dagblog - Comments for "Donald Trump, Low T Candidate"

In related news, terrorists

jollyroger — Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:38:37 +0000

In reply to Low T-Count?

In related news, terrorists are using the prospect of a Trump presidency to raise money...

Low T-Count?

oldenGoldenDecoy — Tue, 20 Sep 2016 03:50:37 +0000

In reply to Donald Trump, Low T Candidate

Low T-Count?

Oh les Canadiens...

http://beaus.ca/

~OGD~

True, "incurious" is one of

jollyroger — Mon, 19 Sep 2016 01:23:51 +0000

In reply to Your mistake is thinking

True, "incurious" is one of the most frequent words pick00ed to describe him by a wide variety of acquaintances.

Your mistake is thinking

ocean-kat — Sun, 18 Sep 2016 23:45:32 +0000

In reply to The meta: What should we

Your mistake is thinking Trump knows or cares to know about anything. Oz said his T was very good. That's all Trump cares about. he doesn't care whether it's true or false, whether the person saying it is knowledgable or a fool, whether they are a good person or a bad person. All he cares about is that someone said he was very good in some way.

The meta: What should we

jollyroger — Sun, 18 Sep 2016 23:19:14 +0000

In reply to Donald Trump, Low T Candidate

The meta: What should we infer about Deadbeat Donald's assessment vis-a-vis the blind credulity upon which he can safely count .

He has taken care wherever possible to avoid precision, numerical precision above all.

How the fuck does he have the balls (pun intended) to fuckin' FLAuNT a testosterone number that is manifestly punk?

Surely I cannot be the only person with the curiosity to google what his number means?

Granted he didn't "grow u[" with The Google, but still!

Peniscillin is still your

PeraclesPlease — Sun, 18 Sep 2016 18:40:34 +0000

In reply to <opengroan>Well, sure, but be

Peniscillin is still your ticket out of this mess - unless you are indeed an Elephant Man., in which case dragging it around like ball and chain is just your fate. At least easy to trail.

That comment seemed to be

CVille Dem — Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:13:05 +0000

In reply to You must have missed the memo

That comment seemed to be deserved to me. But I know you have to be firm with ladies like me. I simply can't take HRC insults lying down. I didn't know you had modified your position. This is huge!

OK, I am punned out. TRUCE!!!!!

Well, sure, but be

jollyroger — Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:02:44 +0000

In reply to Hmmm, singular? I figured you

<opengroan>Well, sure, but be on notice: My ONE outweighs most twos...<closegroan>

Hmmm, singular? I figured you

PeraclesPlease — Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:59:14 +0000

In reply to I got your testy right here..

Hmmm, singular? I figured you had 2 or 3 testies. No wonder you been grumpy.

You must have missed the memo

jollyroger — Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:56:10 +0000

In reply to I got your testy right here..

You must have missed the memo--I have modified my position on HRC...

Having elsewhere conceded that she may have understandable urgings towards the guardedness and orwellian word usage that makes us grind our teeth, and surveying the present lay of the land, one could posit the following scenario which would weaponize the continued secrecy of the transcripts:

HRC-you see my transcripts, we see your tax returns

AND, since we all know you to be a deadbeat and a welsher, the information is lodged in escrow with a third party before any release.

It will convey his lack of trustworthiness and her use of leverage simultaneously.

This manuever, of course, is available only because she stonewalled.