dagblog - Comments for "Kaine,Catholicism and grammatical tricks" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/kainecatholicism-and-grammatical-tricks-20912 Comments for "Kaine,Catholicism and grammatical tricks" en Having worked in Reproductive http://dagblog.com/comment/226604#comment-226604 <a id="comment-226604"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226595#comment-226595">Let me walk you through it.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Having worked in Reproductive Medicine/IVF for many years. I can tell you pregnancy tests are positive:  i.e.: sperm met egg, and pregnancy tests were positive and eventually, sadly, often fail.  </p> <p>Is that an abortion?</p> <p>Pregnancies continue, and sometimes fail.  </p> <p>Is that an abortion?</p> <p>Sometimes the sperm and egg meet and develop in the Fallopian tube. It is a life-threatening situation, requiring either medications to end that pregnancy, or sometimes surgery.</p> <p>Is that an abortion?</p> <p>I guess my point is that this is not as simple as your post labels it to be.  I once saw an embryos heart-beat in a Fallopian tube while the other embryo (where it was supposed to be) with no heart-beat.  At this level of development these are cellular, and we need to be realistic about the difference between these cellular creations and living people.</p> <p>edited for clarity</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:30:09 +0000 CVille Dem comment 226604 at http://dagblog.com You are too cynical. Once http://dagblog.com/comment/226650#comment-226650 <a id="comment-226650"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226627#comment-226627">Really, what is amazing about</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are too cynical. Once Obama voiced his opinion, the NAACP followed suit. Polling indicated a shift away from opposing Gay Rights in the black community. It was a tectonic shift. Conservative black preachers were caught off guard and left behind.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:48:04 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 226650 at http://dagblog.com Abortion is stigmatized. That http://dagblog.com/comment/226649#comment-226649 <a id="comment-226649"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226647#comment-226647">It was Bill Clinton who made</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Abortion is stigmatized. That phrase sounds human.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:26:40 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 226649 at http://dagblog.com It was Bill Clinton who made http://dagblog.com/comment/226647#comment-226647 <a id="comment-226647"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226645#comment-226645">If anyone ever bothered to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It was Bill Clinton who made the phrase famous. I've heard Hillary Clinton say it too, with and without qualifiers. My central point is that that framing has been harmful in that it<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/09/hillary-clinton-abortion-legal-but-rare"> stigmatizes </a>abortion.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:49:35 +0000 kyle flynn comment 226647 at http://dagblog.com If anyone ever bothered to http://dagblog.com/comment/226645#comment-226645 <a id="comment-226645"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226630#comment-226630">Depends on what the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If anyone ever bothered to read a full Hillary quote, she said because it's typically a tragic decision. That sense of tragic may change over time, but even with (often withheld) medical abortion it's still often unsettling.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:23:33 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 226645 at http://dagblog.com Pretty sure I agree. Entirely http://dagblog.com/comment/226644#comment-226644 <a id="comment-226644"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226636#comment-226636"> Let&#039;s stipulate that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Pretty sure I agree. Entirely.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:02:33 +0000 kyle flynn comment 226644 at http://dagblog.com  Let's stipulate that http://dagblog.com/comment/226636#comment-226636 <a id="comment-226636"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226625#comment-226625">Whoa. There are plenty of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> Let's stipulate that successful societies  tolerate  a broad range of individual  beliefs. That seems to work. </p> <p>Not <u>all</u> beliefs, we can think of exceptions. But we make an  effort to go pretty far.</p> <p>To tell someone that she can't be President because she worships a particular God, or none, makes her less than a full member of the  society. Less than a full American. </p> <p>We  square this circle imo by saying that each of us can worship our own God pretty much as we see fit provided we impose  as little as possible on everyone else.  </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Jul 2016 06:44:05 +0000 Flavius comment 226636 at http://dagblog.com I haven't avoided that at all http://dagblog.com/comment/226632#comment-226632 <a id="comment-226632"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226631#comment-226631">&quot;It&#039;s none of your damn</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I haven't avoided that at all. From up thread to you:</p> <blockquote> <p>I'm perfectly aware of how complicated this debate gets the further a woman's pregnancy advances. Again, none of our business. Between a woman and her Healthcare providers. Full stop. </p> </blockquote> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:58:28 +0000 kyle flynn comment 226632 at http://dagblog.com "It's none of your damn http://dagblog.com/comment/226631#comment-226631 <a id="comment-226631"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226617#comment-226617">Okay. We disagree about that.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"It's none of your damn business" might sound good in the moment but would only be a starting point in the discussion. You would then have to defend unrestricted third trimester abortion on demand. That's the discussion you've been avoiding because even you know it's totally indefensible.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:38:16 +0000 ocean-kat comment 226631 at http://dagblog.com Depends on what the http://dagblog.com/comment/226630#comment-226630 <a id="comment-226630"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/226628#comment-226628">I again am not female, but my</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Depends on what the definition of is is. Rare because it would be simple to reduce abortions if a, b and c, or rare because, c'mon, it's abhorrent. But you already know this.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:31:37 +0000 kyle flynn comment 226630 at http://dagblog.com