dagblog - Comments for "Hillary wins with $0 spent"

See the comment above this

rmrd0000 — Fri, 06 May 2016 13:04:18 +0000

In reply to You write: "Your bias led you

See the comment above this post.

There was no criminal intent

rmrd0000 — Fri, 06 May 2016 13:03:36 +0000

In reply to 1) Does the fact that you

There was no criminal intent Hal.

BTW

Do you think your repeated cries for bashing Clinton are a little over the top? I have already stated my bias.

You write: "Your bias led you

HSG — Fri, 06 May 2016 13:00:54 +0000

In reply to I merely pointed out that the

You write: "Your bias led you to believe the hack story."

I wrote: "It appears that Clinton's email server may well have been hacked."

Now respond to my questions please.

1) Does the fact that you misrepresented the CNN article's conclusion about the investigation into Clintons' email server practice show Clinton can do no wrong in your eyes?

2) If Clinton was relying on a private server because of fears the State Department's email was not secure, why didn't she take steps to make it more secure?

1) Does the fact that you

HSG — Fri, 06 May 2016 12:54:09 +0000

In reply to I merely pointed out that the

1) Does the fact that you misrepresented the CNN article's conclusion about the investigation into Clintons' email server practice show Clinton can do no wrong in your eyes?

2) If Clinton was relying on a private server because of fears the State Department's email was not secure, why didn't she take steps to make it more secure?

The reason Kasich clobbers

HSG — Fri, 06 May 2016 12:52:12 +0000

In reply to The choice is Superdelegates

The reason Kasich clobbers Clinton but loses to Trump who loses to Clinton is the different cohorts sampled. All registered voters are asked whether they prefer Kasich or Clinton. The Buckeye gets all the Republicans most of the independents and a fair number of Democrats since Clinton will be the most strongly disliked Democrat ever to run in a general election. Clinton beats Trump because he is even more strongly disliked than she throughout the country. Trump bested Kasich because only Republicans and a few right-leaning independents voted in the Republican primaries and the #nevertrump vote was always divided among a number of Republican candidates. Among Republican primary voters, Kasich is considered okay by many but Trump is very strongly liked by a plurality. Do you understand PP?

I merely pointed out that the

rmrd0000 — Fri, 06 May 2016 12:44:37 +0000

In reply to RMRD - I have asked you

I merely pointed out that the State Department server got hacked.

When the hacker got into other servers, he released data. He has not released data from Hillary's server. Government officials as of this date find no evidence of a hack. Your bias led you to believe the hack story. There was no criminal intent. I don't care about Hillary's damn emails.

Oh, sure, I've seen that

PeraclesPlease — Fri, 06 May 2016 12:38:57 +0000

In reply to The reason Kasich clobbers

Oh, sure, I've seen that movie...

- Shall we say pistols at dawn?

- We can say it. What does it mean?

- You have insulted the Countess' honour.

- Why? I let her finish first.

- Her seconds will call on you.

- Seconds? I never gave her seconds.

- My seconds will call on your seconds.

- My seconds will be out. Have 'em call on my thirds. If my thirds are out, go to my fourths.

- He's serious! You must meet him on the field of honour.

- I'm not gonna duel with him. He's a marksman and a killer.

- Your honour is at stake!

- Hey, what is this? Slap Boris Day?

- You are a war hero. Surely a duel with Anton Lebedokov is nothing to fear?

-Look, I just don't wanna waste a good bullet. The kid's rash. I'll drop by later, give him a chance to apologise. If he doesn't, I'll move to Finland.

Speaking of quotes,

Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin'
swords is no basis for a system of government! Supreme executive power
derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic
ceremony!

RMRD - I have asked you

HSG — Fri, 06 May 2016 12:30:10 +0000

In reply to Did her server get hacked?

RMRD - I have asked you several times whether Clinton can do no wrong in your eyes. You have studiously refused to answer this question as you have refused to answer other questions I've posed even though I always ask the questions you pose to me. Regarding your latest question about whether Clinton's email server was hacked, I will answer it in hopes that you will show the same respect to me and answer my latest questions.

It appears that Clinton's email server may well have been hacked. Repeated attempts were made. It is unknown whether any or how many were successful. We know attempts came from China, Russia, South Korea, Romania. At least one Romanian claims he successfully hacked into Clinton's email account.

Okay. I answered your question. Now answer the two I posed first.

1) Does the fact that you misrepresented the CNN article's conclusion about the investigation into Clintons' email server practice show Clinton can do no wrong in your eyes?

2) If Clinton was relying on a private server because of fears the State Department's email was not secure, why didn't she take steps to make it more secure?

Did her server get hacked?

rmrd0000 — Fri, 06 May 2016 12:02:43 +0000

In reply to Doesn't the misleading

Did her server get hacked?

Doesn't the misleading

HSG — Fri, 06 May 2016 11:55:01 +0000

In reply to No, I think that she thought

Doesn't the misleading incomplete quote you provided demonstrate Clinton can do no wrong in your eyes? If Clinton's concern was the security of government servers, why didn't she take steps to make them more secure? She was Secretary of State for crying out loud.