dagblog - Comments for "THE DEBATES LIVE; 100 MILLION CANNOT BE WRONG!" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/debates-live-100-million-cannot-be-wrong-21156 Comments for "THE DEBATES LIVE; 100 MILLION CANNOT BE WRONG!" en Thanx Peracles (i think, ha) http://dagblog.com/comment/228814#comment-228814 <a id="comment-228814"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/228813#comment-228813">Dick, for days you&#039;ve had me</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanx Peracles (i think, ha)</p> <p>You and I have witnessed lies from politicians for many decades. ha</p> <p>But this sombitch Trump, trumps it all.</p> <p>The polls tell us Trump aint out of the running.</p> <p>And this guy is the most despicable fellow I have ever seen.</p> <p>Nixon was a prick but besides for Vietnam, it is hard to fault him as a President--except for his hidden war chest and election felonies and....hahahaahha</p> <p>Can 40 million or more citizens be wrong. hahahahah</p> <p>I sometimes wish to wash my hands of all this like the late Carlin.</p> <p>But damn.</p> <p>I keep being drawn into this mess.</p> <p>Emails. Who gives a shit?</p> <p>Okay, that is enough.</p> <p>Except I feel in my very soul that this shall be the year of the WOMAN:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4gpNqB4dnT4" width="560px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:31:11 +0000 Richard Day comment 228814 at http://dagblog.com Dick, for days you've had me http://dagblog.com/comment/228813#comment-228813 <a id="comment-228813"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/debates-live-100-million-cannot-be-wrong-21156">THE DEBATES LIVE; 100 MILLION CANNOT BE WRONG!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Dick, for days you've had me tickled with the parallel "Eat shit, 50 billion flies can't be wrong".</p> <p>Perhaps more apt for this election anyway.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:07:29 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 228813 at http://dagblog.com That is amazing rmrd. http://dagblog.com/comment/228795#comment-228795 <a id="comment-228795"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/228793#comment-228793">A Fox News exec had to tell</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That is amazing rmrd.</p> <p>Maybe the dismissal of Ailes?</p> <p>Standards?</p> <p>I watched a few minutes of O'Reilly and he actually admitted that the 'polls' from Breitbart or Drudge were meaningless?</p> <p>Besides, if Trump had won, he would not be going around dissing his mike and Lester!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 28 Sep 2016 18:41:47 +0000 Richard Day comment 228795 at http://dagblog.com A Fox News exec had to tell http://dagblog.com/comment/228793#comment-228793 <a id="comment-228793"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/228792#comment-228792">Rachel noted that Fox thinks</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A Fox News exec had to tell their on air personalities that online polls do not meet Fox News standards. Who knew that there were standards at Fox?</p> <p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-online-debate-polls-trump-drudge-2016-9">http://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-online-debate-polls-trump-drudge...</a></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 28 Sep 2016 18:21:11 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 228793 at http://dagblog.com Rachel noted that Fox thinks http://dagblog.com/comment/228792#comment-228792 <a id="comment-228792"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/228791#comment-228791">It is Wednesday AM and I am</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Rachel noted that Fox thinks Trump won the debate, or at worst thought it was a draw.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 28 Sep 2016 13:39:52 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 228792 at http://dagblog.com It is Wednesday AM and I am http://dagblog.com/comment/228791#comment-228791 <a id="comment-228791"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/debates-live-100-million-cannot-be-wrong-21156">THE DEBATES LIVE; 100 MILLION CANNOT BE WRONG!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It is Wednesday AM and I am just getting around to reading all of this. One big takeaway is that virtually everyone agrees that HILLARY won this debate. That in itself is very important. Donald is saying he won, but only his supporters are listening to him.  Although I can't fathom being undecided at this point, anyone who is still making up their minds surely has a big chunk of information to process. </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:14:34 +0000 CVille Dem comment 228791 at http://dagblog.com Oh and here is the comedian http://dagblog.com/comment/228773#comment-228773 <a id="comment-228773"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/228765#comment-228765">Ratings for debate shows</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh and here is the comedian on the channel without Jon:</p> <p>(And he did not pre-tape, this is all strange. I mean no pre-taping?</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aUbzT25kZ6s" width="560px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:00:59 +0000 Richard Day comment 228773 at http://dagblog.com I thought the same thing http://dagblog.com/comment/228771#comment-228771 <a id="comment-228771"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/228768#comment-228768">I just responded to O-K. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I thought the same thing about her opening, and I guess Stokol's thrust would suggest an Ali manuever, the rope a dope at the debate.</p> <p> </p> <p>It's something of a caricature for him to mutter "That's business!" (it's not personal....) meaning that the <em>schmucks </em>who carry his weight as dumb taxpayers with <em>goyische kopfen</em> (wait, what??) shouldn't take it personally...</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:47:05 +0000 jollyroger comment 228771 at http://dagblog.com Trump is a goniff--he is on http://dagblog.com/comment/228770#comment-228770 <a id="comment-228770"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/228767#comment-228767">Yeah, you said it, O-K.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump is a goniff--he is on record via Crain's for having taken a  "middle-class" (for NYC)  income level benefit.</p> <p> </p> <p>There were two years of rebates  which are without peradventure tied to one's 1040 that are limited to an AGI of $500,000 or less.</p> <p> </p> <p>Paying LOW taxes (Romney) is one thing.  Paying NO taxes....</p> <p> </p> <p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/does-donald-trump-make-less-than-500000-a-year-2016-6">http://www.businessinsider.com/does-donald-trump-make-less-than-500000-a...</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:40:49 +0000 jollyroger comment 228770 at http://dagblog.com I have a couple more thoughts http://dagblog.com/comment/228769#comment-228769 <a id="comment-228769"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/228767#comment-228767">Yeah, you said it, O-K.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I have a couple more thoughts on this, hindsight.</p> <p>There are supposed to be two more debates as you point out.</p> <p>One hesitation here is that Trump falters and is tooooooo worried about failure and so he quits and says that 'it' is all stacked against truth and justice and the American way. That is possible.</p> <p>Funny thing, he was on FOX today and did not attack Lester Holt.</p> <p>I was amazed by this 'admission'.</p> <p>But he did blame the microphone. Which is hilarious. hahahaha</p> <p>Mr. Smith was the first to point out the sniffling and other links talk about his Marco like water issue. hahahah</p> <p>Blaming the mike is just soo sooooooooo funny.</p> <p>But, if there ARE further debates, Hillary shall just get better and Trump shall falter.</p> <p>My prediction.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:36:52 +0000 Richard Day comment 228769 at http://dagblog.com