dagblog - Comments for "Tit for Trump"

Thanks, Oxy. What a bizarre

Michael Wolraich — Mon, 16 May 2016 14:37:52 +0000

In reply to Michael, note the article by

Thanks, Oxy. What a bizarre article. Here is his kicker:

This is a fitting description of the Republican party in 2016: the unprincipled Trump standing at the head of a corrupt political force, flanked on one side by K Street lobbyists who use government to line their pockets and on the other by professional politicians regurgitating Reaganesque talking points but lacking true beliefs. Having betrayed the principles that have animated it for so long, this party cannot secure responsible government anymore.

You have to wonder what planet he lives on. When you eliminate "professional politicians" and Donald Trump's insurgency, who else is left in the Republican Party?

Morever TR's bolt didn't save the party. It crushed it.

Michael, note the article by

Oxy Mora — Sat, 14 May 2016 14:07:57 +0000

In reply to Tit for Trump

Michael, note the article by Jay Cost in the Weekly Standard on the Bull Moose Party.

Insulting Trump or calling

PeraclesPlease — Fri, 13 May 2016 15:45:05 +0000

In reply to Tit for Trump

Insulting Trump or calling him a bully is like pouring gas on a BBQ. It's like trying to insult Ted Nugent.

Good point on the unintended

Oxy Mora — Fri, 13 May 2016 11:57:30 +0000

In reply to I'm not sure she's too

Good point on the unintended vetting. Interesting article.

I'm not sure she's too

PeraclesPlease — Fri, 13 May 2016 05:28:57 +0000

In reply to Thanks, Oxy. I agree that

I'm not sure she's too independent, but the outsider role says things that aren't quite acceptable for an insider role, except Donald's changing all that. But Warren's star is "rising", and I personally find her much more credible than Bernie, but I think Bernie's given cover for Warren being more acceptable than 10 months ago, oddly vetting her rather than himself

Peter, should we leave the

PeraclesPlease — Fri, 13 May 2016 05:14:33 +0000

In reply to I can't wait to see these

Peter, should we leave the Mideast and let bloodbaths play out in Syria and Iraq and let a new caliphate be born (hundreds of thousands already dead)? When peaceful protesters rally and their governments kill them, what should we do? Is all military action of ours bad, and what do we do instead?

Now Playboy; well I only

Richard Day — Thu, 12 May 2016 22:59:00 +0000

In reply to Tit for Trump

Now Playboy; well I only looked for the tits.

But enough of tat?

WHAT?.....

But I always looked at Rolling Stone for the Tats?

WHAT?

Have you ever felt like you were in a parallel universe?

Rolling Stone.

Are you frickin kidding me?

All Righty Then.

As it were.

You really are on your own

Oh, that. . . Right.

Ramona — Thu, 12 May 2016 20:37:25 +0000

In reply to We are bonding together to

Oh, that. . .

Right.

Ah, but with Donald back in

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 12 May 2016 20:03:45 +0000

In reply to But where's Lashley now? Out

Ah, but with Donald back in the ring, we'll have America's enemies smashed up against the turnbuckle and in a Bulgarian stranglehold.

We are bonding together to

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 12 May 2016 20:01:28 +0000

In reply to What? What did I do now?

We are bonding together to help you through your difficult time because we're a considerate compassionate bunch. Didn't you get the memo? "Almost Christlike in concern for fellow (Democratic) human beings" - that's us.