dagblog - Comments for "The Trump "sex tape""

You've got it backwards,

Michael Wolraich — Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:13:00 +0000

In reply to WTF??!!

You've got it backwards, jolly. This testimony came before she went public with the accusation against Bill. She claimed to have perjured herself in the affidavit because she didn't want to be dragged through a trial.

So not a great witness, obviously, and this is out of the statute of limitations in any case, so no trial. But I don't rule out the story entirely. I'm not going to argue the case, certainly not right now. My point in raising it was just to correct Robert Farmer's comment there were no allegations of coercion.

In any case, I'm sure we'll hear more about her soon enough from the other braying back end of an ass who happens to be the Republican nominee. Buckle up.

WTF??!!

jollyroger — Sun, 09 Oct 2016 22:35:04 +0000

In reply to This is her most recent

WTF??!!

OK, Not only is this a dead mule to whom no mercy is being shown, I had no fuckin' idea that the woman herself had recanted!! (God knows, I have heard her name often enough from that braying back end of an ass Hannity).

Thanks, Jan.

ETA, apparently G. was equally misinformed, so I feel a little better.

This is her most recent

CVille Dem — Sun, 09 Oct 2016 21:50:16 +0000

In reply to My default position is to

This is her most recent affidavit:

http://www.anusha.com/janedoe5.htm

Relevant quotes from her sworn testimony:

3. I met President Clinton more than twenty years ago through family friends. Our introduction was not arranged or facilitated, in any way, by the Arkansas State Police. I have never been an Arkansas state employee or a federal employee. I have never discussed with Mr. Clinton the possibility of state or federal employment nor has he offered me any such position. I have had no further relations with him for the past (15) years.

4. During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family.

How can anyone keep whipping this dead mule?

My default position is to

ocean-kat — Sun, 09 Oct 2016 20:29:40 +0000

In reply to Juanita Broaddrick has

My default position is to believe the woman in cases like this. But at some point one has to make a decision. I look at this in a similar way I look at the Woody Allen accusations. Even more so with Bill. The allegations were looked at by competent prosecutorial investigations and found to not be credible. Granted, judicial investigations are not always credible so we have to ask ourselves, When are the investigations by the judicial system credible? Broaddrick was looked at a few times by very partisan republican prosecutors who wanted to do anything they could to get Clinton and even Ken Starr found her allegations not credible. For all Bill's sins, and there are many, I tend not to believe the rape accusation.

Ah, but Hillary gave her the

PeraclesPlease — Sun, 09 Oct 2016 18:51:27 +0000

In reply to Juanita Broaddrick has

Ah, but Hillary gave her the secret society handshake and did the Vulcan mindmeld with her - that can intimidate anyone but Obama (who inherited Spock's ears and his skill in13-dimensional chess, even though Spock was Jewish and Obama is Muslim).

The Starbucks over here

PeraclesPlease — Sun, 09 Oct 2016 18:45:16 +0000

In reply to So where do you recommend

The Starbucks over here doesnt carry it, but I suspect their competitor just might whip one up. & with it "grab your barista's Pastry" to go.

So where do you recommend

Michael Wolraich — Sun, 09 Oct 2016 15:04:10 +0000

In reply to I'll admit to having made

So where do you recommend going for a misogynist braggadocio fix? I've been looking for a good spot.

Juanita Broaddrick has

Michael Wolraich — Sun, 09 Oct 2016 14:56:44 +0000

In reply to Little bit of difference here

Juanita Broaddrick has accused Bill of rape, actually. I don't take her accusation at face value, but I don't rule it out either.

That said, Bill isn't running for president in 2016.

Little bit of difference here

Robert Farmer — Sun, 09 Oct 2016 14:04:47 +0000

In reply to No. I have no interest in

Little bit of difference here, Flavius. Weiner doesn't appear to be a predator. He's some kind of exhibitionist. Weird and scary perhaps, but ultimatimately, not a predator.

Gary Hart had an affair. whoopee. He probably had many. more whoopee. I don't recall anyone claiming he molested them without permission.

Same with Bill. For all the fooforaw, all the investigations, all the skullduggery, I don't recall assault or retaliatory coercion as part of the scenario.

Trump? Whole different scenario.

Both sides DON'T do it.

Never made. Did hear. In a

Flavius — Sun, 09 Oct 2016 13:14:31 +0000

In reply to I've been thinking about this

Never made (edited)such statements. Did hear. In a single sex Catholic college.

Sociologists surely have data on the subject. My guess is that the single sex characteristic may be determining.

Adolescent boys , contact with girls limited to the stylized behavior of an occasional Saturday night date, develop differently. At least for a while.