dagblog - Comments for "Clinton to Trump: I&#039;ll Take the High Road, You Take the Low Road" http://dagblog.com/clinton-trump-you-take-low-road-and-ill-take-high-road-20662 Comments for "Clinton to Trump: I'll Take the High Road, You Take the Low Road" en I've always been partial to http://dagblog.com/comment/223089#comment-223089 <a id="comment-223089"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223079#comment-223079">Okay, I&#039;m not proud. I&#039;ll be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I've always been partial to ferrets. Not indifferent, not pandering, curious and kinda smelly.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 May 2016 03:54:43 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 223089 at http://dagblog.com Hillary's been losing so bad http://dagblog.com/comment/223088#comment-223088 <a id="comment-223088"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223081#comment-223081">You and Nate don&#039;t seem to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hillary's been losing so bad so long she must be down some umpty gillion percent by now. She's down in the center of the earth somewhere - help dig her out! She's losing 24x7 - give someone else a chance, for God's sakes! Like any conniving speculator, she's got a monopoly on losing. Don't you just hate her?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 May 2016 03:52:14 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 223088 at http://dagblog.com I suspect that one's analysis http://dagblog.com/comment/223082#comment-223082 <a id="comment-223082"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223081#comment-223081">You and Nate don&#039;t seem to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I suspect that one's analysis of who "won" Trump and Warren's twitter debate has more to do with who one supports and what one would like to see happen.</p> <p>Polling data is useless without thoughtful analysis. I suggest you start<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/polling-clinton-sanders-trump-223094"> here</a>.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 May 2016 01:43:33 +0000 ocean-kat comment 223082 at http://dagblog.com You and Nate don't seem to http://dagblog.com/comment/223081#comment-223081 <a id="comment-223081"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223070#comment-223070">You have an agenda and will</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You and Nate don't seem to understand what these polls signify at this critical point at the beginning of the actual contest between the chosen candidates or it is just another attempt at  deflection from bad news for the Clintonites. I certainly didn't think that the race would be a dead heat at this point but HRC's negatives are already dragging her down and she will certainly need many many surrogates to cover for her because she will have to hide from a direct  attack on her many soft spots that Trump will target repeatedly. I doubt Warren is up to that task and Trump's 'goofy' description of her will probably stick  and her lame tweet-storms will continue.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 May 2016 01:30:56 +0000 Peter comment 223081 at http://dagblog.com Okay, I'm not proud. I'll be http://dagblog.com/comment/223079#comment-223079 <a id="comment-223079"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223078#comment-223078">Um, I don&#039;t Tweet.  I don&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Okay, I'm not proud. I'll be in charge of the Tweets.  You can take care of the more grown-up stuff.  But I have to tell you, your cat analogy left me cold.  Much like cats do.  I don't get them at all.  They're always judging, never contributing.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 May 2016 01:03:48 +0000 Ramona comment 223079 at http://dagblog.com Um, I don't Tweet.  I don't http://dagblog.com/comment/223078#comment-223078 <a id="comment-223078"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223077#comment-223077">Start tweetin&#039; already</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Um, I don't Tweet.  I don't belong to Twitter,  Twitter seems kind of like when you adopt a cat and it runs away because it is not happy.  But more than that it is because the poor kitty has not clue about how clueless the whole Twitter thing is...she just wants to bat it here and there and snuggle into my lap.</p> <p>The other thing I can't get over is "TWEETS,". "RETWEETS," etcYeah, etc, etc.  It is embarassing </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 May 2016 00:47:05 +0000 CVille Dem comment 223078 at http://dagblog.com Start tweetin' already http://dagblog.com/comment/223077#comment-223077 <a id="comment-223077"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223075#comment-223075">Totally in!!!!!  I ain&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Start tweetin', soldier!</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 12 May 2016 00:14:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 223077 at http://dagblog.com Totally in!!!!!  I ain't http://dagblog.com/comment/223075#comment-223075 <a id="comment-223075"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223071#comment-223071">Thanks, CVille.  Did you see</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Totally in!!!!!  I ain't afraid!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 11 May 2016 22:35:55 +0000 CVille Dem comment 223075 at http://dagblog.com Looks like Elizabeth Warren http://dagblog.com/comment/223072#comment-223072 <a id="comment-223072"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223071#comment-223071">Thanks, CVille.  Did you see</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Looks like Elizabeth Warren is in.</p> <p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/elizabeth-warren-trump_us_57337658e4b012a8b933fef8">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/elizabeth-warren-trump_us_57337658e4...</a></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 11 May 2016 20:48:19 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 223072 at http://dagblog.com Thanks, CVille.  Did you see http://dagblog.com/comment/223071#comment-223071 <a id="comment-223071"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223063#comment-223063">Great job, Ramona!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks, CVille.  Did you see Michael's Rolling Stone piece?  Looks like Hillary is going to need a few nasty surrogates so she can stay above the fray.  I'm game, how about you?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 11 May 2016 20:27:16 +0000 Ramona comment 223071 at http://dagblog.com