dagblog - Comments for "As I was saying comey will know before Nov 8" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/comey-will-know-nov-8-21307 Comments for "As I was saying comey will know before Nov 8" en There are several outcomes of http://dagblog.com/comment/229912#comment-229912 <a id="comment-229912"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229862#comment-229862">With truly awesome respect, I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There are several outcomes of an expedited review that could seriously redress the damage.  </p> <p> For one,it could be found that all the emails in question were simple duplicates of previously reviewed ones (which is actually the  most likely situation--it sounds like there were multiple back ups created unintentionally, with  nested attachments, etc.</p> <p> </p> <p>Or, Hillary might not be either sender or receiver of a great number, and the rest might be dupes,  </p> <p> </p> <p>I really doubt that the missing 30k are going to surface on this machine, which is the implied big kahuna.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 04 Nov 2016 06:52:19 +0000 jollyroger comment 229912 at http://dagblog.com That's great, but the GOP http://dagblog.com/comment/229865#comment-229865 <a id="comment-229865"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229862#comment-229862">With truly awesome respect, I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's great, but the GOP parades "100 classified" and suggests hacking her to find the lost 30,000 emails - the actual tiny potential damage of 4 emails doesn't make it through the media machine - not Fox's coverage, not NY Times reporting, especially not Trump's speeches.</p> <p>Again, NY Times' *BOARD* put a period in the middle of Hillary's sentence to make something like "open borders for energy" into "open borders." Sure, some facts *could be* better than no facts, but I'm skeptical that even flattering news would make it through unskewed.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 11:35:37 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 229865 at http://dagblog.com With truly awesome respect, I http://dagblog.com/comment/229862#comment-229862 <a id="comment-229862"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229861#comment-229861">There&#039;s no way in 5 days it</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>With truly awesome respect, I disagree. Some facts is better than no factsl</p> <p>I have a vague memory that Hillary's server had been used for something like 30,000</p> <p>and the number of those that were classified was something like 100. And when those</p> <p>were further scrubbed to eliminate things like classified personnel actions with no security issues,</p> <p>the final nut averaged around 12 per year.  </p> <p>Which would sound a lot less worrying than " many thousands".</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 04:48:00 +0000 Flavius comment 229862 at http://dagblog.com There's no way in 5 days it http://dagblog.com/comment/229861#comment-229861 <a id="comment-229861"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229857#comment-229857">The numbers are daunting,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There's no way in 5 days it would clear her - no way anything definitive could be said except something bad - at this point it can only make it worse. We are where we are.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 03:49:49 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 229861 at http://dagblog.com The numbers are daunting, http://dagblog.com/comment/229857#comment-229857 <a id="comment-229857"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229816#comment-229816">Thanks. </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The numbers are daunting, barring internal dupes,  if there are really over half a million unique emails, there is the gap between that and the reported 30k shredded plus what was produced on Clinton's side.</p> <p> </p> <p>That said, it's obvious that if Loretta Lynch  picks up the phone and calls the Department of Defense for judge advocates who have security clearance, she can multiply the number of team members exponentially, and do the job as suggested above.</p> <p> </p> <p>If she wants.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:22:14 +0000 jollyroger comment 229857 at http://dagblog.com Don't be. There will then be http://dagblog.com/comment/229821#comment-229821 <a id="comment-229821"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229816#comment-229816">Thanks. </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't be. There will then be the question of whether Weiner had unauthorized confidential mails on his laptop and why. With another 30 congressional hearings to explore.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2016 11:34:17 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 229821 at http://dagblog.com Thanks.  http://dagblog.com/comment/229816#comment-229816 <a id="comment-229816"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229803#comment-229803">That&#039;s not how it works</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks. </p> <p>Not to be  over optimistic I think it is possible that everything will indeed be a duplicate if they've</p> <p>already searched Hillary's server for received  emails.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:22:03 +0000 Flavius comment 229816 at http://dagblog.com I would search for the words http://dagblog.com/comment/229804#comment-229804 <a id="comment-229804"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/comey-will-know-nov-8-21307">As I was saying comey will know before Nov 8</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I would search for the words 'Benghaaaazzi', Vince Foster, Al Qaeda, Bring the suitcase of cash to my State Department office,  rigged election, international banker elite, + all ISIS telephone numbers. Bound to be in there. Or assign one on his Hillary hating FBI grunts to....be creative and stuff.</p> <p>Comey would seal the nomination for AG in the Trump administration.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2016 03:30:26 +0000 NCD comment 229804 at http://dagblog.com That's not how it works http://dagblog.com/comment/229803#comment-229803 <a id="comment-229803"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/comey-will-know-nov-8-21307">As I was saying comey will know before Nov 8</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's not how it works unless every email is a duplicate of previously looked at email. Anything even slightly suspicious has to be sent to several government agencies. Each has to decide if the email is classified and at what level. The document becomes classified at the highest level any agency decides. In other words if agency A claims the document doesn't rank classification and agency B decides to classify it as Top Secret, Top Secret it becomes. Even if when it was sent it had no classification.</p> <p>That's just a part of how fucked up the classification system is.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2016 02:58:42 +0000 ocean-kat comment 229803 at http://dagblog.com Fuck Comey. He's already done http://dagblog.com/comment/229802#comment-229802 <a id="comment-229802"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/comey-will-know-nov-8-21307">As I was saying comey will know before Nov 8</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Fuck Comey. He's already done enough to screw up this election. He should go to an undisclosed location and gag himself for the next week. I know that Clinton wants him to come clean on what they get from Weiner's device (ahem), but I highly doubt that it will be clean (ahem again). There were will be more embarrassing revelations that fall short of anything indictable, and the media will debate the implications until the clock runs out. Not good for Clinton. Not good for democracy. Comey should stop talking to the press. Period.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 02 Nov 2016 02:35:19 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 229802 at http://dagblog.com