dagblog - Comments for "Bill Weld Goes Rogue" http://dagblog.com/bill-weld-goes-rogue-20698 Comments for "Bill Weld Goes Rogue" en Ah, I got you. Yes, after he http://dagblog.com/comment/223455#comment-223455 <a id="comment-223455"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223421#comment-223421">Well, yes, but that&#039;s an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ah, I got you. Yes, after he lost the Republican primary, he dropped out of the race rather than run solely on a Libertarian ticket.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 May 2016 17:57:28 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 223455 at http://dagblog.com I know it couldn't have been http://dagblog.com/comment/223449#comment-223449 <a id="comment-223449"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/bill-weld-goes-rogue-20698">Bill Weld Goes Rogue</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I know it couldn't have been significant for the Koch businesses, but one of the things about Johnson's time as NM governor is that he had a lot of roads paved to counties who voted for him and Koch controlled companies did well in that business.  Hard to say he bought favor from the Koch brothers, because NM didn't have the money to really do so, at the level those guys roll, but perhaps friendships were made back then?</p> <p>At the same time, Johnson was not a bad guy.  I remember him being for pot legalization, in an honest way, before it was popular.  Cheerleaders at my local high school even refused to perform for him over it, arguing that his stance on marijuana undermined what they had been taught about drugs ruining the community.</p> <p>If all this Trump stuff means that old school Republicans switch to a true Libertarian ideology that is really about maximizing social freedoms first, rather than tax cuts for the rich first, I think we're all better for it.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 May 2016 02:15:47 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 223449 at http://dagblog.com I think you're right it was http://dagblog.com/comment/223441#comment-223441 <a id="comment-223441"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223422#comment-223422">That&#039;s a funny story, which I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think you're right it was Bulger.</p> <p>I had a friend who served in the "General Court" with whom I  could usually check but he ,sadly, just died.  BTW although he fairly conservative and fairly gay- phobic he approved of Barney Frank's legislative skills. And , I think, just plain liked him.</p> <p>My impression is that Bernie might not be as able to reject the consensus and  still be effective. It's not easy.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 22 May 2016 16:48:02 +0000 Flavius comment 223441 at http://dagblog.com I think that's definitely the http://dagblog.com/comment/223423#comment-223423 <a id="comment-223423"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223401#comment-223401">&quot;..an agent of electoral</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think that's definitely the plan. And it sounds reasonable.</p> <p>But on the other hand, I've had enough of too-clever tactical plans by Republicans who hate Trump. Their track record with the clever footwork has been abominable. At a certain point, they're just struggling against the fact that they need to choose between Trump and Clinton. Just vote for Hillary already. Don't goof around with procedural tricks.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 22 May 2016 03:34:55 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 223423 at http://dagblog.com That's a funny story, which I http://dagblog.com/comment/223422#comment-223422 <a id="comment-223422"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223398#comment-223398">Then-governor Weld was</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's a funny story, which I usually hear attached to Billy Bulger (of the infamous Bulger brothers). Bulger was President of the Massachusetts Senate while Weld was governor, and his St. Patrick's Day breakfasts were legendary. That line of Weld's shows how good he can be when he's on his game.</p> <p>And yeah. A lot of went on in the 1980s and 1990s was Watergate payback of various kinds, including the Bork thing and the treatment of the Clintons.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 22 May 2016 03:24:56 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 223422 at http://dagblog.com Well, yes, but that's an http://dagblog.com/comment/223421#comment-223421 <a id="comment-223421"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/223415#comment-223415">Fyi, this isn&#039;t Weld&#039;s first</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, yes, but that's an artifact of New York politics, where you can run on more than one party line simultaneously. Weld wasn't interested in the Libertarian nomination except in combination wth the Republican nomination, because he actually wanted to be elected governor. This is different.</p> <p>It's true that Weld's political star has been in decline for almost two decades; he never quite recovered from his (nearly-successful) attempt to take John Kerry's Senate seat from him. He doesn't have any clear path to high office any more. But this deliberately quixotic run is new for him.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 22 May 2016 03:21:12 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 223421 at http://dagblog.com Fyi, this isn't Weld's first http://dagblog.com/comment/223415#comment-223415 <a id="comment-223415"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/bill-weld-goes-rogue-20698">Bill Weld Goes Rogue</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Fyi, this isn't Weld's first date with the Libertarians. In 2006, the Libertarian Party of NY <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20060518172752/http://www.eisinc.com/release/storiesh/LIBERT.052.html">nominated him for governor</a>, but Weld dropped out of the race after he lost the Republican primary. You're absolutely right that he's a political orphan, but he's been one for some time.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 21 May 2016 22:06:40 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 223415 at http://dagblog.com "..an agent of electoral http://dagblog.com/comment/223401#comment-223401 <a id="comment-223401"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/bill-weld-goes-rogue-20698">Bill Weld Goes Rogue</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"..an agent of electoral anarchy", ---nails it exactly.</p> <p>Of course my first response is to come up with reasons why this helps Clinton more than Trump. But in the context of this election, anything is possible.t may attract the patrician Republican vote---there must be a few of those in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida---who are embarrassed by Trump but wouldn't vote for Clinton.</p> <p>If the media gets behind this new upstart and Trump considers the ticket a threat, he will try to impugn the Libertarians---which would be very counterproductive. So, on balance, I think it helps Clinton.</p> <p>The western states and New England could produce interesting fallout.  </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 21 May 2016 15:09:19 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 223401 at http://dagblog.com Then-governor Weld was http://dagblog.com/comment/223398#comment-223398 <a id="comment-223398"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/bill-weld-goes-rogue-20698">Bill Weld Goes Rogue</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Then-governor Weld was invited  by Mass Senate majority leader John Powers to attend the St.Patrick's Day dinner  in South Boston where Powers introduced him by saying with pretend humility  "We're honored to be addressed  today at our little celebration by someone whose ancestors really did come over on the Mayflower ".</p> <p>Weld : " Oh no,they sent the cook and the housekeeper ahead to open up the cottage".</p> <p>As you say ,he and Hillary were working (on a joint assignment) for Archibald Cox when Nixon fired him.</p> <p>Just a piece of misc data :at the time Western Union had a response line you could call to send one line   messages to the White House. It was essentially closed down by the " firestorm" in response.</p> <p>The head of WU asked the guy in charge  "What are they saying?".</p> <p>"You're a bum".</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 21 May 2016 13:01:16 +0000 Flavius comment 223398 at http://dagblog.com