http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/presidential-race-psephology-does-not-rely-psychological-punditry-20858 Comments for "The Presidential Race: Psephology Does Not Rely on Psychological Punditry" en http://dagblog.com/comment/225543#comment-225543 <a id="comment-225543"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/presidential-race-psephology-does-not-rely-psychological-punditry-20858">The Presidential Race: Psephology Does Not Rely on Psychological Punditry</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Orange Rage Muppet is trailing ! </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jul 2016 23:44:40 +0000 NCD comment 225543 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/225539#comment-225539 <a id="comment-225539"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/presidential-race-psephology-does-not-rely-psychological-punditry-20858">The Presidential Race: Psephology Does Not Rely on Psychological Punditry</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hi Ducky!</p> <p>Yeah I think about the cut and paste.</p> <p>What the hell do the pundits really know that we don't?</p> <p>Anyway as of July 7th, sanity is on its way.</p> <p>On the other hand....we must find some way to get OUT THE VOTE.</p> <p>Again, there is George Wallace and Helms and a host of other politicians who 'broke the rules' and blah blah blah.</p> <p>hahahahah</p> <p>Just let Trump keep on keepin on. Let him speak to the 'masses'.</p> <p>Something tells me I am in for something goooooooooooood</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="420px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/YFijHpB-IQQ" width="420px"></iframe></div> <p>Hillary is my 'girl'! So I am a sexist prick?</p> <p>Probably. hahaha</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 07 Jul 2016 22:33:37 +0000 Richard Day comment 225539 at http://dagblog.com