dagblog - Comments for "Can We Grow Dagblog?" http://dagblog.com/can-we-grow-dagblog-21035 Comments for "Can We Grow Dagblog?" en 1. Hire a Dagblog Hasbarista: http://dagblog.com/comment/228023#comment-228023 <a id="comment-228023"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/can-we-grow-dagblog-21035">Can We Grow Dagblog?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>1. Hire a Dagblog Hasbarista: (I suggest Natasha G-M, she is already in the public relations sphere, has an obvious interest in the site, and will probably work for a percentage of the ad revenue--wait, what??)  Job duties, whenever a foolish opinion is expressed on Facebook, instead of tediously rebutting the same, merely link to the apposite Dagblog post</p> <p> </p> <p>Some of us (me?) do this already with our own posts, but I don't think anyone is systematically disseminating the accumulated wit and wisdom of the entire cohort of posters.   </p> <p> </p> <p>I recently had occasion to repost a few items on Mona's FB page, in a discussion of HRC's virtues/vices (the latter always a favorite of mine...)</p> <p>. (This may be why the posts in question are still ticking along after maybe a year, pushing 30k hits....see, eg, today's list which includes one of them...)</p> <p>2. Make readership sticky--in this endeavor, restore the RSS button that we lost when the servers were changed</p> <p> </p> <p>3. Search Engine Optimization--this is Genghis' purview, I think.  At present, I notice that when I want to dredge up some post from years ago , I have trouble getting the Google to perform.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 01 Sep 2016 17:08:49 +0000 jollyroger comment 228023 at http://dagblog.com No wonder we can't get an http://dagblog.com/comment/227947#comment-227947 <a id="comment-227947"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/227946#comment-227946">So annoyed by this year&#039;s go</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No wonder we can't get an audience with such retro thinking - we need Pokemon Go boobies in 3D augmented reality. Walking along and boom, 6 ft tall attacks. How we lead back to news Idunno...</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 28 Aug 2016 06:28:01 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 227947 at http://dagblog.com So annoyed by this year's go http://dagblog.com/comment/227946#comment-227946 <a id="comment-227946"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/227939#comment-227939">Pasties on parade? A</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So annoyed by this year's go topless day.  I'm supposed to see boobies IRL. right?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 28 Aug 2016 01:24:49 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 227946 at http://dagblog.com Pasties on parade? A http://dagblog.com/comment/227939#comment-227939 <a id="comment-227939"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/227938#comment-227938">High quality news articles</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Pasties on parade? A potential Dag specialty.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Aug 2016 19:39:59 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 227939 at http://dagblog.com High quality news articles http://dagblog.com/comment/227938#comment-227938 <a id="comment-227938"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/227914#comment-227914">I think more porn search</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>High quality <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/go-topless-go-bare-breasts-song_us_57c0868ae4b085c1ff293d71?section=&amp;">news articles like this one </a>from Huff post will get us the numbers we're looking for. The journalists there are not only linking it on the front news page and the politics section but pushing it at the bottom of  many of the articles.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Aug 2016 19:21:41 +0000 ocean-kat comment 227938 at http://dagblog.com Now that's a challenge - a Mr http://dagblog.com/comment/227920#comment-227920 <a id="comment-227920"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/227893#comment-227893">Yeah, what suggestions</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Now that's a challenge - a Mr Smith raffle? They had naked weatherlady for a while - maybe naked Haiku dude? Or the stripdown Vanna White wheel of fortune thing - one piece of clothing per tetrain? Maybe everyone in the Masthead could do their part - with power comes responsibility...</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Aug 2016 05:15:43 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 227920 at http://dagblog.com Prick Roll? http://dagblog.com/comment/227919#comment-227919 <a id="comment-227919"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/227914#comment-227914">I think more porn search</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Prick Roll?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Aug 2016 05:07:50 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 227919 at http://dagblog.com I think more porn search http://dagblog.com/comment/227914#comment-227914 <a id="comment-227914"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/can-we-grow-dagblog-21035">Can We Grow Dagblog?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think more porn search terms in opening paragraphs would be a big help.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:50:08 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 227914 at http://dagblog.com Oh Mike, you know more than I http://dagblog.com/comment/227909#comment-227909 <a id="comment-227909"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/227908#comment-227908">We had ads, remember? They</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh Mike, you know more than I do.</p> <p>I accept your explanation.</p> <p>Sorry.</p> <p>Hell, you are doing something right. Hell, I have been here almost 8 years.</p> <p>And we get a lot of traffic.</p> <p>I am just happy being able to blog here.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Aug 2016 01:41:52 +0000 Richard Day comment 227909 at http://dagblog.com We had ads, remember? They http://dagblog.com/comment/227908#comment-227908 <a id="comment-227908"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/227886#comment-227886">Hey Danny, you make my day.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We had ads, remember? They never made much money, not enough to justify their clutter. Plus the existence of a revenue stream, however small, opens us up to liability.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Aug 2016 01:36:34 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 227908 at http://dagblog.com