dagblog - Comments for "After we deposed Gaddafi, Libyan rebels murdered blacks" http://dagblog.com/link/after-we-deposed-gaddafi-libyan-rebels-murdered-blacks-20642 Comments for "After we deposed Gaddafi, Libyan rebels murdered blacks" en You're saying she doesn't http://dagblog.com/comment/222992#comment-222992 <a id="comment-222992"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222981#comment-222981">Hal I provided you with links</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You're saying she doesn't deserve any blame for what happened when she was Secretary of State right?  Your argument is that whatever went wrong is really Obama's fault right?  Well then you can't credit her when things went well, if anything did, right?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 May 2016 02:01:16 +0000 HSG comment 222992 at http://dagblog.com Are you asking me?  I have no http://dagblog.com/comment/222993#comment-222993 <a id="comment-222993"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222982#comment-222982">Could you point out what yo</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Are you asking me?  I have no idea what you are talking about.  Nothing on this page was altered at 8:08.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 May 2016 02:00:38 +0000 HSG comment 222993 at http://dagblog.com Could you point out what yo http://dagblog.com/comment/222982#comment-222982 <a id="comment-222982"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222931#comment-222931">RMRD - Clinton/Obama</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Could you point out what you altered at 8:08?</p> <p>I responded to your original post this morning. You appear to have altered the post</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 May 2016 01:21:27 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 222982 at http://dagblog.com Hal I provided you with links http://dagblog.com/comment/222981#comment-222981 <a id="comment-222981"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222979#comment-222979">rmrd - your link claiming</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hal I provided you with links. I don't care if you accept them.</p> <p>Gaddaffi set up Africans as scapegoats.</p> <p>Are you asking that if Hillary did nothing wrong, she could not have done anything right?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 May 2016 01:17:40 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 222981 at http://dagblog.com PP - you insist on "in for a http://dagblog.com/comment/222980#comment-222980 <a id="comment-222980"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222926#comment-222926">Hal, real people in the real</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>PP - you insist on "in for a dime in for a dollar".  In other words, in order to stop Gaddafi from the feared slaughter in Benghazi, we had to bomb him into submission.  Obviously, as I have pointed out on several times, there was a third option.  Stop the advance into Benghazi, drive whatever troops were already there out, but leave him in power in the rest of the country.  You ignore this point, although I've made it several times.  I'm guessing it's because to acknowledge it would require you to admit your candidate made an indefensible miscalculation or worse.  AmIrite?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 May 2016 01:14:58 +0000 HSG comment 222980 at http://dagblog.com rmrd - your link claiming http://dagblog.com/comment/222979#comment-222979 <a id="comment-222979"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222953#comment-222953">Regarding Gaddaffi&#039;s racism,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>rmrd - your link claiming Gaddafi was racist provides no evidence for the claim nor does it identify racist actions by Gaddafi.  Does Hillary Clinton deserve any blame for actions she and her subordinates took while she was Secretary of State?  If the answer is no, then she doesn't deserve any credit for her time there either right?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 May 2016 01:10:19 +0000 HSG comment 222979 at http://dagblog.com RMRD - Clinton/Obama http://dagblog.com/comment/222931#comment-222931 <a id="comment-222931"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222928#comment-222928">I give responses that are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>RMRD - Clinton/Obama empowered the racists by deposing Gaddafi.  There was a good option - stop the tyrant's troops outside of Benghazi but don't kill him. Why do you believe criticism of Obama is totally out-of-bounds.  Is he some third rail?  Are leaders ever responsible when their decisions/policies lead to bad outcomes or harm people?  Can you identify any such decisions/policies of Obama or Clinton that lead to bad outcomes?  If not, would you say your view is fanatical?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 10 May 2016 01:08:42 +0000 HSG comment 222931 at http://dagblog.com    Part of the point, as Hal http://dagblog.com/comment/222976#comment-222976 <a id="comment-222976"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222968#comment-222968">That&#039;s unresponsive to my</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>   Part of the point, as Hal said, is that there was no reason to believe that tens of thousands of civilians were going to be massacred. That was boilerplate to justify an intervention that was really undertaken for geopolitical reasons, not humanitarian ones.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 09 May 2016 23:51:07 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 222976 at http://dagblog.com That's unresponsive to my http://dagblog.com/comment/222968#comment-222968 <a id="comment-222968"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222967#comment-222967"> If Hillary had said the U.S.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's unresponsive to my comment. To truly address it you would have to say:</p> <p> If Hillary had said the U.S. should not get involved<em> and Quadaffi massacred tens of thousands of civilians</em> I would not have blamed her; I would have applauded her.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 09 May 2016 22:27:50 +0000 ocean-kat comment 222968 at http://dagblog.com  If Hillary had said the U.S. http://dagblog.com/comment/222967#comment-222967 <a id="comment-222967"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/222899#comment-222899">If Hillary had advocated that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> If Hillary had said the U.S. should not get involved I would not have blamed her; I would have applauded her.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 09 May 2016 22:12:22 +0000 Aaron Carine comment 222967 at http://dagblog.com