encountered. Sanders falls into the category of all hat and no cattle based on my past experiences. When Sanders offers "free college" paid by higher payroll taxes, I measure the likelihood of Congress passing legislation to support the plan as extremely low. My past experiences tell me Sanders is unrealistic. I do not rate his programs chances of passing as 50-50, I rate the passage as 5-95. Bias is built into my calculation, but I rate my calculation as rational.</p> <p>You look at Sanders accomplishments in Congress and his rhetoric and rate the possibility of free education as much more likely than I . You are biased towards Sanders. You are disappointed by Obama not getting everything he wanted done as a failure. You see black poverty and see Sanders as the solution. I see the same poverty, look at the Republicans in Congress and the reactionary voting block, and see little that suggests Sanders is realistic.I see Clinton as much more realistic about the obstacles that we face. Governors are actually pulling funding from education at all levels. My bias leads me to select Hillary.</p> <p>When new information occurs in the form of a townhall question, I reassess my bias. When a woman tells Sanders that the only way to fund pre-K education is to tax soda beverages, I listen for Sanders response. Sanders says that taxing sodas harms the poor. His statement is true, but taxing cigarettes also harms the poor. Sanders tells the woman to wait until he becomes President and passes his education tax plan. I reassess my bias and find that Sanders has confirmed my bias. The likelihood of passing the educational plan is low. Sanders is unrealistic. Hillary supports the tax. I find her position more realizable.</p> <p>Regarding issues of war, I find that Sanders has never really been tested. He is in a protected Senate seat and could vote however he felt at little risk. He can be a pacifist. He has never been in a position where intelligence was coming in that individual X was at place Y and could be taken out by a drone. My bias is not to trust Bernie a Sanders to make the correct decision. If an individual is enough of a threat, I do need to feel that a President has the right killer instinct. I want the President to send in the drone, or the Military team to take out Bin Laden. I realize that Martin Luther King Jr would protest on moral grounds. I have no doubt that Hillary would send in the drone or the military team.</p> <p>My bias leads me to select Hillary.v Yours likely tells you that Sanders would show more restraint than Hillary.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2016 02:43:43 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 222669 at http://dagblog.com Bias is more than preference. http://dagblog.com/comment/222668#comment-222668 <a id="comment-222668"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222667#comment-222667">Your preference is based on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bias is more than preference.  The word's meaning includes prejudice.  In other words, an unfair or unjustified preference.  While I wholly disagree with your choice in the primaries, I'm not sure you're biased.  I don't think you prefer Clinton for some irrational or indefensible reason.  Likewise, I don't accept that I'm biased.  I think I see the candidates pretty clearly.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2016 01:38:16 +0000 HSG comment 222668 at http://dagblog.com Your preference is based on http://dagblog.com/comment/222667#comment-222667 <a id="comment-222667"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222664#comment-222664">Yes I do.  But my preference</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Your preference is based on your interpretation of the evidence. Obviously my bias is for Hillary Clinton.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2016 01:20:07 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 222667 at http://dagblog.com Hal your words http://dagblog.com/comment/222666#comment-222666 <a id="comment-222666"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222661#comment-222661">You write: &quot;Hal, you said</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hal your words</p> <blockquote> <p>the civil rights leaders of the 60s who back Clinton are neither totally different nor have they all sold out.  They are part of the establishment now and they (and their children and grandchildren) are not feeling the pain the majority of Americans who have less than $1,000 in savings do.  Their interests and experiences have diverged dramatically from those of the great majority of their constituents.  Not a tough one really.</p> </blockquote> <p>The context of the words was that by not supporting Sanders, the CBC was not doing things that benefitted the black community. Are you now stating that the CBC votes in the interest of the black community?</p> <p>If you agree that the CBC votes in the interest of the black community then their votes for Hillary are valid</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2016 00:23:36 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 222666 at http://dagblog.com What are you talking about http://dagblog.com/comment/222665#comment-222665 <a id="comment-222665"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222662#comment-222662">So you want Bill Gates the be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What are you talking about when you write "it just doesn't do it for" me?  I'm glad he's giving me to help sick people.  Ultimately, I would prefer that he spend money to empower the powerless and enrich the poor.  Do you have a problem with that?  Why?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2016 00:12:38 +0000 HSG comment 222665 at http://dagblog.com Yes I do.  But my preference http://dagblog.com/comment/222664#comment-222664 <a id="comment-222664"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222663#comment-222663">Bias, prejudice mean a strong</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes I do.  But my preference is based on the evidence.  Are you biased in favor of Clinton?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 May 2016 00:11:04 +0000 HSG comment 222664 at http://dagblog.com Bias, prejudice mean a strong http://dagblog.com/comment/222663#comment-222663 <a id="comment-222663"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222659#comment-222659">Bias?  Evidence for that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bias, prejudice mean a strong inclination of the mind or a preconceived opinion about something or someone. A bias may be favorable or unfavorable: bias in favor of or against an idea.</p> <p> </p> <p>You favor Sanders</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 03 May 2016 23:17:26 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 222663 at http://dagblog.com So you want Bill Gates the be http://dagblog.com/comment/222662#comment-222662 <a id="comment-222662"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222652#comment-222652">I noted that LBJ grew up poor</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So you want Bill Gates the be a left-wing Koch?  And the fact that he has chosen to support medical issues that affect millions of people who have, pretty much no advocates, just doesn't do it for you.  Maybe you should make a list. You could call it:</p> <p><strong>What Everyone Should Do. By Hal Ginsberg</strong></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 03 May 2016 22:29:21 +0000 CVille Dem comment 222662 at http://dagblog.com You write: "Hal, you said http://dagblog.com/comment/222661#comment-222661 <a id="comment-222661"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222657#comment-222657">Hal, you said that they were</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You write: "Hal, you said that they were not voting the interests of their constituents."</p> <p>I never wrote that CBC members are not voting the interests of their constituents.</p> <p>Now can you tell me whether you have a purity test given your attacks on blacks who support Bernie Sanders.  If not, please identify black supporters of Bernie Sanders whose politics you respect.  I have identified black supporters of Hillary Clinton whose politics I respect.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 03 May 2016 22:24:28 +0000 HSG comment 222661 at http://dagblog.com You include Vietnam in your http://dagblog.com/comment/222660#comment-222660 <a id="comment-222660"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222658#comment-222658">Despite the parade of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You include Vietnam in your list?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 03 May 2016 22:21:30 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 222660 at http://dagblog.com