http://dagblog.com/link/hillary-and-optics-21243 Comments for "Hillary and Optics" en http://dagblog.com/comment/229357#comment-229357 <a id="comment-229357"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/hillary-and-optics-21243">Hillary and Optics</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/hillary-clinton-emails-wall-street-229825">Looks like some horse trading going on</a> - a good thing.</p> <p>But on the other side, Wikileaks taking stolen emails <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/15/politics/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-goldman-sachs-speeches/index.html?adkey=bn">to leak drip by drip the 3 weeks before the election</a> rather sucks. I'm glad they're not worse, but it's distinctly unfair - all the Clinton campaigns' private strategy discussions are laid out bare but only hers, and we all know Bismarck's comment on laws and sausage. Oh well, another case of Clinton Rules. At least it looks like she can survive them so far, but never say never. Trump's <a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-and-the-emasculated-voter-1476484865">loony base isn't abandoning him that quick</a>, so it's over when it's over, when the alternatively sized lady sings.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Oct 2016 23:19:53 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 229357 at http://dagblog.com