dagblog - Comments for "Obama should remove Comey" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-should-remove-comey-21314 Comments for "Obama should remove Comey" en Every Goverment Agency http://dagblog.com/comment/229917#comment-229917 <a id="comment-229917"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229915#comment-229915">The FBI is pro-Trump.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Every Government Agency including the Weather Bureau should  be abolished  every 15 years and restarted.</p> <p>Maybe.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 04 Nov 2016 16:06:02 +0000 Flavius comment 229917 at http://dagblog.com The FBI is pro-Trump. http://dagblog.com/comment/229915#comment-229915 <a id="comment-229915"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229913#comment-229913">I&#039;d prefer that Obama didn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The FBI is pro-Trump. Military leadership and the CIA are fearful of a Trump Presidency.  Comey is not in control of the FBI. The rogue agents are stirring the ship.</p> <p><a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/fbi-more-out-of-control-then-we-knew">http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/fbi-more-out-of-control-then-we-knew</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 04 Nov 2016 13:36:57 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 229915 at http://dagblog.com Case 1: Front page: GOP http://dagblog.com/comment/229914#comment-229914 <a id="comment-229914"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229913#comment-229913">I&#039;d prefer that Obama didn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Case 1: Front page: GOP screams "It's rigged!"</p> <p>Case 2: Front page: GOP screams: "see, we told you, it's serious.... and it's rigged!"</p> <p>Case 3: Front page: GOP screams: "see, we told you, it's serious... and it's rigged!"</p> <p>Case 4: No news, GOP screams: "It's serious... and it's rigged!</p> <p>We are where we are. Forget it, Jake - it's Chinatown.</p> <p>(Go watch Mystic River if you want to see our political version of happy endings. Can always be worse).</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 04 Nov 2016 11:44:32 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 229914 at http://dagblog.com I'd prefer that Obama didn't http://dagblog.com/comment/229913#comment-229913 <a id="comment-229913"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-should-remove-comey-21314">Obama should remove Comey</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'd prefer that Obama didn't fire him for several reasons .Just  put someone in charge</p> <p> of concluding the Huma email circus before  Nov 8. His incentives are the opposite. </p> <p>His worst outcome would be having to announce in the few remaining</p> <p> days whether or not he reaffirms last July's   no-indict position. Either way will create</p> <p>an uproar. And BTW be bad for the Bureau's reputation.Deservably.</p> <p><u>His</u> (not our) best option is to slow roll the investigation and cross</p> <p>that bridge a month from now.</p> <p>If  the trend of Hillary's decline continues to Monday  538's election eve</p> <p>forecast is going to be " too close to call" . And the actual result will be worse.</p> <p>Conversely if Comey announces on ,say, Saturday that he <u>chooses </u> not to make an </p> <p>announcement until after the election that will be taken as equivalent to a decision to</p> <p>indict. She'll  lose.</p> <p>Summarizing, from best to worse her chances rank as follows</p> <p>1.An announcement prior to Nov 8 reaffirming his decision not to indict. She'll win.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>2.One saying that he projects not completing the examination for many weeks. A toss up</p> <p>3.One saying it's been completed  but it will take him some time to reach</p> <p>a new decision. See above.</p> <p>A million years ago I went to Army  Officer Candidate School. The mantra there was  "Do something</p> <p>even if it's wrong".  I agree.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 04 Nov 2016 11:00:09 +0000 Flavius comment 229913 at http://dagblog.com My comment above actually http://dagblog.com/comment/229901#comment-229901 <a id="comment-229901"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229900#comment-229900">That would backfire by</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>My comment above actually meant he should receive his pink slip Nov 9. Garroting optional.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 22:10:02 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 229901 at http://dagblog.com That would backfire by http://dagblog.com/comment/229900#comment-229900 <a id="comment-229900"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-should-remove-comey-21314">Obama should remove Comey</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That would backfire by generating sympathy for Comey and inviting accusations of a cover-up. Comey should certainly be "encouraged" to resign--but not before the election.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 21:20:18 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 229900 at http://dagblog.com Josh adds context: http://dagblog.com/comment/229889#comment-229889 <a id="comment-229889"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229887#comment-229887">The whimsicallities above</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Josh adds context:</p> <p><a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/fbi-more-out-of-control-then-we-knew">http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/fbi-more-out-of-control-then-we-knew</a></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:21:46 +0000 jollyroger comment 229889 at http://dagblog.com Comey's  political http://dagblog.com/comment/229888#comment-229888 <a id="comment-229888"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-should-remove-comey-21314">Obama should remove Comey</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Comey's  political contributions</p> <ul><li>August 30, 2008 / $2,300 / John McCain, Republican candidate for president</li> <li>September 29, 2011 / $2,500 / Susan Brooks, Republican candidate for Congress</li> <li>August 22, 2011 / $2,500 / Mitt Romney, Republican candidate for president (primary)</li> <li>May 31, 2012 / $2,500 / Mitt Romney, Republican candidate for president (general)</li> </ul></div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:19:39 +0000 Flavius comment 229888 at http://dagblog.com The whimsicallities above http://dagblog.com/comment/229887#comment-229887 <a id="comment-229887"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obama-should-remove-comey-21314">Obama should remove Comey</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The whimsicallities above duly noted, and embracing the reality that the political fallout at this point of a forced recusal can only be understated as "catastrophic", it may be more useful to ask why in the name of your deity of choice did he re-appoint him?</p> <p> </p> <p>We can certainly see here the power of the position, (and no one who ever served as President over Hoover was in doubt...).</p> <p> </p> <p>The paradigm should be JFK/RFK, and if you don't have a sibling to spare, than go to a cousin, but keep the top law enforcement jobs in the family.</p> <p> </p> <p>Or, if not, at least your own fuckin' <strong>PARTY!!</strong></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:18:11 +0000 jollyroger comment 229887 at http://dagblog.com Almost forgot - hey Maiello, http://dagblog.com/comment/229884#comment-229884 <a id="comment-229884"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/229883#comment-229883">Hmn.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Almost forgot - hey Maiello, <a href="http://entertainment.time.com/2012/03/15/the-anniversary-you-cant-refuse-40-things-you-didnt-know-about-the-godfather/slide/luca-brasi-was-a-pro-at-dying/">who played Luca Brasi</a>?</p> <p> </p> <p><img alt="" height="360" src="https://timeentertainment.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/luca-dies-ii.jpg?w=720&amp;h=480&amp;crop=1" width="540" /></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 16:28:42 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 229884 at http://dagblog.com