dagblog - Comments for "This is NO ORDINARY PRIMARY = No Uniting Behind FRAUD." http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/no-ordinary-primary-no-uniting-behind-fraud-20810 Comments for "This is NO ORDINARY PRIMARY = No Uniting Behind FRAUD." en Okay. This morning is the http://dagblog.com/comment/225024#comment-225024 <a id="comment-225024"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/no-ordinary-primary-no-uniting-behind-fraud-20810">This is NO ORDINARY PRIMARY = No Uniting Behind FRAUD.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Okay. This morning is the first moment I have had to get REALLY, TRULY ENRAGED About Hilary Clinton being the first woman aimed at the white house(like a nuke that needs to be stopped) because instead of being able to be excited about it, I Have To Fight Her Tooth And Nail Because She IS A Criminal, Grifter, Psychopath!</p> <p>&amp;%!!*#&amp;^!@&amp;##@ Hilary!</p> <p>"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." -</p> <p>It is clear to me that what it takes for a small group of powerful, insane people to defeat hundreds of millions is to deceive them and keep them divided, distracted, and just comfortable enough that they won't join together and unify with enough force/power to stop them.</p> <p>PLEASE! STOP FOCUSING ON THE 'SHINY' TRUMP BEING DANGLED IN FRONT OF YOU AND NOTICE THE 'REAL" THREATS TO OUR EXISTENCE!</p> <p>Trump as distraction must be the reason corporate media owners gave the BILLIONAIRE 24/7 WALL TO WALL NON STOP COVERAGE AND "WATCHED AS HE WON THE NOMINATION"</p> <p>It was intended... not an accident... just as much as HIllary has been INSTALLED and NOT ELECTED! </p> <p> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/sandersclan?source=feed_text&amp;story_id=1756113964677851">‪#‎SandersCLAN‬</a><a href="https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/neverhillary?source=feed_text&amp;story_id=1756113964677851">‪#‎NeverHillary‬</a> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/nevertrump?source=feed_text&amp;story_id=1756113964677851">‪#‎NeverTrump‬</a> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/neverquit?source=feed_text&amp;story_id=1756113964677851">‪#‎NeverQuit‬</a> </p> <p>"Never Lose Your Sense Of Outrage' -Bernie Sanders   </p> <p>OH I AM PISSED OFF LIKE YOU WOULD NOT BELIEVE AT WHAT IS BEING DONE TO THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY!!!  </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/1K_6dbLHESg" width="560px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:14:43 +0000 synchronicity comment 225024 at http://dagblog.com (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/224772#comment-224772 <a id="comment-224772"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/no-ordinary-primary-no-uniting-behind-fraud-20810">This is NO ORDINARY PRIMARY = No Uniting Behind FRAUD.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The corporate media has been driving propaganda, not truth about Bernie Sanders during this primary as soon as it became apparent that he was gaining support last summer.  And to be honest most of us don't trust Hilary to follow through with anything she might 'say' she will do... so 'unity' is unlikely for about 70% of Bernie supporters... We are looking at How We Can End UP with a president that will fight for The People next year from where we are now i.e. not HIllary OR Trump... considering how bad both of these candidates are, We HAVE TO TRY.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/03AgpiRYj7Q" width="560px"></iframe></div> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 26 Jun 2016 01:22:22 +0000 synchronicity comment 224772 at http://dagblog.com How stupid is it to have http://dagblog.com/comment/224755#comment-224755 <a id="comment-224755"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/224753#comment-224753">Argh! Th 61 million who voted</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>How stupid is it to have Republicans or rightest independents voting in a Democratic primary or vice versa? It's pretty easy to say that party elections are good for democracy and they should be funded by state money if serious enough. And of course there are other issues on the ballot besides candidate. How strange for a socialist to want the state to pay for everything except elections.  What is the goal here? Oh, Bernie had trouble getting votes so we'll change our system to make it easier for him? Maybe he needs a pillow.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jun 2016 17:15:42 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 224755 at http://dagblog.com Argh! Th 61 million who voted http://dagblog.com/comment/224753#comment-224753 <a id="comment-224753"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/224751#comment-224751">Obama beat Romney (popular</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Argh! Th 61 million who voted for Romney could hardly be said to have lost any representation in our government and so Obama certainly did not need to hand off any additional power to them. Even as much as I disagree with the Republicans I would not try to convince anybody that by losing that election those 61 million had legitimately lost the <u>right</u> to <u>any</u> representation at all. Sanders and/or his ideas have gained a lot of traction <u>within</u> the Democratic Party. They have earned a spot at the Democratic Party table. </p> <p> The policy direction Sanders was pushing was in the direction favored by the left/progressive side of the Democratic Party and that is the center of his support. Everyone in the Democratic Party [yeah, yeah I know Bernie is not a registered Democrat but I also remember how thrilled people on the left, including most if not all presently here, were when he won his Senatorial election and said he would caucus with the Democrats] who believes in a left/progressive direction for our government deserves some respect and representation from the leadership of that Party unless those leaders have an honesty attack and renounce a left/progressive philosophy of government.  </p> <p> I also don't think there is a danger of eliminating closed primaries but they should be eliminated in any election funded by tax dollars.  Same with the superdelegates. Unelected party insiders should not have a thirty percent nominating power that can be lined up behind closed doors in favor of one candidate before any others are even known to the voting public.  What is the <em>legitimate</em> process for getting a superdelegate slot that has not been grievously violated in at least some cases. What is the legitimate reason to allow an insider candidate a thirty percent head start while that candidate has not yet officially even announced but is instead out using their insider-ness to earn big bucks which I believe any intellectually honest person knows were paid with an <em><strong>expectation</strong></em> of gaining a profitable return even if they can convince themselves that in this case the money will not succeed in buying wrongful influence.</p> <p> <a href="https://www.rt.com/shows/on-contact/347418-counter-establishment-politics-sawant/">Here</a> is my recommended video for this morning.  I am gone until this evening, maybe longer, so will come back when I can to take my licks. </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:17:24 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 224753 at http://dagblog.com Obama beat Romney (popular http://dagblog.com/comment/224751#comment-224751 <a id="comment-224751"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/224689#comment-224689">The hardcore Sanders</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obama beat Romney (popular vote) approximately 66,000,000 to 61,000,000.  I wonder if Bernie thinks that, in order to give the 61,000,000 who did not vote for him, Obama should have given Romney a seat at the table to set policy and also to change Democratic Party rules?</p> <p>If not, why not?</p> <p>I don't think there is any danger of eliminating closed Primaries (in fact, I hope they eliminate open ones), but the fact that Bernie thinks he should even have a say in it is laughable.  I just heard him on CNN saying,  "<strong><u>We</u></strong> are working with <strong><u>them</u></strong>," meaning the Democratic Party.</p> <p>That says it all, in case someone might have missed it.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:24:30 +0000 CVille Dem comment 224751 at http://dagblog.com Nomiki Konst explains why http://dagblog.com/comment/224750#comment-224750 <a id="comment-224750"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/no-ordinary-primary-no-uniting-behind-fraud-20810">This is NO ORDINARY PRIMARY = No Uniting Behind FRAUD.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a class="profileLink" href="https://www.facebook.com/nomikikonst/" id="js_vj">Nomiki Konst</a> explains why must contact <a class="profileLink" href="https://www.facebook.com/MayorByronBrown/">Mayor Byron W. Brown</a> (NYS Chair) 212 725-8825 - <a href="mailto:chair@nydems.org">chair@nydems.org</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/wearethemedia2016/videos/591593127688385/">https://www.facebook.com/wearethemedia2016/videos/591593127688385/</a></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:58:36 +0000 synchronicity comment 224750 at http://dagblog.com (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/224749#comment-224749 <a id="comment-224749"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/no-ordinary-primary-no-uniting-behind-fraud-20810">This is NO ORDINARY PRIMARY = No Uniting Behind FRAUD.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gWplfSXSPkk?list=PLdi9R2OWN6k5Cp6PY5egBfTbr2UrUsnEi" width="560px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jun 2016 08:41:36 +0000 synchronicity comment 224749 at http://dagblog.com FANFARE FOR THE COMMON MORON: http://dagblog.com/comment/224735#comment-224735 <a id="comment-224735"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/224725#comment-224725">Election Fraud Watch 2016</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p class="rtecenter"><strong>FANFARE FOR THE COMMON MORON:</strong></p> <p class="rtecenter"> </p> <p class="rtecenter"> </p><div class="media_embed" height="360px" width="480px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FLMVB0B1_Ts" width="480px"></iframe></div> <p>Seems applicable for this thread.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jun 2016 02:26:22 +0000 NCD comment 224735 at http://dagblog.com That video was made 2 weeks http://dagblog.com/comment/224734#comment-224734 <a id="comment-224734"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/224721#comment-224721">(No subject)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That video was made 2 weeks ago.</p> <p>In the video he says 'every day that goes by that this fraud is not uncovered is a crime'. It's been 20 days and no lawsuit. 20 'crimes' by the Professor?</p> <p>Fitrakis has rushed out a short 100+ page book on this specific 'fraud' subject for sale at Amazon.</p> <p>As I said before on Professor Fitrakis, books make money, lawsuits cost money.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jun 2016 02:23:50 +0000 NCD comment 224734 at http://dagblog.com I agree.  It has become http://dagblog.com/comment/224730#comment-224730 <a id="comment-224730"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/224726#comment-224726">The primary wasn&#039;t rigged</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree.  It has become pathological, and I think responding with objective information just feeds into it.  I'm out too.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Jun 2016 01:37:28 +0000 CVille Dem comment 224730 at http://dagblog.com