dagblog - Comments for "This Dumb Election" http://dagblog.com/dumb-election-21260 Comments for "This Dumb Election" en But actually Trump wasn't the http://dagblog.com/comment/229572#comment-229572 <a id="comment-229572"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229563#comment-229563">Very good point</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>But actually Trump wasn't the only one - during the Republican primaries, they were *all* letting their hair down more than in past years.</p> <p>And as long as they were hanging around the Republican tent, they could all pretend that they were just expressing mainstream opinion - just Donald being more direct than the others, willing to go that extra step. (Though wasn't Fiorina pushing that false abortion video the hardest? These people got problems.)</p> <p>Once they got out of the Republican echo chamber, especially getting called "deplorable", some got to self-examine a bit.</p> <p>[Pence is a good example of the standard GOP trick of speaking horrid rhetoric in calm boring tones so you almost think he's being adult, reasonable and not hateful. Trump partnering with him and then walking all over his schtick is unusual, just as was calling out George W. Bush for *not* protecting the country when the right had pretended for 15 years that letting 9/11 happen was somehow bold  - probably Donald's better truth-to-power statements were against recent Republican cant, not against Liberalism which tended to just sound typically unhinged and oblivious to any facts]</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:41:36 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 229572 at http://dagblog.com I appreciate the silver http://dagblog.com/comment/229566#comment-229566 <a id="comment-229566"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/dumb-election-21260">This Dumb Election</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I appreciate the silver lining you provide.<br /> You are right. The Republicans have become so policy free in this cycle that there is nothing to compromise with. They ended their nomination process by opening cans of dog food like Gibson did in that Mad Max movie.</p> <p>Go, Democratic Senate Majority.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:55:41 +0000 moat comment 229566 at http://dagblog.com Right on MikeM. http://dagblog.com/comment/229564#comment-229564 <a id="comment-229564"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/dumb-election-21260">This Dumb Election</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Right on MikeM.</p> <p>Again, And I keep saying it over and over again, Cruz and Rubio and Walker and so many other repubs would have done much better and then screwed us all. hahahahah</p> <p>Bernie kept Hillary honest and what a guy!</p> <p>We must check in next week when we have 12 days left.</p> <p>But it is looking goooooooooood. I still do not think we can get the House. But damn, a Senate with Kaine presiding will help us a lot.</p> <p>Hell, give us one or two more!</p> <p>Anyway I am elated that this has so far become a silly election.</p> <p>But my ballot is in the mail.</p> <p>LET US PRAY AND NOT PREY.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:57:57 +0000 Richard Day comment 229564 at http://dagblog.com Very good point http://dagblog.com/comment/229563#comment-229563 <a id="comment-229563"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229560#comment-229560">Trump didn&#039;t &#039;prevail&#039;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Very good point</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:00:22 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 229563 at http://dagblog.com Trump didn't 'prevail' http://dagblog.com/comment/229560#comment-229560 <a id="comment-229560"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/dumb-election-21260">This Dumb Election</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump didn't 'prevail' because of his 'sheer force of his personality'. Trump's personality is execrable.</p> <p>Which has only recently become obvious to the Trumpian uninitiated in the nation and the world, but was clear to many women, contractors, investors and suckers fleeced in his various scams.</p> <p>Failing to mention race, racism, hate or lies in discussing this election omits the elephant in the room. A very nasty part of this election. A part that objective observers must now see is crystal clear. </p> <p>A large part of the GOP base is not only uninformed, living in a Fox News/hate radio ideological bubble, near imbecilic in conspiracy beliefs, but also angry racists.</p> <p>The GOP uses all of these factors to exploit them for votes, and then leaves them high and dry as the GOP cuts taxes on the rich, further widening the nation's wealth inequality.</p> <p>Krugman's take on why Trump was nominated from <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/21/opinion/why-hillary-wins.html?action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=opinion-c-col-left-region&amp;region=opinion-c-col-left-region&amp;WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region">today's NYT</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Mr. Trump won the nomination because he gave his party’s base what it wanted, channeling the racial antagonism that has been the driving force for Republican electoral success for decades. All he did was say out loud what his rivals were trying to convey with dog whistles, which explains why they were so ineffective in opposing him.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:07:00 +0000 NCD comment 229560 at http://dagblog.com It may well be that 2012 was http://dagblog.com/comment/229559#comment-229559 <a id="comment-229559"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229558#comment-229558">Amen, brother. You said it.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It may well be that 2012 was just about the issues I pay more attention to, but I remember it being a referendum on Obama's handling of the Financial Crisis and, because of the credit downgrade in 2011, debt management and the sequester.</p> <p>Ah, 2012.  Those were the days. Foodies.  The iPhone 4S. Millenials with headphones ignoring you in the office... A simpler, better time.  I'm going to make America 2012 again.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:38:33 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 229559 at http://dagblog.com Amen, brother. You said it. http://dagblog.com/comment/229558#comment-229558 <a id="comment-229558"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/dumb-election-21260">This Dumb Election</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Amen, brother. You said it.</p> <p>(And yet, it has been exciting, hasn't it? Much more fun than 2012. Did we discuss anything important in 2012? I don't remember. They say Americans have short memories.)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:23:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 229558 at http://dagblog.com