Thanks.

Flavius — Tue, 06 Sep 2016 10:43:18 +0000

In reply to Typically this could go under

Thanks.

Typically this could go under

PeraclesPlease — Tue, 06 Sep 2016 07:24:17 +0000

In reply to OK Guys read E-Ghazi

Typically this could go under News anyway - http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/9/5/1566896/-E-Ghazi-The-FBI-report...

"Armando"s blog is followed

Flavius — Tue, 06 Sep 2016 04:30:51 +0000

In reply to OK Guys read E-Ghazi

"Armando"s blog is followed by 30 pages of comments from a plethora of participants clearly from inside the whale:

people who work in the field and approach the subject already knowledgeable in the way you can only be as the result of day-to-day involvement. Reading them not only at least brought me up to speed to a level approximating

that of the more than casually involved media, but also gave me pretty strong confidence in what has always been my gut feeling that at the end of the day "there's no there, there".

That feels good.

The truth doesn't it always win but it's still a damn site better than the alternative. If only because when you start

out trying to confuse your opponents sooner or later you confuse yourself:

' ere how do we get home?

dagblog - Comments for "OK Guys read E-Ghazi"

Thanks.

Typically this could go under

"Armando"s blog is followed