dagblog - Comments for "Queue The Dagblog Civil War v. 1,354,752" http://dagblog.com/queue-dagblog-civil-war-v-1354752-20881 Comments for "Queue The Dagblog Civil War v. 1,354,752" en For that kind of money I http://dagblog.com/comment/226165#comment-226165 <a id="comment-226165"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226029#comment-226029">What color hood? What brand</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>For that kind of money I would let them pick!<img alt="wink" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.png" title="wink" width="23" /></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:18:40 +0000 Danny Cardwell comment 226165 at http://dagblog.com Bernie was never required to http://dagblog.com/comment/226044#comment-226044 <a id="comment-226044"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/225915#comment-225915">For the record I never</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bernie was never required to give details on policy, he just repeated "millionaires and billionaires".</p> <p>He selected surrogates that were obviously out to make political points rather than effect any change in the Democratic Party. I point out Cornel West, because he was chosen by Sanders despite clear evidence that West would stab the Democratic Party and Barack Obama the first chance he got. West was immoral enough to accept a spot on the Democratic Party Platform Committee. Once he got to make a show there, he quickly endorsed Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate. West knew that he wouldn't be supporting the Democrats. Sanders should have known West would not support the Democrats. Sanders was a sucker.</p> <p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/14/barack-obama-us-racism-police-brutality-failed-victims">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/14/barack-obama-us-ra...</a></p> <p>​My problem with Bernie Sanders is that he is politically myopic. He can survive in Vermont, but is a disaster nationally.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2016 19:23:21 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 226044 at http://dagblog.com Every insurgency has kooks http://dagblog.com/comment/226031#comment-226031 <a id="comment-226031"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/225911#comment-225911">The value of the ideas are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Every insurgency has kooks and narcissists, no? As does the establishment. Still, claiming Bernie had a path to the nomination as his numbers said no, while flipping on superdelegates to get them to drop Hillary &amp; somehow support him came out both. Doesnt mean his campaign was only that, but it wasn't his best moment.</p> <p>Nor was the excessive reliance on exit polls and national faceoffs still 4 months away to justify his existence. Oh well, cant criticize anything these days.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:21:58 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 226031 at http://dagblog.com Despite all the insults http://dagblog.com/comment/226032#comment-226032 <a id="comment-226032"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226005#comment-226005">To answer Wolraich&#039;s question</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Despite all the insults towards her, I've never gotten the idea she belittled the ideas, only the process and path to making these things work. She's not big into unicorns and fairies from what I see.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:19:59 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 226032 at http://dagblog.com What color hood? What brand http://dagblog.com/comment/226029#comment-226029 <a id="comment-226029"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/225912#comment-225912">Speaking from the perspective</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What color hood? What brand gloves? A certain pastiche required.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:13:09 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 226029 at http://dagblog.com I like the ambiguity of http://dagblog.com/comment/226023#comment-226023 <a id="comment-226023"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/225906#comment-225906">Uncomfortable might be the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I like the ambiguity of "uncomfortable" precisely because it can be good or bad. I believe in Sanders insurgency, but not all insurgencies are good.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2016 12:42:39 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 226023 at http://dagblog.com Well put, ac http://dagblog.com/comment/226022#comment-226022 <a id="comment-226022"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226005#comment-226005">To answer Wolraich&#039;s question</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well put, ac</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 17 Jul 2016 12:35:28 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 226022 at http://dagblog.com To answer Wolraich's question http://dagblog.com/comment/226005#comment-226005 <a id="comment-226005"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/225893#comment-225893">Sanders is an insurgent. An</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>To answer Wolraich's question (way upthread), Bernie's campaign is indeed "just the first battle in a long struggle for the soul of the Democratic Party." Actually not the first, but the first to gain serious traction. The DNC (and Hillary) would be idiots to downplay and ignore what is clearly a substantial, growing movement, especially among young prospective voters. Republican disarray gives her a unique opportunity to change the entire political discourse over the next four years -- if she has the balls and the brains to seize it.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 16 Jul 2016 21:25:02 +0000 acanuck comment 226005 at http://dagblog.com For the record I never http://dagblog.com/comment/225915#comment-225915 <a id="comment-225915"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/225911#comment-225911">The value of the ideas are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>For the record I never depicted Sanders as a kook. That was more rmrd's complaint. I didn't have a problem when he was discussing his policy ideas. When that wasn't winning for him and he talked less and less about the policy and spent more and more time in character assassination I wasn't happy. When he played the sore loser, yes, I called him narcissistic.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:49:28 +0000 ocean-kat comment 225915 at http://dagblog.com Or no trade deals or tariffs http://dagblog.com/comment/225914#comment-225914 <a id="comment-225914"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/225909#comment-225909">There&#039;s also the side effects</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Or no trade deals or tariffs pushing up the costs of consumer goods. There are always trade offs. We need to find a better balance but trade deals are necessary. NO, isn't an answer to the problems, and benefits, globalization brings.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:40:33 +0000 ocean-kat comment 225914 at http://dagblog.com