dagblog - Comments for "Anthony Weiner-Insupportable opprobrium, the operational definition" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/anthony-weiner-insuportable-opprobrium-operational-definition-21291 Comments for "Anthony Weiner-Insupportable opprobrium, the operational definition" en small world!  (I'd kill for http://dagblog.com/comment/229856#comment-229856 <a id="comment-229856"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229852#comment-229852">In my cardiologist&#039;s waiting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>small world!  (I'd kill for his abs....)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:17:51 +0000 jollyroger comment 229856 at http://dagblog.com In my cardiologist's waiting http://dagblog.com/comment/229852#comment-229852 <a id="comment-229852"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/anthony-weiner-insuportable-opprobrium-operational-definition-21291">Anthony Weiner-Insupportable opprobrium, the operational definition</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In my cardiologist's waiting room I listened to a woman  who'd worked for Weiner. Without going intoa two guns blazing defence of the guy she argued pretty strongly that Obamacare wouldn't have had a chance of passing without him.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:39:51 +0000 Flavius comment 229852 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, I hadn't even gotten http://dagblog.com/comment/229851#comment-229851 <a id="comment-229851"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229850#comment-229850">It took the FBI two weeks to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I hadn't even gotten beyond the Oct. 3 date and the strange time interval you flag--like, what, they take the laptop to the office and then don't pick it back up for weeks? Don't even LOOK at the emails?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:58:35 +0000 jollyroger comment 229851 at http://dagblog.com It took the FBI two weeks to http://dagblog.com/comment/229850#comment-229850 <a id="comment-229850"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229848#comment-229848">We now have a more granular</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It took the FBI two weeks to remotely load all those extra e-mails.  The other two weeks was taken up in disagreements over what to name the file.  Once they came up with "Life Insurance," the die was cast.  Then they only had to wait until 11 days prior to the election to send the non-letter out.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:42:39 +0000 CVille Dem comment 229850 at http://dagblog.com We now have a more granular http://dagblog.com/comment/229848#comment-229848 <a id="comment-229848"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229714#comment-229714">Did ever laptop, phone or</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We now have a more granular time line--Aug. 29 he is exposed to Child Protective Services inquiries due to inclusion of his son in a "sexted" picture</p> <p> </p> <p>September 28 story runs in Daily Mail about 15 year old </p> <p> </p> <p>October 3 laptop seized.</p> <p> </p> <p>How in the name of your deity of choice could any of these devices have survived the first moment of inquiry?</p> <p> </p> <p>(Not fer'nuttin', HRC is said to have hammered more than one blackberry upon retiring it--you don't hear anything about files being found on those blackberries, do ya'?)</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:39:25 +0000 jollyroger comment 229848 at http://dagblog.com Did ever laptop, phone or http://dagblog.com/comment/229714#comment-229714 <a id="comment-229714"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/anthony-weiner-insuportable-opprobrium-operational-definition-21291">Anthony Weiner-Insupportable opprobrium, the operational definition</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Did ever laptop, phone or tablet cry out for the hammer like Weiner's?  "How could any device on which he plied his trade survive past his first knowledge that he was "hot" (not in the good sense...)</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:22:43 +0000 jollyroger comment 229714 at http://dagblog.com