dagblog - Comments for "Balanced Coverage and Baseball" http://dagblog.com/politics/balanced-coverage-and-baseball-21069 Comments for "Balanced Coverage and Baseball" en ahh-plausibility.... http://dagblog.com/comment/228152#comment-228152 <a id="comment-228152"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/228146#comment-228146">Nice Polite Republicans Radio</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ahh-plausibility....</p> <p><img alt="" height="253" src="http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/WGB07hPGeBA/maxresdefault.jpg" width="450" /></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 07 Sep 2016 05:31:57 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 228152 at http://dagblog.com Maybe that's what Fox means http://dagblog.com/comment/228148#comment-228148 <a id="comment-228148"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/balanced-coverage-and-baseball-21069">Balanced Coverage and Baseball</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe that's what Fox means by (Fair and) Balanced?  <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/09/04/fox-s-chris-wallace-its-not-my-role-presidential-debate-moderator-be-truth-squad/212845">http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/09/04/fox-s-chris-wallace-its-not-my-...</a></p> <p>Of course, Chuck Todd said nearly the same thing years ago - <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/chuck-todd-it-s-not-media-s-job-to-correct-gop-s-obamacare-falsehoods-video">http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/chuck-todd-it-s-not-media-s-job-to...</a>.  He's also on record as saying that if he asks questions that are too tough then he won't get the guests back on his show, and what could possibly be more important than that?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Sep 2016 19:50:54 +0000 Jon comment 228148 at http://dagblog.com One quibble:  it was Florida http://dagblog.com/comment/228147#comment-228147 <a id="comment-228147"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/balanced-coverage-and-baseball-21069">Balanced Coverage and Baseball</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>One quibble:  it was Florida's AG (Bondi), not a DA, who accepted the donation and then in a completely unrelated development chose not to pursue charges against Trump U.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Sep 2016 19:40:39 +0000 Jon comment 228147 at http://dagblog.com Nice Polite Republicans Radio http://dagblog.com/comment/228146#comment-228146 <a id="comment-228146"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/228129#comment-228129">Driftglass on &#039;serious</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nice Polite Republicans Radio, Morning Edition:</p> <blockquote> <p><em>9/6-"this campaign anything but traditional (ohhh?....on both sides..?), it is a horse race, <strong>Trump</strong> has had trouble with message discipline (has he, did he say so, the KKK loves it..?) and <strong>has changed that recently has narrowed gap</strong>, Trump is now <strong>staying on message </strong>(or obfuscating and dissempbling?) he says he will "restore America's strength in world, says China pushing US around".</em></p> <p><em>Why is this so close Mara Liasson? </em></p> <p><em>Mara: Both sides are the most unpopular candidates ever, both have historically high unfavorablity, more than half supporters from both sides say vote is against a candidate, so inspite of all Hillary endorsements race is close, the electorate is in the mood for change, <strong>the change candidate is Donald Trump </strong>yet he has not yet passed the plausibility test with enough voters, we wait for the debates..</em>..</p> </blockquote> <p>Mara Liasson: <strong><em>"Trump has not passed the plausibility test".</em></strong>....which is exactly what???</p> <p>Plausibility to be the leader of America and the free world?</p> <p>Does that have anything to do with his record of never holding or running for public or government office?</p> <p>Never specifying details of policy beyond 'making it great, ending something the first day or first week in office'.</p> <p>Record of lawsuits, bankruptcies, scams and business failures, incendiary statements, dislike of him and his statements from abroad, reckless positions on NATO and treaty commitments, ludicrous plans like 'the wall' paid for by Mexico?</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Sep 2016 16:16:56 +0000 NCD comment 228146 at http://dagblog.com Driftglass on 'serious http://dagblog.com/comment/228129#comment-228129 <a id="comment-228129"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/balanced-coverage-and-baseball-21069">Balanced Coverage and Baseball</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://driftglass.blogspot.com">Driftglass</a> on 'serious journalists':</p> <p>"After years of maintaining the Big Both Siderist Lie by lending its tattered mantle of respectability to an increasingly dangerous and bizarre gallery of Conservative lunatics and con men in order to achieve "balance", the Beltway media finally arrived at the place it was headed all along:  with a Republican Party which was now so openly and confidently racist and insane that there is no possibility of wishing it away any longer."</p> <p class="rtecenter"> DG <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Shining-Jack-Nicholson/dp/B002VWNIDG/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1473136177&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=the+shing+dvd">Shines</a> light on 2 of the tribe, Brooks &amp; Fournier:</p> <p class="rtecenter"><img alt="" height="371" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_eY4j7IDL7s/VfbXY5vqYKI/AAAAAAAAOS4/0oAyqWie8ws/s1600/BrooksFournierTheShining.jpg" width="400" /></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Sep 2016 04:33:04 +0000 NCD comment 228129 at http://dagblog.com This is really something Doc. http://dagblog.com/comment/228125#comment-228125 <a id="comment-228125"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/balanced-coverage-and-baseball-21069">Balanced Coverage and Baseball</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is really something Doc.</p> <p>Just as an aside, Q once hit one of my blogs in the last few years and honored my Minnesota Twins.</p> <p>We had this batter by the name of Tony Oliva who was one of the greatest batters of all time.</p> <p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Oliva">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Oliva</a></p> <p>He was batting over 400 one year and the pitchers just began throwing at his head.</p> <p>It was a damn shame.</p> <p>Oliva was hit so damn many times, he lost his mojo.</p> <p>Tony ended up hitting 380 or so.</p> <p>BUT DAMN!</p> <p>One side of this election contest is way off the mark.</p> <p>There are no rules.</p> <p>And in the end, the supposed 'umpires' have no sense of fairness.</p> <p>As the bad guys just throw their entrails.</p> <p>hahahahah</p> <p>​The only umps we have in this nation are the voters.</p> <p>LET US PRAY.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Sep 2016 03:20:21 +0000 Richard Day comment 228125 at http://dagblog.com